Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Poll

STO: Good game or not?

Yes
No
Other

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15 ... 26

Author Topic: Star Trek Discussion Thread  (Read 29575 times)

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #180 on: March 15, 2013, 12:38:20 pm »

Say what you will about enterprise its biggest fault was that it was just boring.

Oddly enough my purity made me not realise half of what was going on and in fact I didn't realise this until I read the reviews. I had no idea they kept trying to force sex appeal onto the show. Honestly when Tpol started giving massages I thought it was just the captain setting them up. I didn't know it was there because "Tpol is sexy guys! sex!".

As for Archer the character. I think the problem is he didn't feel like a main character. He was the captain, he was the most important person on the ship, but he didn't feel like it. He is so passive.
« Last Edit: March 15, 2013, 12:44:14 pm by Neonivek »
Logged

Jervill

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #181 on: March 15, 2013, 01:27:41 pm »

They toned down the blatant fanservice after the first two seasons, thankfully.

Anyway, Star Trek Into Darkness comes out in May.  I liked Star Trek XI even with some of its "science" issues; I hope the new one improves on the 2009 film.
« Last Edit: March 15, 2013, 01:31:57 pm by Jervill »
Logged

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #182 on: March 15, 2013, 01:44:57 pm »

They toned down the blatant fanservice after the first two seasons, thankfully.

And replaced it with really hammy pairing.

Logged

trekkie5249

  • Bay Watcher
  • Phaser Rifleman
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #183 on: March 15, 2013, 04:57:51 pm »

Archer (especially in the early seasons) is a horrible character who constantly and needlessly puts his crew at risk, and at the behest of Phlox, deliberately allows an entire alien race to perish when it was in their means to help.  He displays a total lack of common sense in any given situation, ignoring obvious and smarter alternatives to insane courses of action, and he frequently spouts lazily-written nonsense which we're supposed to think is wisdom.

He was a cherry on the sundae of failure that was Enterprise.  NX-01 was the ship of the damned.

Also, Archer is USELESS in a fight! Kirk>Archer because Kirk kicked ass, while Archer got his ass kicked.
Logged
The only problem with The Next Generation was Wesley never had a terrible airlock or engineering bay related accident that left just slush.

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #184 on: March 15, 2013, 05:53:56 pm »

I think Picard kicked more butt then Archer and he is OLD!
Logged

Sergius

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #185 on: March 15, 2013, 06:08:24 pm »

Picard would just make their clothes fall off with his mind.
Logged

Neonivek

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #186 on: March 15, 2013, 06:09:32 pm »

Picard would just make their clothes fall off with his mind.

Like the cast of enterprise need a reason to get their clothes off.
Logged

Sergius

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #187 on: March 15, 2013, 08:58:07 pm »

Picard would just make their clothes fall off with his mind.

Like the cast of enterprise need a reason to get their clothes off.

Because of the surgically-grafted catsuits, duh.
Logged

Xantalos

  • Bay Watcher
  • Your Friendly Salvation
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #188 on: March 15, 2013, 09:02:01 pm »

Picard would just make their clothes fall off with his mind.

Like the cast of enterprise need a reason to get their clothes off.
Like Picard needs to do anything for that to happen other than stand there.
Logged
Sig! Onol
Quote from: BFEL
XANTALOS, THE KARATEBOMINATION
Quote from: Toaster
((The Xantalos Die: [1, 1, 1, 6, 6, 6]))

trekkie5249

  • Bay Watcher
  • Phaser Rifleman
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #189 on: March 15, 2013, 09:44:14 pm »

Picard would just make their clothes fall off with his mind.

Like the cast of enterprise need a reason to get their clothes off.
Like Picard needs to do anything for that to happen other than stand there.

His glare alone has been known to kill the weak-spirited
Logged
The only problem with The Next Generation was Wesley never had a terrible airlock or engineering bay related accident that left just slush.

Xantalos

  • Bay Watcher
  • Your Friendly Salvation
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #190 on: March 15, 2013, 09:54:19 pm »

Picard would just make their clothes fall off with his mind.

Like the cast of enterprise need a reason to get their clothes off.
Like Picard needs to do anything for that to happen other than stand there.

His glare alone has been known to kill the weak-spirited
So he was essentially the Emperor of Mankind on vacation, and Q was ... Q?
Logged
Sig! Onol
Quote from: BFEL
XANTALOS, THE KARATEBOMINATION
Quote from: Toaster
((The Xantalos Die: [1, 1, 1, 6, 6, 6]))

trekkie5249

  • Bay Watcher
  • Phaser Rifleman
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #191 on: March 15, 2013, 10:01:28 pm »

Picard would just make their clothes fall off with his mind.

Like the cast of enterprise need a reason to get their clothes off.
Like Picard needs to do anything for that to happen other than stand there.

His glare alone has been known to kill the weak-spirited
So he was essentially the Emperor of Mankind on vacation, and Q was ... Q?

No, he was just that much of a badass. (Picard)
Logged
The only problem with The Next Generation was Wesley never had a terrible airlock or engineering bay related accident that left just slush.

trekkie5249

  • Bay Watcher
  • Phaser Rifleman
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #192 on: March 18, 2013, 08:04:57 pm »

Ok, I'm steering this in a new direction. Why would you love/hate to be Spock.
Logged
The only problem with The Next Generation was Wesley never had a terrible airlock or engineering bay related accident that left just slush.

Sirus

  • Bay Watcher
  • Resident trucker/goddess/ex-president.
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #193 on: March 18, 2013, 08:09:06 pm »

Eh. Spock's fine, but I don't think I'd particularly want to be him. Not sure if I'd like to be any other species, for that matter. I like my own little human quirks.
Logged
Quote from: Max White
And lo! Sirus did drive his mighty party truck unto Vegas, and it was good.

Star Wars: Age of Rebellion OOC Thread

Shadow of the Demon Lord - OOC Thread - IC Thread

Solifuge

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek Discussion Thread
« Reply #194 on: March 18, 2013, 09:16:39 pm »

Honestly, Sisko from DS9 is starting to grow on me. Maybe it's just the emotional vulnerability he gives away in the first few episodes, but he's the most human and relatable captain I've yet seen on Trek. He's not the paragon of Virtue and Hardassery that is Picard, nor the Showboating Man's Man that is Kirk. He's got a kid who he cares about, but isn't too great with. He's got both friendships and grudges with different members of his crew. He's got a position with a lot of responsibility that he takes seriously, but he isn't afraid to bend the rules when it's for the greater good. And he's got all the cunning and leadership a good captain needs to keep a space-city floating, out in the fringes of the Federation.

I mean, check out this monologue... So much character depth! So much intrigue! So much morally-grey territory! I especially love the part at the end. How Sisko repeats to himself "I can live with it," as though repeating it enough would make it true.

Chills, man.
« Last Edit: March 18, 2013, 09:43:47 pm by Solifuge »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15 ... 26