Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5

Author Topic: Post-Scarcity Thread  (Read 8942 times)

Orange Wizard

  • Bay Watcher
  • mou ii yo
    • View Profile
    • S M U G
Re: Post-Scarcity Thread
« Reply #15 on: October 11, 2014, 02:21:31 am »

libraries provide free web access
hahahahahahahaha
Logged
Please don't shitpost, it lowers the quality of discourse
Hard science is like a sword, and soft science is like fear. You can use both to equally powerful results, but even if your opponent disbelieve your stabs, they will still die.

alexandertnt

  • Bay Watcher
  • (map 'list (lambda (post) (+ post awesome)) posts)
    • View Profile
Re: Post-Scarcity Thread
« Reply #16 on: October 11, 2014, 04:31:12 am »

libraries provide free web access
hahahahahahahaha

Yeah, the only real reason why libraries provide free internet access is because governments pay for it. They get this money through taxation, which in turn comes from working and buying stuff. It's not actually free, and also would contribute to a (slight) increase in cost of various things.

You end up in a situation where the only reason why you have free internet is because other people are working to make it happen for you (or you are youself, if your paying tax).

There is nothing inherently wrong with this, but as far as I can tell this isn't post-scarcity (it just might look like it depending on your situation), in the sense that if people stop working on it (repairing/upgrading/expanding communications equiptment, fixing security exploits etc), than the internet goes away. It's not just "there", people are working hard to provide it.
Logged
This is when I imagine the hilarity which may happen if certain things are glichy. Such as targeting your own body parts to eat.

You eat your own head
YOU HAVE BEEN STRUCK DOWN!

LordBucket

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Post-Scarcity Thread
« Reply #17 on: October 11, 2014, 05:41:07 am »

The only reason we have free email is because the companies that provide email services pay for it. Would you therefore claim that email service is scarce?

if everyone on the planet each had a magic box with a button on it that every time anyone pressed it, a paperclip magically materialized inside the box...would you claim that paperclips were scarce because the work of pushing the button was required to generate paperclips?

Let's not require perfect solutions.

Post-scarcity is unlikely to arrive in totality from one moment to the next. It's more likely to be a gradual change.

We already covered this.

alexandertnt

  • Bay Watcher
  • (map 'list (lambda (post) (+ post awesome)) posts)
    • View Profile
Re: Post-Scarcity Thread
« Reply #18 on: October 11, 2014, 05:50:55 am »

if everyone on the planet each had a magic box with a button on it that every time anyone pressed it, a paperclip magically materialized inside the box...would you claim that paperclips were scarce because the work of pushing the button was required to generate paperclips?

If the magic boxes were scarce themselves, and wore a bit each time you pushed that button, than yes, I would.
Logged
This is when I imagine the hilarity which may happen if certain things are glichy. Such as targeting your own body parts to eat.

You eat your own head
YOU HAVE BEEN STRUCK DOWN!

LordBucket

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Post-Scarcity Thread
« Reply #19 on: October 11, 2014, 06:00:32 am »

If the magic boxes were scarce themselves, and wore a bit each time you pushed that button, than yes, I would.

In that case, sunlight is scarce because eventually the sun will burn out.

Go away and post in another thread. You're having a different conversation than anyone else is.

Helgoland

  • Bay Watcher
  • No man is an island.
    • View Profile
Re: Post-Scarcity Thread
« Reply #20 on: October 11, 2014, 06:05:09 am »

The sun is not worn out by us using the light it sends out. It's a false analogy.
Logged
The Bay12 postcard club
Arguably he's already a progressive, just one in the style of an enlightened Kaiser.
I'm going to do the smart thing here and disengage. This isn't a hill I paticularly care to die on.

alexandertnt

  • Bay Watcher
  • (map 'list (lambda (post) (+ post awesome)) posts)
    • View Profile
Re: Post-Scarcity Thread
« Reply #21 on: October 11, 2014, 06:30:07 am »

Go away and post in another thread. You're having a different conversation than anyone else is.

The only reason I contend that these free services are not post-scarce is because I work on stuff like this as a job. The more people push that button, the harder my job gets. It hardly feels like post-scarcity to me :-\ And I really don't think my job is as easy as sunrays.

I believe that my point is quite relevant, and that your just being rude.
Logged
This is when I imagine the hilarity which may happen if certain things are glichy. Such as targeting your own body parts to eat.

You eat your own head
YOU HAVE BEEN STRUCK DOWN!

Jelle

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Post-Scarcity Thread
« Reply #22 on: October 11, 2014, 06:50:14 am »

if everyone on the planet each had a magic box with a button on it that every time anyone pressed it, a paperclip magically materialized inside the box...would you claim that paperclips were scarce because the work of pushing the button was required to generate paperclips?
Since the creation of the paperclip is a production process, and human labor, no matter how trivial, is not infinite, the paperclips are a limited resource and therefore scarce. That's going by the definition of scarcity I can find anyway, I haven't studied economics.

Go away and post in another thread. You're having a different conversation than anyone else is.
Well that's a little rude...
Logged

hops

  • Bay Watcher
  • Secretary of Antifa
    • View Profile
Re: Post-Scarcity Thread
« Reply #23 on: October 11, 2014, 06:52:43 am »

I think the meaning of non-scarce resources are that the resources are more numerous than human needs and wants.
If there were rivers of diamonds and everything is made out of diamonds, even though the diamond are still limited, they are not scarce.
Logged
she/her. (Pronouns vary over time.) The artist formerly known as Objective/Cinder.

