My "image of Superman" is the one from the movies and various animated series like JLU.
Ohh now it makes sense. Especially since Movie Superman tends to be much weaker (Well ok he lifted an entire island and flown much faster then the speed of light) as well as often dialing back Superman for the sake of group battles or making the villain more credible.
In video media, Superman is generally presented as being powerful enough to be capable of being a strong "city-level" threat.
It is because it would be boring to see Superman fight on a planetary level...
This is presented as a credible threat to Superman. They splash around in the lava, they smash each other with multi-ton boulders, they tank terminal-velocity falls. End result: Supes is tired and injured, island is destroyed. That's the level of destruction that he and his opponents engage in
The funny thing is that Lava is considered deadly to goku until much later (sorta, he never becomes invulnerable to that heat).
Find me a non-fanmade video source that depicts Superman doing feats on the order of magnitude that would make him a credible threat for Goku. The movies and the animated shows...that's the Superman that I think most people know. Not the Superman from comics who juggles planets
So you want me to find an video of superman that quantifies how powerful he is from the show or movies?
Well of the ones you already shown me
1) Superman is able to wade through Lava. Something Goku actually cannot do.
2) In the video itself you saw the cartoon quantify how strong Superman is, which is over 100 times stronger then Goku at max. (Superman easily lifted over double what it would take to move the earth itself). Specifically 15 Octillion Megatons.
3) Superman the movie Superman manages to move so fast he is able to move the earth backwards. Much faster then the speed of light (in fact the actual speed would be unfathomable)
4) In the video itself they show a clip of a movie where Superman takes a blow the equivilant of 15 supernovas. (I saw that movie it was interesting).
5) SAME VIDEO he used his Heat vision to hack up someone's brain without shooting it through their skull.
I will find them the clips if you need them but it is going to be tough. It isn't hard to actually hear and see great feats Superman does within his own shows and movies.
Also the video, as well as me, are not counting Silverage Superman.
Though YES you will get a lot of inconsistancy even within the same show. Superman has been shown being knocked back by a Helecopter mounted gun as well as lifting impossibly heavy objects. The explanation as far as the show is concerned is that Superman is holding back and that apperantly does affect how well he can take a blow (which is because his invulnerability is tied to his will). Given that he has shrugged off attacks he had been hurt by before.
This is presented as a credible threat to Superman. They splash around in the lava, they smash each other with multi-ton boulders, they tank terminal-velocity falls. End result: Supes is tired and injured, island is destroyed. That's the level of destruction that he and his opponents engage in
Given Doomsday is as strong as superman I am not surprised he was considered a credible threat. Superman's fights just arn't as flashy as Goku's.
What is funny is the way Superman mildly inconvenienced Doomsday would have killed Goku. possibly up to SS3 and probably even then.
---
Better yet I can actually show why Goku isn't as strong as they say he is in the video. Thankfully Gotenks (who is STRONGER then SS3 Goku) manages to get hit by a Battleship and get a bruise and when going full speed manages to go slower then the speed of light.
---
Mind you the worst Death Battle in terms of "That isn't how it works" is Link versus Cloud. Where the results would have been quite the opposite (That battle suffers from what I call "Captain America's shield Syndrome" in the worst way. With Link even managing the split second timing required to stop the Omnislash, which even for him it would have been impossible.). I mean say what you will about Goku versus Superman they at least shown their work giving both comicbook and TV show examples of his outright numbers and did the same for Goku, even if I disagreed with them I could at least admit that they made a valid case.
The absolute worst in terms of "No Duh" was Thor versus Raiden... To the point where I think they should have chosen a closer match. Raiden may be a god of thunder but the Mortal Kombat series has tended to be rather down to earth (Ignoring that Raiden once created a super nuclear explosion).
All in all the series is pretty bad so far... the only ones I liked was Batman versus Spiderman and Goku Versus Superman... The rest were either a big no duh or... that Cloud Versus Link.
Predictions:
-I am now on Peach Versus Zelda and let me already put my vote in... ZELDA! I mean if they included her Super Princess Peach Powers... MAYBE there is something in there... but no Zelda wins!
-Eggman Versus Wily: Oooh... Ok I'll give it to them. I don't know. Eggman has created world destroying machines and Wily has made Zero a robot with the ability to cancel ANY opponents power to zero (which only Megaman X is somewhat immune to... Megaman X's power that he has infinite potential).
-Master Chief Versus Doomguy: Master Chief. If they read any of the material they would know that they REALLY exagerate the power of Master Chief.
-Chun-Li Versus Mai: I think Chun-Li, I don't know much about Mai but Chun-Li does have super speed, strength, and Chi generation. If they know that.
Ugh... these are all going to suck...
Result: Peach Versus Zelda: No, I think you guys are over valuing "being unpredictable". This one is pretty bad... not as bad as Cloud Versus Link but still pretty bad. Even worse is they made the clincher her kick... when she was shot with the Arrow of Light.
Result: Wily Versus Eggman: Oook... so No Zero... Odd. This is a weird battle So many of their best machines on both sides were excluded. As well they forgot Mummyman is neigh immortal.
----
Ok I watched enough I finally understand what their Bias is.
They tend to over value specific abilities. For example in Spiderman Versus Batman they overvalued Spiderman's Spidersense forgetting that Spiderman can be surprised since his Spider sense isn't perfect. The fight went the way it should have but that was the first sign.
The second was in Link versus Cloud where they over valued Link's ability to use his shield. Giving Cloud no ability to strike around it even though... he could have easily much faster then link.
The Third was Starscream Versus Rainbow Dash where they overvalued her speed and turned it into "Unhittable" (though in their words it is because he has bad aim). Even though her regular flight speed is much slower then Starscream's bullets.
In otherwords they tend to over value "Dodge" and "Shield" abilities (Except in that Zelda versus Peach fight, I don't know what happened there) as well as any "Perfect" ability. Which the issue is that with many of these battles these shields are far more likely to fall then the opponent's attack itself.
Their second Bias is an odd one because I never seen it before, because everyone knows it makes no sense, is what I shall call the "Variety Bias" where they will often declair winners based simply around the variety of attacks or disconnect between the attacks rather then the outright quality. Which is so ludicrous that it is often like saying someone would win a shoot out because they brought five different guns to kill one guy. The two fights this occurs in is both the Mai versus Chun-Li and Princess Peach versus Zelda where this was considered the deciding factor. In fact even Link versus Cloud had that where many of Link's attacks would have been outright useless against cloud such as Link's boomerang and even his Bombs yet were considered an advantage. An issue where Link's arsenal would have been negated by Link's outright abilities was never brought up.
The issue with these is that, as we know, the quality of a single simple attack can overcome an arsenal of a million unpredictable ones if that single attack is just outright better. Thus fighters who have a more simple yet more finely tuned arsenal tend to get undervalued to someone who is much less capable but more with more variety of attacks.
I feel like I wasted my time. I started to even be able to predict it... Wonderwoman versus Rogue for example I knew Wonderwoman would win in an actual fight, however because I know how they would overvalue Rogue's ability I know they would make her the winner.