I can support an
extend for getting more out of certain people, especially people named Jim.
4mask:
Flabort, check your sources, according to my chart and the lurkertracker the last and only person voted by Toaster is NQT.
Why the hell did you answer this before he had a chance to? This is exactly the trap I was setting for him, and you went and warned him off. It is exactly this reason that people get mad over answering questions for other people.
Flabort:
I could full claim to prove that nobody is directly mentioned in my flavor, but that it does hint towards a lot of magic, and that it doesn't directly contradict his claim. In fact, since he claimed before I revealed my flavor, and his flavor points towards complimenting mine, he seems legit. Do you want me to full claim?
Fair enough. No, I don't want you to full claim. I'm about 90% sure what your role is, and I've certainly got it narrowed to a short list. Considering that, I see no benefit for you claiming further.
Who are you trying to kill?: NQT, 4mask, IG. You are so desperate to get one of them killed, consequences be damned.
You're not actually that desperate, but I'm pretty sure IG is pro-town at the moment, and the other two lean town for me.
Bullshit. Quote me trying to get 4mask killed.
And that read list I said I'd give:
Scummy, roughly most to least:
NQT
IG *More for his claim. I really do not trust it. His play is... spastic.
You, a bit, for spreading bullshit
Something about Jiokuy bugs me a bit, but I'm not sure what.
Townish read:
...Nobody, really. Everyone else hovers around null (or hasn't posted enough to give a read [Tiruin, Jim, ZU])
Wow that's a weak case.
At least you admit it.
NQT:
Zombie Urist
Does he only post from his phone?
Typically, yes.
Toaster, One of my goals for today is that whoever ends up being lynched, every player knows that they are responsible for it. That means everyone has to back a case. I'm not sure IG is the best target yet, hence why I'm still chasing other people up, but I'm sure I'm going to have a vote on someone for a good reason by the end of the day. Getting everyone's insight on the most interesting things to happen during the day increases engagement and gives us all more to work with. Scum want to stay silent when town are getting lynched for bad reasons, and, though they don't want to be obvious about it, they want to prevent their scumbuddies being lynched. Asking everyone about the players up for lynching makes it certain that scum will have commented on the lynch.
Does that all make sense? I'm not saying 'hey everyone, let's lynch such and such', I'm saying 'such and such is looking like they might be lynched, and if they are then you are partly culpable for letting it happen so what are your reasons?'
That reasoning is all well and good, but frankly I'm not sure I trust your intentions. The
first time you did it was two full days before day end. Just a bit over 24 hours from game start, even! That's waaay too far in advance to be playing that sort of card. You then did it again 12 hours later. Sure, getting people to talk is good, but I don't trust where you are going with this. It almost looks like you're setting up to drive a mislynch on someone D2 if they're on a mislynch today, especially the underlined bit in the quote above.