Sorry I didn’t realize you asked a question Jim [May I call you Jim?] Well let’s get the embarrassing part out of the way.
The first two points are now totally irrelevant. He has answered the switch in opinion to my satisfaction. Should I elaborate on that a bit more or not?
[IC's + Tiruin: If I stay in the game my participation is going to drop to probably like 0.85 high-quality posts per day due to the aforementioned IRL ass-biting. What would you prefer, that I RR like I currently am and bow out, or that I stick around with a significantly reduced level of participation?]
@vodot, you thought the possibility that we may think you prefer Jim off the game because you are scum and he is townie?
Yep. If he and I were even remotely evenly skilled, that's exactly what i'd do if I were scum. As it stands, don't be foolish: given the gap in our skill levels, regardless of how hard I tried to cloak my Jimbotting [can I use that as a verb?] he would just eat me and move on.
I think I feel so safe going after Jim because I know that he can spot my true alignment, right now, from ten miles away. So if he's scum, we newbs had better start preparing for an epic battle against him or Shake. And if he's town, I have no real need to be concerned about him retaliating or eating me; he almost certainly knows my alignment already.
I'm not dismissing your concern. I think it's valid. I just know it is ultimately unmerited.
Seems like a stupid question, I know, but seeing he is an IC, if townie, it could help us better, I think.
See, this is the dangerous line of thinking I'm talking about. Jim will still IC this game even if he's dead: there is no reason to fear lynching him
based on his IC-ness and reputation alone. Don't get complacent.
[/quote]
First off what is Jimbotting? Is that a phrase?
The reason I find this suspicious is that he’s going after you for no reason other than that he figures you’d be a powerful enemy. Why is he so worried about you when you’ve shown no scum-tells? I’m suspicious of you too but that’s because you haven’t proven you’re town yet. It appears, here, that he’s saying “Jim would be powerful as scum. Let’s lynch him just in case.” It just strikes me as scummy.
-Snip-
@Everyone else who think's I'm scum damn stupid enough to lynch the ICs in broad daylight on D1 without having or citing any evidence against them at all:
Maybe this will help clarify my mindset: I came in fully expecting that an IC could roll scum. If that happened, I expected that IC (like any good mafia) to at some point give some poor sucker misleading information during the game, use that misinformation to their advantage to win, and then use the whole situation as an educational talking point in the dead/after-game chat.
How can that not be a possibility, given that the ICs are ostensibly also trying to win? If I'm wrong, I'm wrong, ok— maybe that isn't allowed, or something— but I do not want to be that sucker. If they are scum, they will try to lie convincingly to us at some point. How can I not desire to guard myself, at least, from buying that lie? This is why I really like Shake's use of brackets so that I can tell the difference between gameplay and advice; and it's probably part of the reason why I'm still *feeling* a little more touchy around Jim.
All, please pay attention to who is going after me for this. I'm playing an aggressive game with the IC's, but I'm playing an equally aggressive game with everyone else, too. This "lynch the IC's!!" strawman they're putting up is pretty serious and it is a great point of attack. They are going to go after me for it to try and get me out of the game without having to spend an NK on me.
TL;DR: I prefer direct solutions. I'd just NK Jim if I were scum and afraid of him, and don't WIFOM me here. That is what I would do, and it's how I answered your first question on day one, Kamin.
He gets very upset that people are worried with his logic. Very angry. I’m lead to believe that outbursts of anger when challenged is a scum-tell. Even if it’s not he says that the IC’s have to be scum or at the very least one of them. He also seems to think that the IC’s would be able to get away with giving faulty gameplay related information. Maybe I read it wrong, but if that’s the case then he’s either A) Not thinking or B) Hoping we are not. I’m pretty sure the fine folks who run this board-set wouldn’t let people who take advantage of new players to IC in a BM. If that makes sense ya know?