One True Polycule with flame99 <3

Avatar by makowka

Jelle

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Post-Scarcity Thread
« Reply #24 on: October 11, 2014, 07:04:38 am »

Yes there does seem to be some confusion as to the exact definition. I see some sources claim any limited good is scarce, while others say any limited good where supply is less than demand.

Here's what I based on.
In economics, scarcity refers to limitations--limited goods or services, limited time, or limited abilities to achieve the desired ends. [...] In fact, economists view everything people want, strive for, or can't achieve effortlessly as scarce.
Logged

alexandertnt

  • Bay Watcher
  • (map 'list (lambda (post) (+ post awesome)) posts)
    • View Profile
Re: Post-Scarcity Thread
« Reply #25 on: October 11, 2014, 07:15:44 am »

I think the meaning of non-scarce resources are that the resources are more numerous than human needs and wants.
If there were rivers of diamonds and everything is made out of diamonds, even though the diamond are still limited, they are not scarce.

Thats what "non-scarce resources" may mean, but not "post-scarcity society"

One important aspect of a post-scarcity society is, and the one I have the biggest issue in the context of internet services:

Quote
people would be free to pursue whatever they wished and you don't HAVE to spend all day working in McDonald's so you don't get turfed out of your apartment

Which is far from reality for many people working to provide various services, including internet services. Like me. If I quit my job, I get turfed out of my apartment, and if people start pushing that button more, my job gets harder (they generally resist hiring more people, probably because free projects generally have a rather limited budget. For some reason).
« Last Edit: October 11, 2014, 07:18:17 am by alexandertnt »
Logged
This is when I imagine the hilarity which may happen if certain things are glichy. Such as targeting your own body parts to eat.

You eat your own head
YOU HAVE BEEN STRUCK DOWN!

Sergarr

  • Bay Watcher
  • (9) airheaded baka (9)
    • View Profile
Re: Post-Scarcity Thread
« Reply #26 on: October 11, 2014, 08:22:09 am »

I'd advocate for 3D printers for everyone, combined with the 3D material producer and re-cycler.

Then add in effective cheap full-spectrum solar panels, and an electromagnetic water desalination, and we're pretty much set for a post-scarcity relative to the basic necessities.
Logged
._.

Cthulhu

  • Bay Watcher
  • A squid
    • View Profile
Re: Post-Scarcity Thread
« Reply #27 on: October 11, 2014, 08:28:36 am »

100% recycling and total automation isn't post-scarcity and is also thermodynamically unlikely.

I would put that under the second of my three futures.

1.  Post-scarcity.  I don't believe this one will happen.  If it does, nice.  If it doesn't, no surprises for me.

2.  Non-progressive "low-impact" society.  That is, a new paradigm more akin to pre-modern configurations where expansion of our means and way of life is not seen as necessarily a good thing.  If high-tech society still exists it has a limited scope and doesn't attempt to colonize the rest of humanity which is why it remains ecologically sustainable.  I don't think this one will happen on its own but it might happen after 3.

3.  We continue on our present course under the assumption that A. Post-scarcity will occur, B. Jesus will occur, or C. No assumptions or thoughts on the subject at all.  Eventually we exceed the physical limits of our planet's capacity to sustain us and in the ensuing ecological disaster, violence over resources, collapse of the resource networks you and I rely on to get our food each day, society as we know it breaks down.  Most people die.  I see this one as inevitable at this point.  It's just a matter of when and how bad and what happens after.
Logged
Shoes...

Sergarr

  • Bay Watcher
  • (9) airheaded baka (9)
    • View Profile
Re: Post-Scarcity Thread
« Reply #28 on: October 11, 2014, 08:58:41 am »

100% recycling and total automation isn't post-scarcity and is also thermodynamically unlikely.

I would put that under the second of my three futures.

1.  Post-scarcity.  I don't believe this one will happen.  If it does, nice.  If it doesn't, no surprises for me.

2.  Non-progressive "low-impact" society.  That is, a new paradigm more akin to pre-modern configurations where expansion of our means and way of life is not seen as necessarily a good thing.  If high-tech society still exists it has a limited scope and doesn't attempt to colonize the rest of humanity which is why it remains ecologically sustainable.  I don't think this one will happen on its own but it might happen after 3.

3.  We continue on our present course under the assumption that A. Post-scarcity will occur, B. Jesus will occur, or C. No assumptions or thoughts on the subject at all.  Eventually we exceed the physical limits of our planet's capacity to sustain us and in the ensuing ecological disaster, violence over resources, collapse of the resource networks you and I rely on to get our food each day, society as we know it breaks down.  Most people die.  I see this one as inevitable at this point.  It's just a matter of when and how bad and what happens after.
The bolded part is incorrect because you forget to account for the sun energy.

And the post-capitalism society as I envision it would be the most resistant to the society collapses because everybody can create most of the things needed for survival.
Logged
._.

jefam99

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Post-Scarcity Thread
« Reply #29 on: October 11, 2014, 11:17:38 am »

in this post-scarcity society, are girlfriends regularly available, because if not, then we are back to wars over resources (just another resource people seem to leave out when thinking of free everything)
Logged
The doomsday lever would look like any other.  It would be surrounded by the various levers needed in the day to day life of the fortress, such as irrigation or raising the main drawbridge or operating the noble shower chamber.  None of the levers would be labeled.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5