Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 461 462 [463] 464 465 ... 648

Author Topic: The small random questions thread [WAAAAAAAAAAluigi]  (Read 892366 times)

King Zultan

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The small random questions thread [WAAAAAAAAAAluigi]
« Reply #6930 on: February 04, 2021, 03:28:26 am »

Probably could fill in the missing parts with elephant DNA to make something that looks very much like a mammoth if/when we have the technology to.
Or use frog DNA so you only have to make one 8)
But what happens when life finds a way?
Logged
The Lawyer opens a briefcase. It's full of lemons, the justice fruit only lawyers may touch.
Make sure not to step on any errant blood stains before we find our LIFE EXTINGUSHER.
but anyway, if you'll excuse me, I need to commit sebbaku.
Quote from: Leodanny
Can I have the sword when you’re done?

wierd

  • Bay Watcher
  • I like to eat small children.
    • View Profile
Re: The small random questions thread [WAAAAAAAAAAluigi]
« Reply #6931 on: February 04, 2021, 03:32:37 am »

Pig and elephant DNA just wont splice.
Logged

scriver

  • Bay Watcher
  • City streets ain't got much pity
    • View Profile
Re: The small random questions thread [WAAAAAAAAAAluigi]
« Reply #6932 on: February 04, 2021, 09:34:04 am »

There's no reason why it shouldn't. They both have snouts. They both have tusks. They both have funny looking tails. I don't think there are any other conditions relevant to DNA splicing
Logged
Love, scriver~

delphonso

  • Bay Watcher
  • menaces with spikes of pine
    • View Profile
Re: The small random questions thread [WAAAAAAAAAAluigi]
« Reply #6933 on: February 04, 2021, 10:37:04 am »

Finally, catdog can live.

McTraveller

  • Bay Watcher
  • This text isn't very personal.
    • View Profile
Re: The small random questions thread [WAAAAAAAAAAluigi]
« Reply #6934 on: February 04, 2021, 12:06:03 pm »

I could've sworn I asked this question already, but can't find it with the forum search...nor in the first 3 pages of my post history... so:

For the meteorologists out there - can you explain what is means for a forecast to say '99% chance of snow; 3" '?  I can understand 99% chance of snow, but the specific 3" number with it throws me.  Is the 3" the expected value of snow for 99% of the area?  Is it a 99% chance of 3", and 1% of some other amount?

I know there are rules about how precipitation is reported, but it just makes no sense to me.  Especially since this time of year I know it means 100% chance of snow, anywhere from trace-6" (even though the weather advisory says 1-4").
Logged
This product contains deoxyribonucleic acid which is known to the State of California to cause cancer, reproductive harm, and other health issues.

MrRoboto75

  • Bay Watcher
  • Belongs in the Trash!
    • View Profile
Re: The small random questions thread [WAAAAAAAAAAluigi]
« Reply #6935 on: February 04, 2021, 12:10:04 pm »

I think three inches is the expected average of snowfall over the area that will experience snow.
Logged
I consume
I purchase
I consume again

dragdeler

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The small random questions thread [WAAAAAAAAAAluigi]
« Reply #6936 on: February 04, 2021, 12:56:05 pm »

-
« Last Edit: September 16, 2023, 01:35:46 pm by dragdeler »
Logged
let

MrRoboto75

  • Bay Watcher
  • Belongs in the Trash!
    • View Profile
Re: The small random questions thread [WAAAAAAAAAAluigi]
« Reply #6937 on: February 04, 2021, 03:01:30 pm »

Density is mass in relation to volume.
Logged
I consume
I purchase
I consume again

methylatedspirit

  • Bay Watcher
  • it/its
    • View Profile
Re: The small random questions thread [WAAAAAAAAAAluigi]
« Reply #6938 on: February 05, 2021, 02:40:03 am »

I read this on the Oldskool PC (it's a guide to running 80s/early-90s games on late-90s hardware; just use DOSbox for modern hardware):
Quote
Most internal BIOS setup programs can be invoked by hitting a key while the machine is still booting up. The most common keystroke that comes to mind is hitting DEL while the memory is counting upward; this is commonly found on AMI BIOSes. Other keystrokes that come to mind include CTRL-ALT-ENTER (modern Dell Pentium Pros/Pentium IIs), CTRL-ALT-S (old Dell 386s), CTRL-ALT-ESC (old Phoenix 386 BIOSes), and simply ESC. If these don't work, just read your screen--many display a line like "Hit <DEL> to enter setup" or something similar, with the keystroke displayed.

