Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[TolyK]

That's fine. Get feeling better. PTSD sucks.

Especially since...


Jack A T has actioned Jim Groovester
Flabort has actioned Jim Groovester
Flabort has actioned Vector
Flabort has actioned Jim Groovester


And the day has been EXTENDED.



- Cleanup on aisle four!
- But we don't have any islands!


The appointed hammerer is JIM GROOVESTER.
Day will end: FRIDAY, 11 AM UTC or so.

Votecount:

Shakerag (0)-
Cheetar (0)-
Jack A T (1)- Flabort
GayArchaea (0)-
TheDarkStar (0)-
Flabort  (1)- Varee
Vector (0)-
Varee (0)-
Tiruin (0)-
Jim Groovester (0)-
Toaster (0) -
Persus13 (0) -
4maskwolf (2) -  Shakerag, Persus13
Mastahcheese (6) - Jack A T, Vector, TheDarkStar, Jimbot, Toaster, SuperBlackCat
SuperBlackCat (0) - Cheeetar

To Hammer: Majority at Day End
Please note that voting shenanigans are not displayed if they occur.


Not voting:
(4maskwolf, GayArchaea, 4maskwolf, Mastahcheese, Tiruin, 4maskwolf) (4)

Extensions used:
Vector (1/2)

I totally expect to be ninja'd by TolyK with those public targeting anouncements, because I just got the PM that the roles have been sent.

I would've, but I decided to do a votecount as well.

[Jim Groovester]

I did, in fact, receive two roles just now.

One of them is the role that makes its owner win if it's Cheeetar and otherwise does nothing. I can freely give the role to anybody, except Cheeeetar. There's a rather severe warning that I should not give the role to Cheeeeetar.

Does anybody want the role that makes its owner win if it's Cheeeeeetar and otherwise does nothing?

Except for you, Cheeeeeeetar. I'm not giving you the role that makes its owner win if it's Cheeeeeeeetar and otherwise does nothing. Sorry, Cheeeeeeeeetar.

The second role gave me an extra win condition, one I have to fulfill in addition to my current one. So, thanks for that, flabort.

Say, are any of you genies? I mean, just curious, it has nothing to do with the role I just received or anything. flabort, you're not a genie, are you?

[Cheeetar]

I... I really want that role.

Please?

[Cheeetar]

Cheetar: I don't think that anymore. I don't even know what to think of him. I thought he was third-party because a gambit that doesn't really help mafia more than town. (Who knows who Toaster will kill) was not worth that many votes/attention draw. Now it seems more valid, especially if mastahcheese thought Toaster would die. And now he revealed a power role. He also created a lot of confusion. This seems like a much more valid scum gambit now than before. Even if it meant sacrificing himself, and if Varee was correct, there were at least 2 or 3 scum?? (Can't remember the number). If there is 3, that means he has plenty of support from other scums.

Alright! Your defense of him was really weird and contentless earlier- you going back on that with further details goes a way towards towniness, but I still think it was suspicious (especially the whole "Focus on Toaster instead!" thing.)

Unvote Superblackcat.

Well, I'm glad I'm not dead. Toaster had a motive in trying to shoot me- what wincon do you have, Toaster, and how is it served by trying to kill somebody who is scumhunting? Surely, shooting anybody would give you more information on how Shakerag/Mafia works- why specifically me?

Toaster: Please answer this?

[Varee]

sry for my inactivity, got cuaght up a bit.


I think I read some questions to me but I cant find them now ....


something about killing: I dont think I will kill anyone even if I got a kill to use, better let people enjoy their day with this crazy game right?
About shakerags and mafias: It is related to my power and a little mishap so I dont want to give it all away just yet
Jim: popular request is also another power so .....


Well from what I know I think some people in the game is both shakerag(town?) and mafia at the same time.


Heck I dont even think shakerag mean town now, It might just mean not mafia .....

[mastahcheese]

Mastahcheese: Why are you prioritizing gambits over scumhunting?

Because insane gambits causes huge amounts of arguements, allowing shitloads of scumslips because everyone is too focused on the insanity of the gambit to pay attention to covering their ass.

[TolyK]

See sig, since this is great out of context.

[4maskwolf]

Watch you guys blow up the thread while I'm gone at school again...

Given that yesterday I came back to 5 new pages...

[TolyK]

*takes Dyno-Might out of pocket*

GayArchaea is playing?

Apparently.

I thought quite the same thing. I'm pretty sure I made a role for him...

[4maskwolf]

Jim Groovester: why did you add an e to Cheeetar's name every time your wrote it?

[TolyK]

Also, votecount post fix'd a bit.
Also, kitten pics are perfect.

[Persus13]

4maskwolf: Do you have three votes?

Whoah there cowboy, slow down.  Why would you say such a...
*4maskwolf checks votecount
Welp.
That cat's out of the bag.

Now, Persus13, I must ask: we're past the random voting stage, right?  If so, then why do you deem my possession of three votes to be worth voting for?  Or is there something there you aren't explaining?

Both questions are on the right track. I can't vote with reasoning attached in the same vote. I was voting you because I find it odd that you wouldn't inform the rest of us about it. While it does make you a bigger target, it's also something that is hard to keep hidden.

[Persus13]

4maskwolf: Do you have three votes?

Whoah there cowboy, slow down.  Why would you say such a...
*4maskwolf checks votecount
Welp.
That cat's out of the bag.

Now, Persus13, I must ask: we're past the random voting stage, right?  If so, then why do you deem my possession of three votes to be worth voting for?  Or is there something there you aren't explaining?

I can't vote with my reason in the same post. I thought it odd that you hadn't revealed something that game-changing, especially as votecounts usually reveal that information anyways.

Mastahcheese: Why are you prioritizing gambits over scumhunting?

Because insane gambits causes huge amounts of arguements, allowing shitloads of scumslips because everyone is too focused on the insanity of the gambit to pay attention to covering their ass.

And yet your still not suspicious of anyone besides Toaster? Also, your suspicious of Toaster because?

[Jim Groovester]

Aren't you also forbidden from double posting?

I have an awful post restriction. Among other things, I can't vote with a reason in the same post, and I can't double post.

Yes, you are.

So, when we can we expect that you'll be modkilled?

Please?

No.

Jim Groovester: why did you add an e to Cheeetar's name every time your wrote it?

Because I thought it was funny.

[TolyK]

I'm guessing it's a post-vs-preview thing, given the same first quote.
However, the content after them is different...

Hm....