It's complete and utter bullshit and hyperbole.
I must say it's not a very informative answer.
The state enforces their experimental progressive agenda by starting early to shape it inhabitants. Today – as a part of the governmentally regulated school plan – a chief function of the public schools is to erase gender identity. They do this by forcing boys to play with dolls, and girls to play with cars and guns. Even calling a boy “boy” and a girl “girl” is viewed as obsolete.
The state wants every schoolfunction to refer to every person with the made up and so called “gender neutral” word “hen”. Hen is made up by the radical feminist think tanks that are an influential part of the Swedish establishment. The use is similar to the praxis “citoienne” in revolutionary France, or “comrade” in the communist states.
That for example. Is that just a fairytale from him?
Swedish State Television shows information programs for the Swedish youth – 13 to 16 – on how to have sex with immigrants and disabled.
Or that?
Some politicians propose mandatory day care for two year olds.
What about that?
I apologize, Ranger, I missed your post before. For those quotes in particular:
1. "The State" enforces nothing such at all. The only schools that have had any form of gender-neutral agendas have been private schools or local initiatives in individual schools. Schools and daycare centers have very high self-determination here, which is yet another reason "the State" can't enforce anything. It's not the way the system works here.
As for "hen", it is simply a suggestion from a minority of people that it be used, and hardly anybody uses it. As for the word itself it is just a gender neutral third person pronomen as we only hqve genderbound such otherwise for people ("han" and "hon" for people - as you can see "hen" is just a variation of those - respectively "den"/"det" for objects and non-human beings). It has absolutely no similarity to "comrade" and "the State" gives absolutely not a single shit about whether anybody uses it or not. And once again, the national government does not have that kind of power to govern such things. And frankly, even if it was true, a simple addition of a gender-neutral pronomen would be a ridiculous thing to go full moral panic over. So yeah, it's just a fairytale.
2. I have no idea what this is even about. Yes, SvT makes programmes for teenagers, both "educational" and not. Yes, some of them are about sex and relationships, because that's something teenagers tend to be extremely interested in. I can easily imagine an episode of such a show focusing on how handicapped people have sex (and like MSH said, the part about immigrants doesn't even make sense) - in fact that's a thing I'd myself be interested in hearing of. I don't see anything wrong with that or why they shouldn't. And once again, these are just on the tele like any other shows about relationships and sex. And there's a lot of those shows, you know.
3. "Some politicians" is a cheap and meaningless statement in this most likely means "a few individuals, somewhere", so of course I can't say there's nobody in the whole of Sweden advocating mandatory day-care, but it's certainly not a common sentiment and the only big party I could see even thinking of making it party policy is Vänsterpartiet, which is as the name implies the left-most party in the Riksdag, and if they actually could get a majority of their own party to support it and then somehow make it into a bill suggestion it would never survive a Riksdag vote anyway. This is just the extremist right bring outraged at people having different opinions than what themselves. "People are
proposing stuff we don't like? AHMAGAWD!!! The HORROR!" Yup, that's a sure sign of the fall of our Swedish democracy and culture, all right. People having different opinions.
I apologize again if the post seems too hostile, I get "enflamed" easily and have trouble not letting it influence my writing. It isn't meant against you or anybody in particular, so I hope you don't take offense.