Right, so, name problems that couldn't be fixed by African governments or prevented in the first place caused by the EU and America.
Have you ever heard of slavery or colonialism? Do you understand why those would badly screw up the development of countries, or do I need to create a picturebook to explain?
You do realize that slavery was very much endemic in Africa and that their political structures were godawful even before colonialism, right? No centralization, no professional bureaucracies... They were screwed either way.
Not advocating colonialism or slavery here, btw; just saying that blaming Africa's problems exclusively on these influences is problematic to say the least. Empirical evidence: Abyssinia/Ethiopia has had practically no colonial history apart from a misguided Italian adventure in the thirties, and South Africa was very much colonized but is now approaching the life standard of the poorer European countries.
And another interesting tidbit: The amount of aid Africa has received since decolonialization is five times the amount Europe received under the Marshall Plan after having been blown to smithereens for the second time in fifty years. 'Bloodmoney', so to speak, has been paid quite liberally.
He's playing the difficult game of trying to appease his party, who are predominantly Eurosceptic, thereby preventing them from fleeing to UKIP, but he also wants to appeal to the moderates who may be more inclined to vote Labour in light of the European issues. Unfortunately he isn't a very effective politician and isn't doing as well as he'd like to be in this particular struggle.
Sounds like you need a British Merkel - she basically does what she wants, says nothing, and lets her party take the fire when stuff goes wrong. The opposition, meanwhile, is bleeding out, and Merkel's approval ratings are through the roof.
Regardless of political matters, it has to be admitted that she's a very capable politician.