Dickishness is relative.
For instance, to draw back to the by-now-probably-proverbial wallet it's pretty darn bad to take it from an earthly point of view. But if your God ascribes absolutely no value to it and says that repentance and development are the only important things, not whether John Smith and his children starve tonight, then it's not a bad thing. It's a meaningless means to the end of eschatological reward, which John Smith can share in too if he plays his cards right.
It's an eternal existence on a perfect plane. That one guy who stole your wallet and repented, but failed to reimburse you, isn't going to matter all that much.
Perhaps mine is a niche view, but it seems like a natural logical conclusion of what Christianity says. Actions are not important. Belief and repentance, even without accompanying action, is.
Pretty sure 99% of Christians you talk to would say stealing is wrong and you should give the hypothetical wallet back, because they're not ignoring the whole "faith without works is dead" thing
FWIW 100% of the Christians in the thread are saying you're wrong, and the burden of proof lies on thyself
What Christians want to believe is not what I'm describing.
"Do unto others as you would have them do to you" - Jesus
Sounds like not being a dick was in his agenda
Of course, he did sound rather dickish when he called a Canaanite a dog. This is a rather relative statement, depending upon what you'd like people to do to you. I might love BDSM, but if someone is terrified of confinement I'm not going to tie them up, despite having others do it to me. - not true story.