Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 81 82 [83] 84 85 ... 106

Author Topic: Paranormal 24 - Game over! Doppelganger Victory!  (Read 218745 times)

Tiruin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Life is too short for worries
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal 24 - Day 3 eats Psychics for breakfast
« Reply #1230 on: February 12, 2015, 02:44:21 am »

But heeey, maybe I'm overreacting.
Let's bring in solid proof, shall we? Screenpics! So people can see what actually happens instead of inferring from UXLZ's bloody 'empathy' on my internets!~
Screen flickers. Tabs don't load. Changed my browser a bit, yet the same problems occur. I am technically connected to the internet yet everything fails in random intervals. None of the PMs are related to Mafia up there.
And yes I've counter checked to at least see if anything actually loads--the same problem has the same root after much time of counter checking--the internet.

Is it that my many tabs make this occur? No. Same testing has given the same results even at 3 tabs open. The only edit I did was in the PMs to make the people there confidential (and of no connection to Mafia) anyway.

And that's just 8 minutes of it.
Logged

Jim Groovester

  • Bay Watcher
  • 1P
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal 24 - Day 3 eats Psychics for breakfast
« Reply #1231 on: February 12, 2015, 02:47:56 am »

And that's what exam fatigue does. Making me blow up despite Jim being reasonable on it. Because of that 'a bit' which I missed in reading it.

Actually, it was a mean-spirited joke.
Logged
I understood nothing, contributed nothing, but still got to win, so good game everybody else.

Tiruin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Life is too short for worries
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal 24 - Day 3 eats Psychics for breakfast
« Reply #1232 on: February 12, 2015, 02:48:23 am »

And that's what exam fatigue does. Making me blow up despite Jim being reasonable on it. Because of that 'a bit' which I missed in reading it.

Actually, it was a mean-spirited joke.
I know. :'(
Logged

UXLZ

  • Bay Watcher
  • God Eater
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal 24 - Day 3 eats Psychics for breakfast
« Reply #1233 on: February 12, 2015, 03:06:49 am »

Huh, I know your net is bad. I just think you're unreasonably using it as justification (or at least, were. It's better now.)

By the way, I actually can't see any issue with those screenshots. Maybe a few images have trouble loading? It seems about consistent with the experiences I've had personally. The main issue appears to be something the screenshots aren't showing... Are you getting DNS errors?

Here's a few suggestions to alleviate the damage (I don't know if you're already doing this stuff, so sorry if you are):

Don't go overboard with your Paranormal posts to the extent that you can't actually post them seemingly... Well, ever. You don't need a twelve page essay with nineteen quotes to be able to contribute something.
Ctrl+C your post BEFORE YOU TRY TO POST IT. That way, if the net decides to fail you don't just lose everything, and can try again later. It's only nomming your posts because you're letting it. (Not in the sense that you're doing on purpose, but it's something that's quite easily preventable.)
After that, it's a matter of persistence. You seem to be managing fairly well. Also, use quick reply (if you aren't already.) that's what I do, at least. You have to load a whole page less.

Logged
Ahhh~ She looked into your eyes,
And saw what laid beneath,
Don't try to save yourself,
The circle is complete.

Tiruin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Life is too short for worries
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal 24 - Day 3 eats Psychics for breakfast
« Reply #1234 on: February 12, 2015, 03:15:48 am »

Huh, I know your net is bad. I just think you're unreasonably using it as justification (or at least, were. It's better now.)
I'm using public net.
 :-\

By the way, I actually can't see any issue with those screenshots. Maybe a few images have trouble loading? It seems about consistent with the experiences I've had personally. The main issue appears to be something the screenshots aren't showing... Are you getting DNS errors?
::)
URL dissonance.
Images flickering when screenshot'd seconds after each other.
Tab dissonance.
Obvious showing that I'm still connected-dissonance.
No DNS errors. (What's a DNS? >_>)
The screenshots are showing what is happening when my net flops on its face.
Sadly, the screenshots cannot show how fast the flickering is.
And that the same tab doing 'Connecting...' has been connecting for the past 8 minutes. How's that for your 40 seconds to load a forum page thing? :D

But yeah. I'm "unreasonably using it as justification."
I've a post done up, up and over the 40k character limit, thanks.
Logged

UXLZ

  • Bay Watcher
  • God Eater
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal 24 - Day 3 eats Psychics for breakfast
« Reply #1235 on: February 12, 2015, 03:37:38 am »

Quote from: Tirinchan~
But yeah. I'm "unreasonably using it as justification."
I've a post done up, up and over the 40k character limit, thanks.

