[Expletive] [
EXPLETIVE] this internet. Not even loading after I do stuff and press post and do stuff and refresh and then no post...
I shalt not touch ye, O brevity. For thy charms and thy words have interrupted my posts whenceforth!
I think I broke my pseudo-english translator. An-whoo, the bottom post is unedited. Everything past the horizontal rule below my stuffs equal responses and knowledge of me reading the next replies.
I am an Illusionist who has decided to renounce my ways and go as an Exorcist through the mystic arts!
Meaning: I'm an Illusionist. That's all I am. An Illusionist.N1:
I did not act. Firstly I began reflecting on how redirectors work--considering the many-potential roles they would serve, which spanned...quite a lot of personal arguments. Conclusion? I /felt/ they were anti-town
at the start,
especially during that time (Primary thought: me redirecting scum towards a target would be a valuable find, yet in doing so, if it was not the kill WHICH
I DID NOT RISK--would prove..more fallible than not in theory of proving upon action and reaction later on in-game.) A counter argument would be if people would be typing up the knots later on and discovered a shift in the plot. Something which I didn't want to bother with until I had evidence. Evidence coming in the form of 'what would people do if in case their ability--their
power to influence the game behind seeing eyes [figuratively..] was uninterrupted. Their response to N1. Their..well, reaction to a mutual stimulus that gives us all a certain bias towards
power roles than vanilla-no act roles.
The variety of roles, seeing their nebulous and numerous state, were too much of a conundrum at the time and guessing against my better notion {ie what if you hit a killer?} (A rare chance, but a 'you hit golden treasure' chance). Such a tempting notion, yet something I did not give much thought on as I was thinking more on 'what if I don't act?' and
basked in the effects.
I decided to play it safe and wait it out.
N2:
Persus to Toony. Caz is lynched. Hoorah? Heck yes. Problem being, I had suspect
s. Cmega was seemingly absent and his record was...splotchy. Using my power on him, though related to my thoughts on 'if I get the killer..' would be wholly ideal at the point though inhibited by a much greater affront to my thinking.
Persus.
Why him? He got the N1 note, and while I had (and detailed) a suspicious point at his person during the time being [D3], I was checking on reader-responses to it and whom would validate my suspicion on proving Persus as town. I kept my reading silent and pretended that it didn't affect my words at the time--acting as best, an observer and an innocent un-illusionist and directing knowledge of the illusionist in public, checking for any notice or significant reaction.
Guess who voted Persus? ToonyMan! One of my previous targets and suspects. Joyous be I, for whom speaks his words in my intrigue is he who is first to catch the snare!
...Though guess how much backing or context clues/evidence he had?
..
You tell me, please, as I couldn't get it from his post
here. I mean, I fully agree on the efficiency of a role--doubly so when evidence pops out and the response is lacking. However it..totally misses out the intervening variable of
Seer is a powerful role, and lies would be a no-no. However my 'this is darn weird' meter was killing me and I couldn't bend over that thought that it would remain AS SUCH given how I rationalized the solution on [IF X WAS REDIRECTED, THEN Y STRIKES TRUE AND VICE VERSA: Pertaining to how Imp OR Max should be correct]
And my confusion? He voted Persus instead of Imp.
..And this thing. Check the latest paragraph? I believe, at best, he was skimming and acted on role-significance.
Also if Persus did act to kill--given how it's a conjunctive scenario with his action (since he claimed Knight), t'would be an easy proof given my suspicion on Toony before. And unless Toony himself is a knight..well, he'll report it.
If no kill from my target happens, then Persus is 100% Town from the 99%.
N3:
Toony to Persus! Max is down. He flips scum. Prior to lynch, I had been planning on targeting whomever to whatever depending on if the one lynched hits up TOWN. Meaning either targeting those who had acted against the voted, and redirecting him/her against the only source I could find viable. Aye, people suspected others-NQT, perhaps? Sure. Fine. However Toony was a special mention to me. How he got around things, like he had a certain source of information rather than an erratic movement of thought. His actions (checking back--how he voted//FoS'd me a long way ago) were still of suspect, and I grabbed the opportunity to use my powers in such a way that nothing could go wrong.
