Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 38 39 [40] 41 42 ... 125

Author Topic: Females in Games? Thread  (Read 166603 times)

Sergarr

  • Bay Watcher
  • (9) airheaded baka (9)
    • View Profile
Re: Females in Games? Thread
« Reply #585 on: December 19, 2014, 03:25:58 pm »

It is no longer a derail; it is its own thread. This can return to the mess it formerly was now.

I also made a point about how divorcing appearance from gameplay is not really good for gameplay since appearance indicates to players the nature of the creature or object, using the example of how in combat someone wearing invisible armour in a part of her body would have an unfair advantage since nobody would know that she was wearing it.

Eh, practically no games use hitboxes for combat anyway. It's just HP + armour modifier, and MAYBE extra damage for a headshot.
...what.

Like, all shooters use hitboxes! If that's "no games" for you, then I can safely assume you don't play a lot of FPS games. Do you?
Logged
._.

Caz

  • Bay Watcher
  • [PREFSTRING:comforting whirs]
    • View Profile
Re: Females in Games? Thread
« Reply #586 on: December 19, 2014, 03:30:37 pm »


Like, all shooters use hitboxes! If that's "no games" for you, then I can safely assume you don't play a lot of FPS games. Do you?

What FPS games have customisable armour? Never played one that when armour was picked up it didn't give a whole-body bonus.
Logged

My Name is Immaterial

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Females in Games? Thread
« Reply #587 on: December 19, 2014, 03:30:55 pm »

It is no longer a derail; it is its own thread. This can return to the mess it formerly was now.

I also made a point about how divorcing appearance from gameplay is not really good for gameplay since appearance indicates to players the nature of the creature or object, using the example of how in combat someone wearing invisible armour in a part of her body would have an unfair advantage since nobody would know that she was wearing it.

Eh, practically no games use hitboxes for combat anyway. It's just HP + armour modifier, and MAYBE extra damage for a headshot.
...what.

Like, all shooters use hitboxes! If that's "no games" for you, then I can safely assume you don't play a lot of FPS games. Do you?
I'm pretty sure Caz meant different hitboxes, for legs, arms, etc, that had different resistance to damage.

smeeprocket

  • Bay Watcher
  • Collectivist Socialist Feminist Freeloader
    • View Profile
Re: Females in Games? Thread
« Reply #588 on: December 19, 2014, 03:31:39 pm »

http://www.themarysue.com/talking-female-characters-friendzoning-and-representation-with-the-writers-of-borderlands-the-pre-sequel/

Here's an article on Borderlands and feminism, just to add to the topic.

I don't understand your point Urist. Are you saying it would be bad to not sexualize women on the basis of hitboxes? I... no I'm misinterpreting. Could you clarify?
Logged
Steam Name: Ratpocalypse
Transpersons and intersex persons mod for Fortress mode of DF: http://dffd.wimbli.com/file.php?id=10204

Twitch: http://www.twitch.tv/princessslaughter/

"I can't wait to throw your corpse on to a jump pad and watch it take to the air like a child's imagination."

Caz

  • Bay Watcher
  • [PREFSTRING:comforting whirs]
    • View Profile
Re: Females in Games? Thread
« Reply #589 on: December 19, 2014, 03:34:09 pm »

It is no longer a derail; it is its own thread. This can return to the mess it formerly was now.

I also made a point about how divorcing appearance from gameplay is not really good for gameplay since appearance indicates to players the nature of the creature or object, using the example of how in combat someone wearing invisible armour in a part of her body would have an unfair advantage since nobody would know that she was wearing it.

Eh, practically no games use hitboxes for combat anyway. It's just HP + armour modifier, and MAYBE extra damage for a headshot.
...what.

Like, all shooters use hitboxes! If that's "no games" for you, then I can safely assume you don't play a lot of FPS games. Do you?
I'm pretty sure Caz meant different hitboxes, for legs, arms, etc, that had different resistance to damage.

Yeah, pretty much. I was trying to cover the point about men and women's armour being 'different' even though it was the same item - e.g. male armour gets full body coverage while the female armour has a boob window. To make it realistic, the argument was that the hitboxes for the female armour would have to be different. I was making the argument that no game goes this in-depth when it has armour anyway, so the point is a bit moot.
Logged

TamerVirus

  • Bay Watcher
  • Who cares
    • View Profile
Re: Females in Games? Thread
« Reply #590 on: December 19, 2014, 03:35:49 pm »


Like, all shooters use hitboxes! If that's "no games" for you, then I can safely assume you don't play a lot of FPS games. Do you?

What FPS games have customisable armour? Never played one that when armour was picked up it didn't give a whole-body bonus.

I think....Counter strike did that? But only with torso and head? I also think weapon damaged varied on where you were shot?

Logged
What can mysteriously disappear can mysteriously reappear
*Shakes fist at TamerVirus*

My Name is Immaterial

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Females in Games? Thread
« Reply #591 on: December 19, 2014, 03:36:36 pm »

It is no longer a derail; it is its own thread. This can return to the mess it formerly was now.

I also made a point about how divorcing appearance from gameplay is not really good for gameplay since appearance indicates to players the nature of the creature or object, using the example of how in combat someone wearing invisible armour in a part of her body would have an unfair advantage since nobody would know that she was wearing it.

Eh, practically no games use hitboxes for combat anyway. It's just HP + armour modifier, and MAYBE extra damage for a headshot.
...what.

Like, all shooters use hitboxes! If that's "no games" for you, then I can safely assume you don't play a lot of FPS games. Do you?
I'm pretty sure Caz meant different hitboxes, for legs, arms, etc, that had different resistance to damage.

