That's not possible. NQT inspected me as Find on N1, ergo I was not performing the kill N1.
Right. I'd forgotten about that. Disregard my suspicion, for I am truly a dunce.
UXLZ:Truth be told, I find that hella unlikely. I think it's phrased like that due to the style of writing.
Think of it this way: We know two people that Toony definitely shot at: Flabort and Deus.
We know he shot at one other person. Now, do you really think the flavor of MC guarding someone who's attacking Toony would be written with Toony never attacking the person who's actually going after him? I just can't see it.
Nah, it's pretty much unthinkably unlikely now that I am reminded that NQT confirmed Jim's goal that night. On the other hand, if my hypothetical situation had happened, I do feel that it would be too town-sided (balance-wise) to post that MC had guarded someone else, at least explicitly.
No idea. Someone (I think it was Jim or Scripten?) suggested that MC could have been guarding the person doing the NK rather than actually doing it.
It was me being forgetful.
Jim had forgotten that he'd followed MC, and I'd forgotten that NQT had confirmed him following MC. (Or, at least, having "find" as a goal) Hence, I was thinking that it might be possible that Jim was the dopp who performed the kill, but MC was guarding him at the time and thus got shot.
Apologies for spawning confusion.
Tiruin:I've made a narrowing list with NQT over PMs--I think he quoted it, I'm unsure given the slow speed, however I did note the lightheartedness of general people here that I can't, actually, narrow down who in the midst of 'Shakerag, ZU, Jim, Toaster' or those queries who you note back there as 'scummier over the other'; duality of thought pertains to seeing either/or in this case, and neither stands out.
It's all in the big post which I should really post soon enough but gahhhh <_<
Does this not show my honesty regarding the queries on the reads?
Honestly? Not really. It just feels like you're sidestepping the question because you can't think it up in time.
I'm just making a confuzzled statement on WHY people are still thinking MC didn't kill Toony, because seeing that the DEAD show the truth--AND that pisskop says he acted on Toony (which doesn't seem to be something acknowledged by you or UXLZ due to the 'may' stance y'all got regarding that situation, in how I read it anyway), so the invariably obvious idea is that its the simplest one presented.
Was really just me, and was because I was dumb.
> Toaster has been ill, but I see a degree of pointedness in his posts which make me feel a bit...edgy around his playstyle this game.
> ZU is more focused, in regards to Toaster. Focusing on several specific parts of a person, and therefore a single person, shifting throughout the game. There's a degree of astuteness in him that doesn't point one way or the other given the lack of indication on others, in posts of his.
Would this then be accurate of your reads?
Toaster: Null, leaning scum
Zombie Urist: Null, leaning town
Mastahcheese Performed the NK--Unless someone shot Mastahcheese and an unknown-as-of-now Dopp killed ToonyMan and got protected.
If you're curious, this is the hypothetical situation I was musing over.
Has your vote always been under the assumption of active lurking? It has been that way since this WHOLE GAME.
Pretty much, though it's grown stronger as you reply with more and more fluff and dodging. There's also the fact that your reads, on day 3, are but puffs of air. (That is, not very strong at all, despite being fairy wordy.) You're trying to wiggle out of a lynch, but you're not really scumhunting. The most solid contributions you've given have been setup spec, which is a common place for scum to hide and pretend to contribute from.
I keep getting this feeling that the votes from ZU and Toaster on me during D2 were supposed to be a threat for voting Tiruin. (Considering they both accused me of having weak/toothless votes/cases or exclusively targeting lurkers.) Then when D3 comes along, you vote me with all kinds of spectacle and hold onto this big post that you claim has all this analysis. When you finally post it, the brunt of it is that I'm targeting you for active lurking and that I find people who post but don't contribute actual content to be scummy.
Well, yeah. I do. Because active lurking and pretending to contribute while decidedly not doing so IS SCUMMY.
Some questions for you,
Tiruin:
Why am I your only scum read? (Discounting your consideration of DA, thought that is also... pretty weird.) And why is your only scum read so weak that you aren't even comfortable keeping your vote on me?
Also, why are your reads so intangible? You could easily say that anyone is scum or town without having to explain your train of thought, since almost every read you have given has said that you find everyone just about null.