Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Fenrir]

Not you, Xantalos! The other eldritch creature from beyond space and time.

[Xantalos]

Not you, Xantalos! The other eldritch creature from beyond space and time.

Oh yeah that guy.
Did you know he killed his wife and then covered up the fact that he was ever married?

[mcclay]

But..I...I like being circumscribed ...

[penguinofhonor]

.

[Loud Whispers]

But..I...I like being circumscribed ...

You will accept your foreskin and you will enjoy it D:<

At least when science gets around to growing foreskins on trees.

[Sir Finkus]

Well, we're learning all kinds of new things about each other aren't we!  Is anyone making a list?

[moocowmoo]

Ok so apparently circumcision reducing sexual pleasure is old news. It is done to approx 13 millions boys globally every year, compared with 2 million girls who are circumcised annually. The latter has been categorized into 4 different types measuring degree of harm, the former is all lumped into one designation, and generally treated as harmless save for total amputation. One is a joke, the other is a a cruel atrocity, that must be stopped regardless of culture, religion, or perceived medical benefits. I guess if female circumcision were common in our culture, people would be making jokes about it. So it goes.

[Xantalos]

I remember you from somewhere. I think it was the circumcision derail last year.

[Sappho]

Hey so I'm a lady. And as a lady who has been with *several* dudes, from the lady's point of view alone (granting that I have never had a penis and can't offer a firsthand perspective), uncircumcised penises are WAY more fun and physically attractive, despite what American pornography might suggest.

Anyway, I'd be most interested in hearing the point of view of someone who had an uncircumcised penis and then, as an adult, got a circumcision. That person has considerable weight in the discussion of which variety of penis is better overall. Other than that... Does anyone really have the experience necessary to offer an opinion truly worthy of consisderation?

[Aklyon]

Well, here's an interesting thread.

[moocowmoo]

I remember you from somewhere. I think it was the circumcision derail last year.

I wonder how many million circumcisions were performed on children since then?

[Xantalos]

I remember you from somewhere. I think it was the circumcision derail last year.

I wonder how many million circumcisions were performed on children since then?

Not sure.
Also having trouble caring, but then that's because I'm somewhat of an emotionless psychopath. Eh.

[moocowmoo]

I remember you from somewhere. I think it was the circumcision derail last year.

I wonder how many million circumcisions were performed on children since then?

Not sure.
Also having trouble caring, but then that's because I'm somewhat of an emotionless psychopath. Eh.

Do you care about female circumcision? If you don't, why not crack some jokes about it? There aren't even any victims here to offend.

[Leafsnail]

Ok so apparently circumcision reducing sexual pleasure is old news. It is done to approx 13 millions boys globally every year, compared with 2 million girls who are circumcised annually. The latter has been categorized into 4 different types measuring degree of harm, the former is all lumped into one designation, and generally treated as harmless save for total amputation. One is a joke, the other is a a cruel atrocity, that must be stopped regardless of culture, religion, or perceived medical benefits. I guess if female circumcision were common in our culture, people would be making jokes about it. So it goes.

Most forms of FGM (at least the first three types) are a lot more extreme than male circumcision so that is why.

[moocowmoo]

Ok so apparently circumcision reducing sexual pleasure is old news. It is done to approx 13 millions boys globally every year, compared with 2 million girls who are circumcised annually. The latter has been categorized into 4 different types measuring degree of harm, the former is all lumped into one designation, and generally treated as harmless save for total amputation. One is a joke, the other is a a cruel atrocity, that must be stopped regardless of culture, religion, or perceived medical benefits. I guess if female circumcision were common in our culture, people would be making jokes about it. So it goes.

Most forms of FGM (at least the first three types) are a lot more extreme than male circumcision so that is why.

Do you know how many of the 2 million annually fall into the first three categories? Meanwhile for the 13 million we have only two outcomes: success or death/amputation.