... the point isn't whether they involved non-violent people or not. It's whether police reaction was appropriate or not -- it's their bloody
job to deal with violent people, and "deal with" does not equate "kill". The testimony regarding brown is fairly well available at this point (check the thread, there's been bucketloads of discussion on it), and wilson acted in a way that was pretty much explicitly calculated to escalate the situation, instead of de-escalate -- he acted more or less the polar opposite of how a police officer should act, and lo and behold, dead person. The burden of responsibility for the situation that happened is not equal -- it
can't be equal when one participant is a civilian and the other is an armed and trained officer of the law. And even if it was, most of the evidence we have points pretty strongly to wilson being the disproportionate cause of the situation that happened
And nah, the one where the cops gunned down the kid hasn't been something folks just went, "Yeah, that's fair". There's been fairly notable reaction against it. The only reason there hasn't been more is because the situation got spun to hell and back, last I checked in on it.
There's plenty of cases of cops killing or brutalizing non-violent people, though, if you're looking for it. It's been relatively common for a while now. That's honestly part of the reason it doesn't get more news -- because to a sad extent, it's
not news.