The only source of my deed is a convenient guardian of our undisclosed liege-lord stationed conveniently in this town who conveniently fended off an attacker with good senses who conveniently stopped his own death on a (now-proven) convenient N1, and by empirical evidence, was the target of an attack by scum yesterday--an attack which I rationalized, would either be a failed spanner in the works (proving Imp more town than not, or rather a good bus) or Persus being town (or a DARN WELL GOOD BUS).
...The result stands before you as a corpse.
PPE: ...Everyone post-Persus. (That sounded latin to me. Argh, self. Nice going trying to find puns >.>)
ImpTiruin:
...And this. I skimmed over it to only register the lowermost paragraph in my mind that 'Imp wants NQT dead'.
Huh. Shame that. Least you read more now. What do you understand of my words there now? Do you agree, disagree? Is the entire meaning you get still that 'Imp wants NQT dead.', nothing else of meaning in that pretty short post?
I'm looking back at that time, thanks. I'm more along your side as town on the matter, though--yet on due reason because of what I said above and much less on how you and NQT performed.
Meaning: I'm reading back and cannot give a definitive or exact answer to this.
Only the hunter?
...He's the only one else who didn't claim other than what we know of today:
Persus - Knight.
Imp - Fortune Teller.
NQT - Priest
Me - Illusionist
Toaster - ? (now claimed Hunter)
..So yeah. I did mean it when I say I think it best, due to the note on being on the last scum (ie: 1:4 scenario). Said person may either have participated in the bus yesterday to bring in townie points--if in case the consensus was faulty against him/her. The base reason was that I know 3 (not exact, but claimed) claims, and thus why I asked a 'Toaster, are you the hunter' note.
NQTIn virtue of having the lowest number of suspicions, Tiruin is the top candidate. She was the last on the Max lynch but the first on the Caz lynch. In my next analytical post (coming very soon!) I will look at the cases and interactions-with known-scum of each player.
And this does not take in what I said as of yesterday? Interesting how your viewpoint is. Is it judging by superficial examination or have you gone in depth and seen something which I have not, in myself?
As we have either have a serial killer or a monster hunter with terrible judgement (I have a theory as to who it is but I might well be wrong), this is probably LYLO right now. As such we should be even more cautious than normal about who we lynch. Not right now, but before the end of the day we should all share our top scum picks in ranked order: this often works out quite well.
I fathom to how or why the former @ bolded portion. And what would lead you to conclude the adjective of the latter.
So let me ask: Why, on both counts?
I'm not sure what you mean by 'with the add-on of a silencer', but on Day 2 I made very clear my case on Jim and my own misgivings with it:
..Err, as in it wasn't made that obvious to the general audience--how everyone else swayed, to give a metaphor.
Well, I look forward to seeing whether your method bears fruit today if you do turn out to be town.
...Meaning whatnow? Pertaining to my method or..?
By Day 3, I came to realise that Jim mischaracterisation of our interaction was probably an honest mistake rather than a deliberate deception. You might have noticed by now that I'm not afraid to change my mind.
And the shift from Jim to the current voted at that time came..when? You realized it was an honest mistake based on what precise statement? What was the influencing note?
Toaster
N3 I didn't buy Toony's sudden switch from Max to Persus. Prior to NQT changing his vote, Toony was content with the Max lynch and had moved on to questioning others. When NQT switched to Persus, though...
@Orange: What persuaded you to
kill him based on this buying of actions? Is it relevant with the purple?
@Purple: ...And this caused you to kill him..why? It was scummy..how?
Buying such to
save a buddy..how?
Also
why did you kill Nerjin and compared to your reads at the time-which I ask you to state including a list of reads D3, and preferably now, too-what caused Nerjin to be a prime suspect to lay your sword on him?PPE: Four. Hi Tiruin!
o/
PPE
II:
NQT> Yep. Given that there's Toaster to clarify it out, yeah. That, and the interaction between Max and Persus going out in D3? Persus is pretty much my safe bet here.
...Also when I say notes, I was..eh. Badly worded. I was thinking about my notes as a whole, then thinking how I'd write it down in a non-purple-prose format. Sorry about that.