IronyOwl:
@Those questions: Yes I was assuming you sent the bear at Jim, hence me targeting the bear which would explain why I suspected you when you said that.
TolyK claims he targeted me.
If this is true, he actually targeted my bear.
> THEREFORE, if TolyK is correct he was viewing my bear.
TolyK claimed he viewed his target visiting Jim.
My bear cannot visit Jim.
> THEREFORE, TolyK did not observe my bear.
ALSO THEREFORE, TolyK did not observe me.
You, for some reason, went with the slightly more blatantly retarded version of:
TolyK claims he targeted IronyOwl.
IronyOwl claims Tolyk would have seen his bear instead.
> THEREFORE, IronyOwl has an actioning bear he didn't tell us about.
I was assuming that sending a bear and being tracked/watched/however you call TolyK's action had a nametag on it as he said it was distinctly, IronyOwl. It would be funny to track you and come up with a result of 'Tibbers', hence why I asked you the questions before that.
IF TolyK did
not observe you, then why did he outline your name? Why can't your bear not visit Jim?
And perhaps I
am being retarded, but any lead is a lead. Maybe I should've said earlier on that tangent and yes, it does look stupid now that my head is clear of being busy IRL but choosing to pressure you ends up in a talk about your teddy bear.
So you did not send Tibbers, at all, to anyone? [Missed that question btw.]
PPE:
TolyK.
...
Never actually told? You just said
IronyOwl! So how did you end up knowing that target right there in italic and bold?