This is the problem I have with you demanding a second scum; you're obviously not stupid and you know how to avoid drawing attention to your teammates: why the hell would you leave an obvious interaction with someone else? As such I'm forced to resort to common scum-hunting to find my scum team rather than build a mental palace like yours where you are always correct. Now yes, there MIGHT be signs that will make sense in retrospect, but unless I can eliminate them on other grounds than their interaction with you; then I must consider them as possible scum team with you. If I don't, and follow your example of creating a hypothetical scum team in my mind and mention it I'm mentally handicapping myself if I get the first lynch right.
I don't really understand your logic. If the fact that I'm not stupid means that I'll never drop any kind of associative tell, couldn't you equally argue that the fact that I'm not stupid also means I'll never drop any kind of scumtell, and therefore there's no point in trying to call me scum at all? Much like regular scumtells, associative tells aren't a thing you can really avoid dropping.
In addition, I really don't see how it could be a mental handicap to be able to form a hypothetical version of the two-man scumteam that actually exists, rather than a hypothetical one-man scumteam that doesn't. But even if you really think it's impossible to identify two people as scum together, you could at least try to identify two people as scum separately. Because two mafia members exist and therefore it's dumb to only have one lynch preference.
Leafsnail:
I did my re-read of the day, but I can't shake the feeling that you are scum.
You have the worst case of tunnel vision I have ever seen. I will briefly respond to each of your points, and after that I'm not engaging you anymore since you clearly will not be convinced by anything.
Area 1: Your opening salvo targeted people who wouldn't be around to defend their positions.
This isn't and never has been a scumtell. The people who are away are no more or less likely to be scum than anyone else, and I was not aware of Dem's absence at the time I made that post even if you think that I should have been.
I mostly agreed with the Ranger lynch, and doing so made sense in the moment, the fact that it turned out wrong is disappointing, but I feel that you were trying to manipulate the town that just mislynched to target the people who were leading the lynch.
Lynching cop claims in this setup day one is a bad move. This is a basic point of mafia theory. I have explained why multiple times. Heck,
you explained why yesterday.
If I were scum I would be doing my best to build the disappointment about the lynch into a lynch on another townie who invested themselves too much into the lynch, or lynched under suspicious reasoning. This is the primary reason why I was so vicious about your case on Vector. Yes it was a valid reason to vote, but I feel a bit weak for a lynch case.
If you assume that I'm scum it does naturally follow that I'm scum, yes. If you remove that assumption, however, this point is nonsense.
You then support this case by pointing to Demdemeh as her potential scum buddy, saying that she must have ignored his play to keep attention away from it. This is odd to me as my understanding of Vector is that if she considered her scum buddy to be doing something stupid, she'd call them out on it and bus them.
Your understanding of Vector is wrong. In a setup like this, scum really cannot afford to bus day one, because a day one scum lynch puts the mafia at a terrible disadvantage, particularly if both a cop and a jailkeeper exist. I'd go as far as to say that even a mafia member who can perfectly blend in as town would seriously struggle to recover from that. Thus you would want to shield your buddies to a degree.
As such your intire initial case on Vector is that she "should have known better than to lynch a D1 cop claim" which again is stupid for the same reason: Vector, if she did "know better", probably wouldn't do so as this is a teaching game that she has been taking seriously.
Scum ICs are neither required nor expected to work with the town. I don't know why you think they are, but they are not.
Area 2: You keep saying things that seem to me to be: "If I'm scum and you are honestly suspicious of me you should have opinions on X, Y and Z." It feels to me like you are trying to control my case against you to keep it on the places where you are not suspicious. The most blatant one to my eyes is your insistence that I finger a potential partner for you.
Say what I will: you are more experienced at this game than I am. I don't know how you interact with your partners, and me looking for it will only be speculation. The goal of scum in this game is to act like town, blatantly indicating your partner is stupid and not something you'd be likely to do. So why do you keep asking my to examine you in specific, unhelpful, ways? I can only see it as you trying to control my hunting of you, which is something I can only see scum as doing.
"controlling my hunting of you" isn't in any way a scumtell, and I don't even understand why you think it is considering that a town player would equally want you to unvote them. And again, if you think I'm a perfect mafia player who would never drop any kind of associative tell, wouldn't that also mean all your attempts to lynch me are meaningless because I'll never drop an individual tell either?