I don't get you. My point is that Greece's current debts are way too high. I pointed out that there is only one single example of a country paying such a high amount of debt. You said Germany was a second exemple. I pointed out that it did not since it got a large haircut, plus amazing conditions on repayment.
Well, it went 'Germany paid its debt' --> 'Germany got help!' --> 'Greece got help too!'.
The haircut alone, lowered the government debt pile by €106.5bn (equal to a debt-to-GDP ratio decline of 55.0 percentage points), but as Greek banks at the same time were holding almost 1/3 of the restructured debt, this also created the need for the Troika and Greek government to pay for a €48.2bn bank recapitalisation in 2012, which added back an additional 24.9 percentage points to the debt-to-GDP ratio. So all in all the net impact of the debt restructure in March 2012, was that it lowered the debt-to-GDP ratio with 30.1 percentage points.
30% vs 50% certainly is smaller, but hardly insignificant. And Greece has no destroyed country to rebuild and millions of refugees to integrate.
And IIRC (and the German media haven't reported blatant misinformation...) the repayment conditions for Greece are pretty good too. I read something like that even today: Schäuble's balanced budget would not be in danger if Greece stopped payments, because those payments aren't due for another ten years...
What needs to be kept in mind: The treatment Greece got is politically motivated, not economically. Economically Keynesianism makes sense - maniac's right in that regard -, but insisting that this crisis has no political elements is being either blind or dishonest.