Tolyk:
Also, Nerjin is a third party, pretty sure. Otherwise he just has a post restriction that doesn't allow him to say that he has a post restriction.
What are you seeing in Nerjin's responses that leads you to be pretty sure he is third party?
Jack A T:
Imp: I find your response to Varee's question interesting, largely for the pragmatism and the lack of comments about etiquette. Do you believe there to be any situations in which you would feel comfortable lying about your real life circumstances for an advantage?
Only thing that comes to mind is outside the bounds of probability and certainly isn't happening now: someone threatening me with IRL consequence unless I lied about it. I'm not interested in making such lies for an in game advantage, and I don't see possible in game advantage to be gained from doing so either.
Varee's reply
193 left me with some concerns about his intentions and strategies as a player.
There's a difference between lacking etiquette oneself and discussing an etiquette-sensitive concept without mentioning etiquette at all. If a player does not already view it as wrong to use lies about real life circumstances, how convincing is a discussion about the etiquette they lack likely to be upon shaping their behavior? Other approaches exist; I used one.
Scripten: You've got some
unanswered questions still, but I've got more for you again.
4maskwolf: You're playing a creepy role, aren't you? Betcha mine is creepier.
nope. You're wrong about my role.
Your's would be, naturally. It's hard to get any less creepy than my role.
Scripten: Why the role question right off of the bat?
Banter. I thought you were trying to (heh) role play something creepy.
At the time you posted your question to 4maskwolf, wolf had made only
two posts. What did you see in those two short posts that you interpreted as creepy roleplay? What role did you see him roleplaying as, and why did you offer a bet that yours was creepier?
Okay, at this juncture, I really should clarify that my vote was still RVS. I just prefer my RVS votes to have SOME sort of game-related justification. Though, I appreciate the more in-depth examination of theory.
Also, all this role playing is quite fun. I hadn't been in a BYOR until now, so it's a nice change.
You state your vote was RVS, and that you want your RVS votes to have a game-related justification, and that you appreciate the examination of theory.
Do you believe that stating that your vote is RVS weakens or strengthens it?
You haven't exactly been pressuring or questioning except with your vote and you haven't been posting very much; are you satisfied with the effects you perceive that your play has so far?
Silthuri: You mentioned you are bad with RVS questions, and that you're so far just skimming through posts to catch questions addressed to you, though you did mention you'd reread Sunday.
How will you know when we leave the RVS stage, what marks that change to you?