Knowing you, half of that character limit is probably made up of emotes. xD
More seriously, though:
 
You see Tiri-chan, I believe you, because I also have such a post. It is three hundred million paragraphs long, and details everything from the birth of the universe to the end of its creator. It contains the cure to cancer, the secret to eternal happiness, and the process by which humans ascend to godhood. It contains everything and yet it contains nothing, only the chosen may understand its message and those who are unworthy burn in holy fire.

I mean, I haven't actually posted it yet and no one has read it, but it's totally, definitely, not-at-all-sarcastically there.

So, here's my message: Regardless of whether it exists or not, it's a post that hasn't been posted. The way I'm demonstrating this might be a bit cruel, but I think it's necessary to show what it seems like from an outside perspective. Hell, that crazy super-post could actually exist but it would means NOTHING until it is actually HERE.
Logged
Ahhh~ She looked into your eyes,
And saw what laid beneath,
Don't try to save yourself,
The circle is complete.

Tiruin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Life is too short for worries
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal 24 - Day 3 eats Psychics for breakfast
« Reply #1236 on: February 12, 2015, 03:40:15 am »

So, here's my message: Regardless of whether it exists or not, it's a post that hasn't been posted. The way I'm demonstrating this might be a bit cruel, but I think it's necessary to show what it seems like from an outside perspective. Hell, that crazy super-post could actually exist but it would means NOTHING until it is actually HERE.
I know :v But it has been influencing my reads on people due to it acting like a living notepad.
You don't have to delve so deeply into it to deconstruct its very nature in the name of Quantum Physics.
And not realize that I don't think you don't think I don't realize this.
Nor do you have such a post due to the obviousness of how its stated.
Logged

Tiruin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Life is too short for worries
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal 24 - Day 3 eats Psychics for breakfast
« Reply #1237 on: February 12, 2015, 03:59:04 am »

Anyway, to that big post. Here it is.

...Also please fix the lurkertracker ZU ._.
It's an awesome tool.



As a prelude, I've crosschecked the players--currently standing at 10; 3 dopps.
Day 1 Start
D1/N1 link.
D2/N2 link.
I've also had the prevailing feeling that the lynch towards me is...a paltry one. Its understandable in the context of 'lurking scum', but the wording isn't open-ended in the face of comparing generally everyone else.
It is 'paltry' in my eyes, because of the indicators people use to validate their reasoning on their votes. Compared to the rest present--there doesn't seem to be much comparison for that kind of pressure (unless its to make me speak...which is really crazy, because I'm not one to sit down and laze through a game.)
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Right, firstly addressing that N1 fiasco.
It is obvious that the Scum NK happened on ToonyMan due to the claw marks (to be clarified: In Mephansteras' Paranormal/Supernatural games, the one killed ALWAYS leaves a clue as to the flavor of their killer--which cannot be changed per 'faction')
Flabort has shot ToonyMan, because of the bullet mark. It is impossible, unless there is a currently covert Vig who shot Flabort, that he shot Mastahcheese due to this event and description.
Mastahcheese Performed the NK--Unless someone shot Mastahcheese and an unknown-as-of-now Dopp killed ToonyMan and got protected. Which complicates things.

Now it can't be an Alien (ie Exterminator). The ONLY tech which may nudge into this situation is a role with a MEDIUM TECH slot.
Quote
Medium Tech
Combat Camouflage: A combination of weapons and accessories that allows the Exterminator to mask his kills as if they came from any source (Vig, Dopp, or Abduction). Also works on kills made by Assassin Bots.
Why it can't be such is due to the given factors present [ie War Vet + Vigilante setup and kill flavor contradicting any other instance otherwise mentioned; and pisskop said he targeted ToonyMan--and he is town {pisskop, that is}]
It can't also be an AssBot because of the given notion above (and that...As far as I recall, the Assassin Bot has its own distinct flavor. I think it was compared to a spherical bot with blades? *chop chop chop*?)

Mephansteras: In this hypothetical scenario of an Alien killer with a Combat Camouflage tech--can the person change their 'masks' to different forms of flavor per kill, or is it a 'once set, this is what should be shown through the entirety of the game'?