What? When did the BIOS setup key combo switch from variations on Esc, Alt, Ctrl to the "industry-standard" (as standardized as it can be, anyway) function keys, usually F1, F2, or F3? Why?
Logged

wierd

  • Bay Watcher
  • I like to eat small children.
    • View Profile
Re: The small random questions thread [WAAAAAAAAAAluigi]
« Reply #6939 on: February 05, 2021, 03:04:17 am »

"F1 to resume" has been a thing since the IBM 5150.

Phoenix Bios did things differently, BECAUSE there had been a massive legal battle over it, since it was a clean-room reverse engineering job of the IBM PC's BIOS firmware implementation, and it needed to do some things different to avoid appearing as a straight up carbon copy.






If memory serves, that is (301) keyboard error, and (601) floppy disk controller error.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 03:13:42 am by wierd »
Logged

methylatedspirit

  • Bay Watcher
  • it/its
    • View Profile
Re: The small random questions thread [WAAAAAAAAAAluigi]
« Reply #6940 on: February 05, 2021, 04:25:33 am »

Huh. No actual error messages, just halt and print a number? I suppose they just ran out of ROM to fit the error messages in? I think this happens with the ZX80 and ZX81 as well, but at least those had an excuse: they were made to be as inexpensive as possible. Seems strange that a machine starting at $1565 would share something in common with a machine an order of magnitude cheaper than itself.
Logged

wierd

  • Bay Watcher
  • I like to eat small children.
    • View Profile
Re: The small random questions thread [WAAAAAAAAAAluigi]
« Reply #6941 on: February 05, 2021, 04:48:24 am »

quite early in the "AT" product line, IBM only implemented the NVRAM and check routines, and not the setup program itself in ROM.

This was because floppies were significantly cheaper than ROM, and the program could be more easily updated and more feature-rich (ahem) in software loaded from DOS.

Since by then, the AT Clones had started hitting the market, (Compaq portable and portable II, for instance), that meant lots of proprietary bits of software to set the CMOS data.

A common bit of kit back in the day was "Generic AT Setup", which is exactly what it says it is.  It is a full text mode GUI CMOS utility, that you run from the command line, that is aware of IBM RTC/CMOS chips, and can set them.

http://www.minuszerodegrees.net/5170/setup/5170_gsetup.htm
« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 04:51:53 am by wierd »
Logged

dragdeler

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The small random questions thread [WAAAAAAAAAAluigi]
« Reply #6942 on: February 05, 2021, 07:54:45 am »

-
« Last Edit: September 16, 2023, 01:35:10 pm by dragdeler »
Logged
let

methylatedspirit

  • Bay Watcher
  • it/its
    • View Profile
Re: The small random questions thread [WAAAAAAAAAAluigi]
« Reply #6943 on: February 05, 2021, 08:26:57 am »

quite early in the "AT" product line, IBM only implemented the NVRAM and check routines, and not the setup program itself in ROM.

This was because floppies were significantly cheaper than ROM, and the program could be more easily updated and more feature-rich (ahem) in software loaded from DOS.

So I've heard. It still sounds utterly dumb; if the floppy gets corrupted, you're basically boned. According to that article I linked, "Some brand-name "value-added" PCs, like Compaq and AST, required or may still require a special setup disk instead of hitting a key", so some manufacturers may have been pulling this up to '98.

I suppose the modern equivalent (a bootable USB stick to run BIOS setup) would make a bit more sense, but this was pre-Internet. You couldn't just download a fresh copy of the BIOS setup disk off the 'net and write one yourself, not in the late 80s.

But hindsight's 20/20. No-one intended these things to be used even a decade later, so what we'd see as awfully short-sighted now was just an engineering decision made with and by the limitations of the time. Maybe in another 40 years, people would've moved onto ARM or RISC-V for everything, and they'd laugh at us for using x86, and at those legacy systems that still use x86, just like we laugh at the mainframes that still run parts of the US government.
Logged

dragdeler

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The small random questions thread [WAAAAAAAAAAluigi]
« Reply #6944 on: February 05, 2021, 11:03:15 am »

-
« Last Edit: September 16, 2023, 01:34:58 pm by dragdeler »
Logged
let
Pages: 1 ... 461 462 [463] 464 465 ... 648