I think Mandela should have done far, far more to acknowledge and combat the spread of HIV/AIDS in South Africa and Africa as a whole. He should have done far more to condemn the course the ANC took after his departure leading right up to its current leader Jacob Zuma, who is looking more and more like an autocrat as time goes on. Corruption runs rampant in the ANC. The fact that Zuma could act the way that he does, crushing free speech and using deadly force on protestors, while Mandela would remain silent irritated me. Now I understand though that the man was so terribly weakened by his time in prison, his struggles with TB, advanced age and what looked to me like some kind of dementia that he did the best that he could for South Africa.
I don't need to dispense of the arguments about the Lockerbie bomber or Gaddafi or anything like that because Sheb has done enough. All I feel the need to say is that there are no saints in history. Contrary to what Loud Whispers says, there are
no paragons but Mandela, like Lincoln, is one of the closest examples of such people that you will see. There are some people that can be described as heroes and heroines, a description I prefer because it allows for acknowledgement of their flaws. "Paragon" implies some kind of mythical Christ-like figure. I would prefer to call Mandela a hero.
I am actually a frequent poster of Bay12, but I shall say this proxied to avoid drama. Why should I care? What does this do for Ukraine? Mandela is just another man.
Well Ukrainian Ranger, nothing directly. He just might inspire you though if you look at his life and his struggles for the independence of African people. The fact that he really was just another man makes it more powerful I think.