Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Scripten]

You may have? Did you, or did you not? Keep in mind that, if the mafia knows your mask, then by concealing it, you are only harming the town. We want the mafia to have the least amount of extra information possible.

[flabort]

Poor Emutant.

TolyK, your query: Check my post at #99. I asked Jiokuy about Intermittent. His response is post 108.

Also, I might point out that I've been trying to breadcrumb my role for a while now. I asked Tiruin what "Plagues ail [her]" in post 74, *cough*ed in post 81. I also asked about how many people took unable to vote early on, ironically to Toaster, before anyone actually having it ever became an issue, and shortly after I submitted my action, but before it got processed. I see that I questioned TolyK about Changeling thoroughly earlier, and since I didn't get a victim claim from him then, I guess that lessens my suspicion of him now.

[4maskwolf]

I recommend you don't kill me, as I think I can prove something important at the beginning of tomorrow.

Prove what, how? There's no reason to play so damn secretively.

There is, actually...
I may have given out my mask, and thus might be screwed over by mafia. I don't want to have any specifics out yet, but if I can't prove it you'll have good ground for lynching me tomorrow.

We are not giving you a chance to pull off whatever plan you guys have concocted over there in the scumchat.  Everything makes sense now that I know you don't have a vote.  I thought that you were just doing a bad job hiding that you had a doublevoter ability, but apparently not.  You were just worried that the changeling who hit you was going to find you out if you claimed nonvoter.  In doing so, you managed to dig your own grave.

TolyK, not that it changes anything.  It just feels better to have my "vote" on someone who I suspect, because I feel less useless.  Because I am useless right now, since I don't have a vote.

Tomorrow, however, I will be slightly less useless! Yay me... useless to the last inch.

Poor Emutant.

TolyK, your query: Check my post at #99. I asked Jiokuy about Intermittent. His response is post 108.

Also, I might point out that I've been trying to breadcrumb my role for a while now. I asked Tiruin what "Plagues ail [her]" in post 74, *cough*ed in post 81. I also asked about how many people took unable to vote early on, ironically to Toaster, before anyone actually having it ever became an issue, and shortly after I submitted my action, but before it got processed. I see that I questioned TolyK about Changeling thoroughly earlier, and since I didn't get a victim claim from him then, I guess that lessens my suspicion of him now.

Of course he didn't claim.  He knew that a changeling had stolen damning evidence, so he kept his mouth shut.

[4maskwolf]

Oh, and Flabort: the changeling was processed a day before I got back(I think.  Was Friday the 25th?), fyi.  Not that it really matters, but that's the reason I didn't claim unable to vote before you sent it in: I couldn't, due to absence.

[TolyK]

Well then, Mr. Wolf, how do I know that a certain someone with blatant targeted themselves within the last few hours? It will be visible on day end. Did you have blatant attached, and did you really action Scarlet?

[TolyK]

Last question was to flabort, by the way. And I'll probably try to go to sleep now... >.>

[flabort]

No, I don't have blatant, and yes I really action'd Scarlet.

Also, 4mask, that's exactly my point. You didn't claim it until after I gave it to someone. Being absent doesn't mean that you couldn't have been the one to receive my Unable to Vote flaw. However, I'm willing to believe it wasn't you.

[TolyK]

What I meant was, did you changeling off blatant as part of the package? No, right?

[4maskwolf]

Well then, Mr. Wolf, how do I know that a certain someone with blatant targeted themselves within the last few hours? It will be visible on day end. Did you have blatant attached, and did you really action Scarlet?

*frowns*
*checks powers list*
Free-track/patrol and power cop?

That would be what was required to know who actioned themself and that they had blatant.

Otherwise, gossip or scumbuddy.

[TolyK]

Problem is, nobody will claim that they're chrome to counterclaim. That would mean my scum buddy would have to have done it if not me.
It'd be great if somebody could confirm what I'm saying at least partially, them I'll know who my scum buddy is.)

 Yes. I am Chrome, better than Safari.

And I hate you all due to making me claim this much.

It's four in the morning. 0.0

[4maskwolf]

Problem is, nobody will claim that they're chrome to counterclaim. That would mean my scum buddy would have to have done it if not me.
It'd be great if somebody could confirm what I'm saying at least partially, them I'll know who my scum buddy is.)

 Yes. I am Chrome, better than Safari.

And I hate you all due to making me claim this much.

It's four in the morning. 0.0

Go to sleep, bud.  That post made no sense in or out of context.

Once you've woken up, what the hell did that post mean?

[flabort]

I've already posted what I used to have and what I have now, and Blatant was nowhere in them.

Me Before	Me now
Free Innate Changeling (10)	Free Innate Changeling (10)
Inflate (1)	Kill (6)
Afflicted (-2)	Cleanse (2)
Hardcore (-1)	Flexible (2)
Unable to vote (-2)	Hardcore (-1)
	Intermittent (-2)
------------	-----------
Scarlet before	Scarlet now
Kill (6)	Inflate (1)
Cleanse (2)	Afflicted (-2)
Flexible (2)	Hardcore (-1)
Hardcore (-1)	Unable to Vote (-2)
Intermittent (-2)

I don't see how Blatant has anything to do with the current case?

PPE: Yeah, go to sleep. You're making less sense than usual.

[TolyK]

Wait, I've apparently made no sense nearly the whole game.

I'm chrome.
I have blatant, I actioned myself, this will show up. Ergo, I couldn't have been the target of flabort or anyone.
I could only fake claim this if this was my scum buddies situation, which I'll not entirely sure of but seems right enough. Nobody else in their right mind will claim chrome.

This is my proof, which I hinted at before when I said "(for later)" or the likes.

The party before the parenthesis was a joke.

G' night)

[4maskwolf]

Heh.

Teehee.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

I just realized something.

Flabort could prove his towniness by killing three people tomorrow.

The method: sell free innate changeling, buy free on kill as well as prolific, and mow down three people.  He could also sell cleanse and buy unstoppable, just for shits and giggles.

I'm not suggesting he do that, I just realized it was an option (and I thought it was amusing).

This would prove his towniness because scum as a whole can't make more than one kill a day, so three kills would confirm that at least two of them came from him.

Also, there's more to this message than you think there is.  Search closely, and you will find it.  Or be NQT, who'll find it immediately.

[notquitethere]

Correct