Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Crits.

Crits?

Crits!

Crits?!

Crits!?

Could you leave some enemies for the rest of us?

[Rolepgeek]

Solmyr, you have two options, I think.

A. Keep the <6=0 damage and watch as every axe wielder you face keeps a Hammer about him
Or
B. Reduce it to <4=0 and laugh as swords and some lances bounce off you.

And it didn't...look at the poll, 4 is winning.

[Sirus]

Hey, the armored 6 buff won fair and square. >:v So just bring axe-wielders or mages.

I'm seeing Solymr's idea with 6 votes to the default option's 4. What you talking about?

[Praefectus Screptum]

Hey, the armored 6 buff won fair and square. >:v So just bring axe-wielders or mages.

I'm seeing Solymr's idea with 6 votes to the default option's 4. What you talking about?

Considering the fact Serious voted on that one by accident, those aren't 6 votes at all. He wanted to vote on the other one according to the handbook.

[Rolepgeek]

So it's a tie.

[SeriousConcentrate]

Yeah, I explained it in a post when I did it. It's still tied 5-5, at least to me anyway.

ninja'd

[Solymr]

I was the one who suggested the 4 oneeeeee

[Sirus]

So since it's a tie, I guess we should leave it to GM's discretion.

[Rolepgeek]

Why not compromise at 5? I wouldn't normally suggest it, but 1.22 has it at 5, so...

[SeriousConcentrate]

I think the 'do this' vote was Swordstar, who said 'leave it at 6> if physical only and nerf it to 4> if it's for magic too', but since it's physical only that would make it a vote for option 1?

[Rolepgeek]

I said four for the same reason the GM's wanting to tune it down a bit; 6 isn't negligible damage. Yet. 4 kinda is, and the point if the ability is to prevent Knights from being worn down by otherwise negligible damage.

Plus, there is the risk of the GM solving the problem by introducing you to Captain Hammer.

Captain Hammer is scary.

[Sirus]

In any case, can folks get a move on IC? I think most everyone is online but no-one's doing anything :I

[Solymr]

Fine I'll pilum the noob in front of me.

Can't say I wasn't expecting that.

[Rolepgeek]

Seems like Powder Miner and Swordstar are all whose left to go. :p

[Swordstar]

As a warning, my activity for the next four or so days is probably going to be... spotty at best. Feel free to move me in this or any other RP if I haven't moved for ~24 hours.

[Swordstar]

So last night, when I was unable to fall asleep, I started getting ideas for Steampunk Emblem. It'd probably include a smaller set of classes that are similar but not identical to the current FEF ones, and would also include things like pistols, that are decent strength, neutral weapons that anyone can use, but you need to take a turn to reload if you want to use it again and also have a small chance of blowing up in your hand. It would also include things like airship battles that would be similar to navel battles but not quite the same and airships would have canons which I think would work something along the lines of: you fire the canon, I RNG which of x possible squares it hits, anyone on that square is KO'd and then that square isn't passable anymore unless you have a flying contraption. Also there'd be flying contraptions instead of pegasi and wyverns.