Anyway, let's look back at
NQT:
Here, 24 hours after game start, he's already talking about the vote leader (barely) getting lynched. He said later on that...
I was a bit confused over how much longer the day was going to be, but that's not really an excuse.
Yet before he first said it...
Do you think you're going to be engaged enough with the game to be able to give your reads on Friday?
...he mentioned the game end time. Hmm.
Digging deeper on the
second time he asked that type of question, I notice all his questions are requests for the target to refine their case and/or read. While that is all well and good, he's doing so in lieu of offering his own opinions.
This following post is more of the same. While he does offer "reads" of people, they're actually all noncommittal.
Does commit and read
in this post.
Chasing people about their reads (and lack thereof) is a perfectly fine tactic, but not if you don't provide your own. I'm seeing now that NQT has been postponing his reads up for one "big reveal" at the end. I'm still digesting on this whether it's truly being done on a scummy level, but he's at best borderline.
To boil it down to one sentence, my vote came because I didn't trust your intentions.
Also, NQT, I'm not going to enumerate people I have weak/no read on; I'm going to be hitting the high points. If you want to know what I think about a particular player, ask me.
Persus:
notquitethere:
I like your table of reads. Looks like most people think Jack A T is town, ZU is scummy, and Tiruin is null or slight scum.
What conclusions do you draw from this?
Read on Persus: I'm not particularly impressed with his level of content, but I haven't actually seen him do anything outright negative. No negative lean, but keeping an eye out for him.
Toony is being really uncharacteristically quiet. Besides his vote on 4mask and ZU (the latter not strong), pretty much all the content he posted was in his read post, which was minimum-effort and noncommittal. Just look at these:
4maskwolf - just as hyper as IG but has nothing to show for it, super defensive and reactive, doesn't believe IG's claim either I think? It depends on the weather.
zombie urist - same play as usual, could easily be scum from my experience playing games with him
Ottofar - same as ZU
notquitethere - feels on edge, just as protective as 4maskwolf, I don't suspect him enough right now to lynch this day
Tiruin - seems halfhearted, could just be busy
Jim Groovester - same as Tiruin
Imperial Guardsman - very likely a third-party like he claims, has a 50% revive so he's like a priest we can't trust or rely on, posts way too much
Toaster - nothing exceedingly suspicious, doesn't believe IG's claim
flabort - probably town power role, probably gonna die
Jack A T - haven't had a problem with any of his posts, no scum reads
Jiokuy - seems genuine, no issues yet
Persus13 - same as Jack A T
About the only real stands he makes here are NQT and 4mask. Toony, why are you coasting through D1?
Ottofar: I found one thing odd about him. During the IG Incident,
he unvotes 4mask to vote IG. He then drops this and never goes back to it. Ottofar, what happened to your 4mask case?
Zombie Urist has been busy with futbol and product launches. I was about to rip into him until
this post where he finally articulates cases on people. Still, awfully late to start taking a stand.
He does, however, get a black mark for his case on Persus:
Persus13: Almost none of his posts have any useful comments. He has never built a serious case on any person he voted for.
Until this post, this same statement was true for ZU.
Unvote NQT. I don't like what I've seen so far out of you, but at least you are coming forth with cases. Late, yes, but better than people like ZU are doing. Do know that I still do not trust your intentions, and you're still leaning a bit scummy.
ToonyMan, however, isn't really committing even when he pretends to do so.
As it turns out I dislike posting like this. I'd rather talk to people than about them. If someone's name isn't here, my read hasn't changed since last time I posted an opinion of them.