Yeah, pretty much. I was trying to cover the point about men and women's armour being 'different' even though it was the same item - e.g. male armour gets full body coverage while the female armour has a boob window. To make it realistic, the argument was that the hitboxes for the female armour would have to be different. I was making the argument that no game goes this in-depth when it has armour anyway, so the point is a bit moot.
What FPS has a boob window?

Caz

  • Bay Watcher
  • [PREFSTRING:comforting whirs]
    • View Profile
Re: Females in Games? Thread
« Reply #592 on: December 19, 2014, 03:42:05 pm »

What FPS has a boob window?


Spoiler (click to show/hide)


boob window, midriff exposed, and rarer reverse-gender boob window. that's from UT99. it's three skins with each having a male and a female version.
Logged

My Name is Immaterial

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Females in Games? Thread
« Reply #593 on: December 19, 2014, 03:44:59 pm »

How about a FPS with a boob window published this millenium?

smeeprocket

  • Bay Watcher
  • Collectivist Socialist Feminist Freeloader
    • View Profile
Re: Females in Games? Thread
« Reply #594 on: December 19, 2014, 03:45:57 pm »

Yea, even Elder Scrolls Online, which has tried to be more accommodating to women, has armor with boob windows

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
tbh they have a lot of revealing armor. You can, however, avoid this because crafted armor has a billion different styles. The problem is, that boob window is like the opposite of practical.

How about a FPS with a boob window published this millenium?

A lot of FPS don't do this because they don't include women.
« Last Edit: December 19, 2014, 03:48:29 pm by smeeprocket »
Logged
Steam Name: Ratpocalypse
Transpersons and intersex persons mod for Fortress mode of DF: http://dffd.wimbli.com/file.php?id=10204

Twitch: http://www.twitch.tv/princessslaughter/

"I can't wait to throw your corpse on to a jump pad and watch it take to the air like a child's imagination."

Urist Tilaturist

  • Bay Watcher
  • The most dwarven name possible.
    • View Profile
Re: Females in Games? Thread
« Reply #595 on: December 19, 2014, 03:50:51 pm »

Just so it's clear for everybody, I believe skin-showing female "armour" and boob windows are stupid and there should not be invisible armour over areas not covered by armour, forcing developers to give everybody sensible armour. If games do not go into enough depth to show this, it is their fault for being shallow. DF does it.

That elder scrolls online armour looks completely stupid for a litany of reasons anyway, the boob window is just the most serious problem. Another reason not to play elder scrolls.

All shooters I've played use hitboxes. Fixed "armour modifiers" sound a dumb idea to me, armour can block a blow completely, reduce the damage or offer no protection at all depending on circumstances. Why would greaves protect someone's head, unless they were in the way?

FPS not including women is fine for some conflicts and not for others. If it is set on the Western Front of World War 1, fine. If it is set in Iraq/Syria now, not fine, because the Kurds use women soldiers. 1:1 gender ratio is not right for any conflict except maybe a few individual battles in certain wars (Viet Nam on the VC side, Eritrea-Ethiopia on the Eritrean side, Dahomey against France on the Dahomey side) and should not be represented as the norm except in wacky counter-factual scenarios.
« Last Edit: December 19, 2014, 03:55:58 pm by Urist Uristurister »
Logged
On the item is an image of a dwarf and an elephant. The elephant is striking down the dwarf.

For old times' sake.

Caz

  • Bay Watcher
  • [PREFSTRING:comforting whirs]
    • View Profile
Re: Females in Games? Thread
« Reply #596 on: December 19, 2014, 03:51:27 pm »

How about a FPS with a boob window published this millenium?


I don't see what the date the game was published has to do with the argument.

Here is one from UT3, published 2007. If that's still not satisfactory, you can always google it yourself. :P

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Logged

TamerVirus

  • Bay Watcher
  • Who cares
    • View Profile
Re: Females in Games? Thread
« Reply #597 on: December 19, 2014, 03:56:20 pm »

Wow, once you even give it a second of thought, a boob window in an FPS is  really fricken stupid.

SHOOT HERE TO WIN
Logged
What can mysteriously disappear can mysteriously reappear
*Shakes fist at TamerVirus*

Caz

  • Bay Watcher
  • [PREFSTRING:comforting whirs]
    • View Profile
Re: Females in Games? Thread
« Reply #598 on: December 19, 2014, 03:57:57 pm »

Just so it's clear for everybody, I believe skin-showing female "armour" and boob windows are stupid and there should not be invisible armour over areas not covered by armour, forcing developers to give everybody sensible armour.

Yeah, it is really dumb.

All shooters I've played use hitboxes. Fixed "armour modifiers" sound a dumb idea to me, armour can block a blow completely, reduce the damage or offer no protection at all depending on circumstances. Why would greaves protect someone's head, unless they were in the way?

Really? What games have you played that give extra 'resistance' only to the armour picked up? e.g. legs only, chest only etc. I haven't come across them, but I could be wrong.
Logged

Urist Tilaturist

  • Bay Watcher
  • The most dwarven name possible.
    • View Profile
Re: Females in Games? Thread
« Reply #599 on: December 19, 2014, 03:59:28 pm »

I did not say that "armour modifiers" were not used, only that they were stupid. Only hitboxes are widely used. Most games are so stupid I feel like I'll turn to a zombie if I play them much.
Logged
On the item is an image of a dwarf and an elephant. The elephant is striking down the dwarf.

For old times' sake.
Pages: 1 ... 38 39 [40] 41 42 ... 125