Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: Controlling your fortress entrance in .09  (Read 8003 times)

Niccolo

  • Bay Watcher
  • [PREFSTRING:Sweet top hat]
    • View Profile
Re: Controlling your fortress entrance in .09
« Reply #30 on: May 20, 2012, 07:10:58 am »

Sure, once you get the setup right, it's child's play to sit there and watch it go off, but designing it isn't exactly something that's so simple that you'll do it right your first (or even tenth) try.

xD First time I tried a drowning trap, I forgot that all of that water has to go somewhere.
Logged
What's wrong with using magma? That's almost always the easiest method.
I have issues channeling it properly to do that method. I end up flooding the fortress with magma.
Check out my RtD!

Castamere

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Controlling your fortress entrance in .09
« Reply #31 on: May 20, 2012, 07:36:39 am »

Easily: ;)

I build two Trade depos: one outside of the fort, one inside
The one outside is surrounded by drawbridges so that they are airtight when risen.
Also two entrances: the first main one is trapfree, 3 squares wide
the second one is full of traps, one tile wide cage traps/dodge me/whatever, kitten directly above the entrance for thief detection

No caravan: The trapfree entrance is closed and the trap one is opened for sieges/thieves, bridges around the outside Trade depo are lowered
Caravan comes: I wait for the wagons to come on the map, they go for the outside depo. I open the trapfree entrance. Next I raise the bridges that are around the ouside Depo to cut off their pathing to it. Merchants now dash for the Trade depo that's inside the fort

In my opinion the simplest design, you control the situation completely. There also aren't any thief building destroyers and you can rise the depo bridges in case of a siege.
Logged
Playing DF is like getting into an elevator where you know it will freefall forty stories after it climbs about two.

Jake

  • Bay Watcher
  • Remember Boatmurdered!
    • View Profile
    • My Web Fiction
Re: Controlling your fortress entrance in .09
« Reply #32 on: May 20, 2012, 07:50:32 am »

I set the trade depot up in a large walled-in courtyard with high battlements, and if an ambush turns up I simply close the gates (metal wall grates for a portcullis and some floodgates rather than a drawbridge), station marksdwarves on the walls and let them go to town on the goblins with relative impunity. The traps inside the main entrance are just insurance.
Logged
Never used Dwarf Therapist, mods or tilesets in all the years I've been playing.
I think Toady's confusing interface better simulates the experience of a bunch of disorganised drunken dwarves running a fort.

Black Powder Firearms - Superior firepower, realistic manufacturing and rocket launchers!

Asra

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Controlling your fortress entrance in .09
« Reply #33 on: May 20, 2012, 08:39:53 am »

Hmm this has gotten me thinking. Since invaders go to the dining room, what would happen if I had the dining room outside of the fort and restricted so the dwarfs wouldn't go there, or is that impossible? Seems like something that can be amusingly used to trick goblins into going into a secondary, completely trap-filled fort.


As for my fort, I usually go with a drawbridge surrounded by cage traps. Never actually considered putting my trade depot inside most of the time, since I don't really care much about the traders themselves. Most of my fortresses have had a castle design with walls and fortifications over the main gate too, though ones build into a mountain usually go for a few different areas full of traps blocked off by bridges and doors.

 
Logged

Kaos

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Controlling your fortress entrance in .09
« Reply #34 on: July 26, 2012, 08:34:56 pm »

