You could at least attempt to be constructive and try to understand what I said. If you'd read the rest of my posts instead of that one quote out-of-context, you'd know exactly what I mean. I'm not going to bother repeating myself to someone who can't bother to read it the first time.
I did actually scan from page 30 (4 days ago) to see if I was missing some context. If you've posted in this thread prior to the one I quoted, it was over 13 pages ago. What are you on about?
Well for starters you can stop assuming that rape is something that's only done by big heug muscle barbarians and not by lonely angry nerds with big issues with malformed ideas of 'informed consent' and 'social contexts'.
You don't get some kind of medal because you managed to go one day without sticking your dick in someone who didn't want it, you know.
I wasn't, I didn't say that, and nobody gives me medals for anything.
While I wouldn't phrase it like that, you'd be surprised how many people don't understand consent. Most of the people I'm around at college consider it morally acceptable to get someone extremely drunk or otherwise inebriated in order to have sex with them. My roommate, for example.
Though he hasn't actually done that, to my knowledge, and in fact has attempted to regale me with tales of his "chivalry" in not sleeping with drunk girls after he found out I consider that to be rape. That brings up another topic, the "Award for Basic Human Decency" issue.
While I've never gotten anyone inebriated with the intention of taking advantage of them, I've maybe had sex sober twice in my entire life. Does that mean I've been serial raped? Have I been raping my sexual partners while they've been raping me?
Sorry, I am basically playing devil's advocate here, but I'd be lying if I said that the vast majority of my sexual experiences didn't involve all parties concerned being in some state of intoxication.