Now as to my reads     Despite being a big jerk. :I
> UXLZ is town--if there has been any spotting of a discrepancy in deadchat, NQT wouldn't have been that thorough in detailing his information, due to those before him being able to prod and poke the Medium on both fronts (in public-thread and in Deadchat). This has primarily been changed from neutral-leaning due to comparison of his posts (which are too long in number to sift and link here) towards his general demeanor.
...And also to the list below stating his general demeanor which brings him merit in my eye.





Scripten
Now you all recall my stance on him before, right? It's partly based on this post and his playstyle; he depends on interaction, and in the lack of such, suspicion creeps in.
Which invariably is reasonable due to how he's been acting ever since--something which poked my vote off as it was primarily based on 'Scripten is merely voting 'lurkers' with the presumption that they're scum over anyone else in-game'.
However that doesn't mean I do not suspect him.


I cut out the rest of the text and saved it in the meantime.
Scripten: Searchword 'Activity'; nobody has questioned you on that idea it seems:
Has your vote always been under the assumption of active lurking? It has been that way since this WHOLE GAME.
That, and poking at pisskop's note above--the only time it was questioned is when you deliver a hammering impact on me regarding Active Lurking and nothing else whatsoever (meaning: You did not answer another's question regarding your vote, even if indirectly)
Logged

UXLZ

  • Bay Watcher
  • God Eater
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal 24 - Day 3 eats Psychics for breakfast
« Reply #1238 on: February 12, 2015, 04:20:46 am »

Yaaay, -hugs Tiri-chan-, you've done iiiit.
Of course I'm wondering though: How did you access it? Presumably you're still on public net?
Logged
Ahhh~ She looked into your eyes,
And saw what laid beneath,
Don't try to save yourself,
The circle is complete.

UXLZ

  • Bay Watcher
  • God Eater
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal 24 - Day 3 eats Psychics for breakfast
« Reply #1239 on: February 12, 2015, 05:21:36 am »

Well, NQT just PM'd me and he said that Toony was explicitly killed by Cheese and Flabort.
Logged
Ahhh~ She looked into your eyes,
And saw what laid beneath,
Don't try to save yourself,
The circle is complete.

Cheeetar

  • Bay Watcher
  • Spaceghost Perpetrator
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal 24 - Day 3 eats Psychics for breakfast
« Reply #1240 on: February 12, 2015, 05:26:02 am »

Well, yeah. That's what we've known for a long time. What's the source of this confusion?
Logged
I've played some mafia.

Most of the time when someone is described as politically correct they are simply correct.

UXLZ

  • Bay Watcher
  • God Eater
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal 24 - Day 3 eats Psychics for breakfast
« Reply #1241 on: February 12, 2015, 05:27:01 am »

No idea. Someone (I think it was Jim or Scripten?) suggested that MC could have been guarding the person doing the NK rather than actually doing it.
Logged
Ahhh~ She looked into your eyes,
And saw what laid beneath,
Don't try to save yourself,
The circle is complete.

Deus Asmoth

  • Bay Watcher
  • Bland, but sensible.
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal 24 - Day 3 eats Psychics for breakfast
« Reply #1242 on: February 12, 2015, 08:44:03 am »

I believe the problem was that Jim forgot he'd seen Cheese visiting Tooney, so he wasn't sure whether Tooney killed Cheese as a result of being targeted or because he blocked Tooney from killing someone else.
Logged
Look elsewhere, reader. There is nothing for you here.

Scripten

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal 24 - Day 3 eats Psychics for breakfast
« Reply #1243 on: February 12, 2015, 09:30:16 am »

That's not possible. NQT inspected me as Find on N1, ergo I was not performing the kill N1.

Right. I'd forgotten about that. Disregard my suspicion, for I am truly a dunce.

UXLZ:

Truth be told, I find that hella unlikely. I think it's phrased like that due to the style of writing.
Think of it this way: We know two people that Toony definitely shot at: Flabort and Deus.
We know he shot at one other person. Now, do you really think the flavor of MC guarding someone who's attacking Toony would be written with Toony never attacking the person who's actually going after him? I just can't see it.

Nah, it's pretty much unthinkably unlikely now that I am reminded that NQT confirmed Jim's goal that night. On the other hand, if my hypothetical situation had happened, I do feel that it would be too town-sided (balance-wise) to post that MC had guarded someone else, at least explicitly.