I'm trying a system where the entrance has a series of pressure plates that divert creatures by type, basically like this:
* 1st plate set to creature only, opens a hatch and a door, next
* 2nd plate set to creatures and citizens, again opens a hatch and a door
the idea was that the first plate would filter out goblins, wild animals, necros, etc... all the hostiles that trigger a pressure plate, when they step on it the main path will close by opening the hatch and a new path will open through the door
only my own citizens, kobolds and other trap avoid creatures, and small wild animals woudn't trigger this plate
the next plate would get triggered by my own citizens and a new path through the door will open while the kobold path will be closed by opening the hatch...
both the goblin path and the kobold path go through 4 1x10 retracting bridges, one after the other, to ensure that even if I get the fastest enemy they won't be able to cross the 40 tiles before the bridge opens and drops them to a containment chamber 1 z-level bellow.
the point of the containment chamber is to catch all the enemies in the siege/ambush, once they enter my fort they won't be leaving, if I start killing or hurting them the others usually flee, no going back this way, as long as their friends are alive they'll keep trying to enter until I get them all... buahaha... ehem..
in the case of the goblin path the same pressure plate also triggers the 4 bridges, I was expecting that they would step on the plate, open the hatch closing the original path, also open the door and immediately re-path through the bridge corridor...
it didn't work like that, the goblin ambush I got to play with, would step on the pressure plate open the hatch and the door and instead of immediately re-pathing through the door, they would stand there like idiots so long that the bridges would retract while they still were on the plate or just stepping through the door...
Is there any documentation about how long it takes for creatures to re-path?
I read in the wiki about how many tics it takes for them to move and concluded that the fastest creatures could move 1 tile every 5 tics and the slowest 1 tile every 16 tics, that's how I came up with the 4 bridges distance to avoid any fast creatures to go through the bridges before the 100 tic delay for it to open kicks in...
Next test I did was getting rid of the door, this way they would step on the plate and only break the shorter path through the hatch, since the other path was already there they didn't seem to take extra time recalculating paths with the new path through the door since there was no door now, they would correctly attempt to cross the bridges only to fall to the containment chamber...
The problem I got with this attempt was that after the ambush leader felt and was trapped in the containment chamber the other goblins that haven't jet made it through the bridge would get stuck in place, I only got them to move when I unforbid the hatch that allows entry to the containment chamber, so basically if the other ambusher don't have a valid path to their leader they won't move, it's the same behaviour when the leader gets caged...
To detect and contain trap avoids like kobolds, I have another corridor with bridges, at the middle of the corridor on the z-level above I have an adult pig pastured on a floor grate, behind the grate there is a pressure plate that triggers the bridges, the idea is that when the kobold reaches the middle of the 4 bridge corridor, it gets spotted and revealed by the pig, that runs away from the pasture and steps on the plate, it can't leave the spotting room because it's locked by a pet impassable door, since there are 20 full tiles in both directions the kobold can not be fast enough to reach out of the bridges in any direction so it falls to the containment chamber when the bridges retract triggered by the pressure plate in the pig's spotting room.
By the way it has to be a pig or any other creature big enough to trigger a plate and that is not aggressive, I tried with dogs but instead of running away dogs attack the target so they stay on the grate trying to attack the kobold bellow, I think the pig can be automatized and auto-resets by also making the zone on top of the grate a meeting area and forbidding the door completely so dwarves don't go there, so the pig gets scared steps on the plate, drops the kobold, then the pigs goes back to the meeting zone and the bridge resets since the plate is no longer being stepped on.
I tried the dog and pig and the pig does spots the kobold and triggers the plate, the dog not quite because of the above mentioned. Haven't really tested well the meeting area auto-reset, also need to further test the system to see if any kobold makes it out in the 20 tiles...
Now going back to the re-pathing problems, I also saw this with my own dwarves on the 2nd plate, the idea was to let my dwarves go outside to chop trees and gather plants and when they would enter they could not be followed in by enemies, the problem is if the are bringing in a chopped log and they step on the plate that breaks the path by opening the hatch and offer a new path by opening the door, they get a path blocked cancel and drop the log there on the plate, in the other hand if they are going out to pick up an item and the path changes the simply re-path (or maybe is it that the drop that job and get another one??)
Of course there is also the problem that by having dwarves going in and out through the same only entry/exit they would spot the kobolds or ambushes before the enemies were able to get to 1st plate breaking the whole purpose...
To fix this I'm testing another system that minimizes who goes in and out the fortress, and avoids carrying stuff through the filtering corridors, basically is a drop chute using minecarts, the wood hauler would get the log and go bellow ground through a stair to drop the log on a wood stockpile, this is linked to a minecart that drops the wood through a chute and bellow it is dropped by plate to the final quantum stockpile that will get used by the carpenter or whatever. The hauler and woodcutter could stay permanently outside having a living area near the drop chute protected by a plate that if a goblin tries to chase them it would open a hatch in front of them.
I was thinking maybe a system where the original path doesn't change like my test without the door, or maybe if I open the door before I open the hatch they have time to re-path? and of course the leader problem... maybe some sort of device that allows for enemies of different speeds to catch up and enter the bridge corridor as a group...?
« Last Edit: July 26, 2012, 08:36:50 pm by Kaos »
Logged

