the united kingdom was settled by malvinian aborigan tribes in 31488 bc and therefore londonian island malvinians should return themselves into the fold
Whilst snipping through Malvinas I found this gem:
The Gurkhas were truly feared by the Argentine troops. Writer Gabriel Barcia Marquez quoted witnesses as saying that the Gurkhas:
…beheaded Argentine soldiers with their assassins' scimitars and were so bloodthirsty that the English had to handcuff them to stop further killing after the Argentines had surrendered.
Argentinian propaganda during the war backfired when Argie conscripts surrendered or fled immediately rather than face the Gurkhas. They started to believe Argie propaganda when British media just showed images of the Gurkhas sharpening their khukris.
For those who don't know, the Ghurkas are 4ft tall Nepalese soldiers who are indestructible and possessed of determination unmatched by anyone else alive. They don't eat people and are not possessed of any passions moreso than your average guy, and far from being uncontrollable war machines they are amongst the most disciplined fighting forces out there (but don't tell the Malvinians that). They have however on occasion been disciplined for beheading people on the modern battlefield. Generally nice people all around, and as soldiers you can rarely ask for better.
The outspoken senior figure of Surrey's police force has claimed illegal migrants could be stopped from entering the UK by having "Gurkha regiments at the Channel Tunnel".
Send in the armed forces, but the Gurkhas? Might be a tad bit overkill. They scare me, quite a bit. I suppose that's the point though, they'd be one hell of a deterrent.
*EDIT
Top lel, reading sjws complaining about Gurkha efficiency at killing commies amuses me deeply. One man's commie is another's maxist-leninist freedom fighter.