No idea. Someone (I think it was Jim or Scripten?) suggested that MC could have been guarding the person doing the NK rather than actually doing it.

It was me being forgetful. :P Jim had forgotten that he'd followed MC, and I'd forgotten that NQT had confirmed him following MC. (Or, at least, having "find" as a goal) Hence, I was thinking that it might be possible that Jim was the dopp who performed the kill, but MC was guarding him at the time and thus got shot.

Apologies for spawning confusion.



Tiruin:

I've made a narrowing list with NQT over PMs--I think he quoted it, I'm unsure given the slow speed, however I did note the lightheartedness of general people here that I can't, actually, narrow down who in the midst of 'Shakerag, ZU, Jim, Toaster' or those queries who you note back there as 'scummier over the other'; duality of thought pertains to seeing either/or in this case, and neither stands out.
It's all in the big post which I should really post soon enough but gahhhh <_<
Does this not show my honesty regarding the queries on the reads?

Honestly? Not really. It just feels like you're sidestepping the question because you can't think it up in time.

I'm just making a confuzzled statement on WHY people are still thinking MC didn't kill Toony, because seeing that the DEAD show the truth--AND that pisskop says he acted on Toony (which doesn't seem to be something acknowledged by you or UXLZ due to the 'may' stance y'all got regarding that situation, in how I read it anyway), so the invariably obvious idea is that its the simplest one presented.

Was really just me, and was because I was dumb.

> Toaster has been ill, but I see a degree of pointedness in his posts which make me feel a bit...edgy around his playstyle this game.
> ZU is more focused, in regards to Toaster. Focusing on several specific parts of a person, and therefore a single person, shifting throughout the game. There's a degree of astuteness in him that doesn't point one way or the other given the lack of indication on others, in posts of his.

Would this then be accurate of your reads?

Toaster: Null, leaning scum
Zombie Urist: Null, leaning town

Mastahcheese Performed the NK--Unless someone shot Mastahcheese and an unknown-as-of-now Dopp killed ToonyMan and got protected.

If you're curious, this is the hypothetical situation I was musing over.

Has your vote always been under the assumption of active lurking? It has been that way since this WHOLE GAME.

Pretty much, though it's grown stronger as you reply with more and more fluff and dodging. There's also the fact that your reads, on day 3, are but puffs of air. (That is, not very strong at all, despite being fairy wordy.) You're trying to wiggle out of a lynch, but you're not really scumhunting. The most solid contributions you've given have been setup spec, which is a common place for scum to hide and pretend to contribute from.

I keep getting this feeling that the votes from ZU and Toaster on me during D2 were supposed to be a threat for voting Tiruin. (Considering they both accused me of having weak/toothless votes/cases or exclusively targeting lurkers.) Then when D3 comes along, you vote me with all kinds of spectacle and hold onto this big post that you claim has all this analysis. When you finally post it, the brunt of it is that I'm targeting you for active lurking and that I find people who post but don't contribute actual content to be scummy.

Well, yeah. I do. Because active lurking and pretending to contribute while decidedly not doing so IS SCUMMY.

Some questions for you, Tiruin:

Why am I your only scum read? (Discounting your consideration of DA, thought that is also... pretty weird.) And why is your only scum read so weak that you aren't even comfortable keeping your vote on me?

Also, why are your reads so intangible? You could easily say that anyone is scum or town without having to explain your train of thought, since almost every read you have given has said that you find everyone just about null.
Logged

Shakerag

  • Bay Watcher
  • Just here for the schadenfreude.
    • View Profile
Re: Paranormal 24 - Day 3 eats Psychics for breakfast
« Reply #1244 on: February 12, 2015, 10:24:35 am »

Tiruin:
Have you tried going into your browser's settings and telling it to not show/download pictures?  Yeah, it makes things look like ass, but they do tend to load pretty quickly.


UXLZ:
Shakerag:
I'll definitely be voting for Tiruin if she keeps sidestepping Scripten's questions, but can you explain what info we'd get from their flip?
If she flips town, then we can confirm her reads.  If she flips scum, then that could implicate Toaster and zombie urist (and maybe Jim) as being potential scumbuddies of hers. 
Pages: 1 ... 81 82 [83] 84 85 ... 106