I do want to point out the time frame, back then women DID NEED it, just like back then kings provided protection to those he ?”ruled” over or should I say server (if they followed the bible)Women are not weak no, but when it comes down to it a man can get stronger, will be stronger, and women cant stop them, more so back then when strength was all power was
So I’d say God did this to protect them from those who did not follow Gods world, I mean women where treated badly, both form Christians and non Christians but if Christians had followed the bible then they would not have been as badly.
the women would have been respected and watched over
Huh, is that not what we do now?
We tell women not to walk down dark alleys alone, we tell them travel in groups, we tell them many things to “protect” these women you claim don’t need it, we have all sort of things set up for them to protect them, things that give them more rights, rights that men don’t have
Seems to me we still are doing it but in different way to reflect the times, no more dose a man need to fight off the raiders attacking the girl (thank God) we now focus on other things as well but we still watch them, its why we have excite health care for them, special insurance and other breaks
[citation_needed]
Seems to me you need to, find one example of him talking down to a women, OTHER then calling one a "dog". Before you say it, it was not a term for bitch, it was a term on her people, not gender, and it was a test to see her response.
Take your pick, then. There is, of course, no shortage of injustice.
]Or perhaps we should stay on topic and look at misogyny. Then again, why be so specific when we can just look at all of the intolerance? //skepticsannotatedbible.com/cruelty/long.html]But nothing gets quite so flat out crazy as the violence.
How’d I guess you were going to do that? Oh yeah only about a million others who never read the bible have used the same thing. How about reading the bible? or at least LOOKING for an example instead of seeing a guy point out all the "flaws" did you even look at the whole site? Did you read the fact he has a page that has answers to ALL of those “problems” many multiple times over.
Here is one of the links form his page.
http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/christian.htmlyou did not look did you? you just said "okay there are flaws here, no need to check them"
So now I ask you READ these, can I answer every single one? nope, but I could ask same questions about ANYTHING its easy to find "problems" with anythin
here is one example out of the bat that you guys LOVE to use (form this very site, its used so much I have it freaking benched marked
http://www.lookinguntojesus.net/answering.htmonce again another one set up for it, but you did not bother to look you just posted that it take it as proof, you wont read these, you will deny them, and still use your link as proof and nothing will chnage
And don't go all "Old v. New Testament" on me. If you want just the New Testament examples, you need but scroll down.
funny if you did the same you would see the "
Christian answers" link and looking around you will see ALL of them have been answered in one way or another.