Lots of sweeping generalizations going around
I don't see how making better female characters is selling out to a lowest common denominator of women, I agree that everyone can appreciate it. I think the publishers with the dollars feel safer focusing on graphics, then gameplay, then throwing in trite characters who insult men and women alike. (I don't like the idea that my dream is to be a meathead who picks up airheads!)
And viciously, part of the difficulty is that people are finally paying attention to female characters with actual character, and analyzing them... So it's safer to only have 2-line NPC females who don't get analyzed. Risky things like new Lara Croft (and the island of graphic deaths) get super analyzed. Actually... That's free press, why aren't more companies getting in on that? The controversy could actually be positive for once.
because most female gamers are interested in games with content. And we are interested in the same games as males.
You've just been arguing the opposite for the entire thread.
No, she's been arguing that they're excluded. Which is really true (to the extent that it detracts from my experience as a male gamer, sometimes). People keep misinterpreting that as "cover up all skin and shoehorn in characterless female protagonists at any cost", and arguing against that.