loose nut

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Controlling your fortress entrance in .09
« Reply #35 on: July 26, 2012, 08:54:23 pm »

The old dodge-trap gate defense involved a 1-tile-wide row of dodge traps over a pit, and when you wanted depot access, you had two 1-tile-wide bridges on either side of the row of traps.

The 0.34.09 variant has a 1-tile-wide row of dodge traps over a pit, and a 3-tile-wide bridge next to it, which you extend when you want depot access. This works pretty well (though in the fort where I have this implemented, I have a row of dodge traps on either side of the bridge).
Logged

Sutremaine

  • Bay Watcher
  • [ETHIC:ATROCITY: PERSONAL_MATTER]
    • View Profile
Re: Controlling your fortress entrance in .09
« Reply #36 on: July 26, 2012, 09:43:06 pm »

It would take quite a bit of space and traps depending on how you do it, but you could simply make a winding path for the wagon that goes through/around the traps:

Minimal traps, high trigger rate:
Code: [Select]
####   ####
#         #
#         #
#   ^^^   #
#         #
#         #
####   ####
#         #
#         #
#   ^^^   #
#         #
#         #
####   ####
There's a rather large gap between individual traps, but enemies will barge straight through them. Serrated discs would probably work well here -- they're pretty good at making opponents bleed to death from massive damage, and the large gaps between traps allow time for this instead of insta-gibbing enemies on the spot and possibly jamming the trap.
Logged
I am trying to make chickens lay bees as eggs. So far it only produces a single "Tame Small Creature" when a hen lays bees.
Honestly at the time, I didn't see what could go wrong with crowding 80 military Dwarves into a small room with a necromancer for the purpose of making bacon.

Gentlefish

  • Bay Watcher
  • [PREFSTRING: balloon-like qualities]
    • View Profile
Re: Controlling your fortress entrance in .09
« Reply #37 on: July 26, 2012, 09:55:58 pm »

Well. I just had a great idea. It'd work sort of like a stone fall trap.
You have your usual one tile wide dodge trap, and above it you have a floor along it, connected to supports (wagons can traverse supports, right?) And as soon as the lead goblin makes it through, a pressure plate would deconstruct the supports, dropping the floor along the whole bridge. Those that survive the drop would dodge into the pit, and those that don't would be crushed by the deconstructed floor. And you'd have the retractable bridges for the wagons. And for easy building of the floors, you would have retractable bridges above connected to the wall-floors above.

Kaos

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Controlling your fortress entrance in .09
« Reply #38 on: July 27, 2012, 12:03:54 am »

how damaging is a standard dodge-me trap using feather wood spiked balls? My point is to make them dodge unharmed only 1 z-level down to contain, not kill them (at least not until I get them all), again the problem would be if the leader dodges and gets contained any goblin that hasn't reached the dodge-me  tap yet will just stay put like it happened with my retracting bridges.. some sort of group clustering device is needed... or some way to single out the leader and release it back to the beginning of the trap so the others are able to move...
« Last Edit: July 27, 2012, 12:05:49 am by Kaos »
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]