yes, because I know I am not scum, and a no-lynch is better than a town-lynch.
I don't want to have to do that.
Wow. That comes off as super scummy to me. Scum has huge motivation to do this, and town has less. If you were scum, you would definitely employ this strategy, at least prolonging your own lynching by a day and wasting one of towns' days to catch the rest of the scum. If you are town, it would have much the same effect. You would probably be able to delay your lynching for at least a day, and make the town waste a day in the process. The result would be a town lynch AND a no-lynch. Either of these are less destructive then both together. What I see in this statement is you saying that you value yourself over the town as a whole. There'd be no reason to do so unless you were scum.
I have a hypothetical for you. Let's say you make us no-lynch today because you vote Nerjin, and tie the votes. The next day, you're about to be lynched. Would you attempt to tie up the votes then again? Would you no-lynch your way to a lynch or lose scenario just so you don't get lynched yourself? Your reasoning is destructive and the practice of it and reasoning like it would likely lead to the downfall of this town.
RangerCado: I think that Nerjin-san isn't scum, but merely, as he said, a very bad player. You are right in what you say about him, but do these really come off as scumtells to you? They just look like someone who's lazy regardless of whether they're scum or not. I've played a game with Nerjin, and he acted much the same as he's doing right now.
Captain Ford: I recognize your point about the lynchee not ensuring that they get lynched, but avoiding being lynched by voting someone else that you don't even think is scum is absolutely scummy, in my opinion.