Since the Democrats don't have a prayer of keeping the senate or gaining the house, everyone should vote for Romney because we can all agree, getting SOMETHING done is better than getting NOTHING done.
The elections are far from decided, sir. Beyond that, I would rather crawl forward than run backward.
You're right, let's keep taking out a credit card from the Bank of China in the name of our kids, driving up our national debt. That's irresponsible. It's unpatriotic.
It was certainly good enough for the GOP from 2000-2008.
And no, doing SOMETHING is not always better than doing nothing. There are lots of somethings that would be worse, in fact. Wasn't that the argument in 2010 as to why the "Democratic trifecta" had to be stopped? "OMG Obama can pass anything he wants, we're all gonna be forced to marry gay Muslim communists and pay 90% taxes to fund a national pornography fund!!!"
The Affordable Healthcare Act was doing *something* instead of nothing. And yet to hear the reaction to its passage, you'd think he'd just sacrificed a baker's dozen of newborns to the Dark Lord Ba'al on the White House front lawn.
In short, he had two years to do a lot of somethings. And he did. And the GOP gnashed its teeth and wailed and played the scare game like a boss and it got them the House. And then after the 2010 elections, "doing nothing" became the
modus operandi. And now you want to twist the narrative of Republican-induced inaction (to "put the brakes on the Democratic dictatorship") into Obama-induced inaction and make a Republican trifecta on power seem like a good thing??!? Shameless. Absolutely shameless.