Alexander Kiselev is a credit to the world of science. I salute his goal and wish him luck - he probably has a bright future.
Andrew Hsu pisses me off with every moment of his existence. Nobody should be that intelligent and driven.
Ben Yu will do the human race a tremendous favor by devoting his boundless energy to making it slightly more efficient to compare prices on used copies of World War Z between Amazon and eBay.
Christopher Rueth is about one-fifth of LulzSec.
Dale Stephens will revolutionize employment with a job-search system for people who refuse to go to school.
Daniel Friedman, Paul Gu, and Eric McKay are cheaters for winning as a group, and their plan either sounds like it'll keep me from getting a job longer or blow up the financial investment market again.
Darren Zhu is a proper scientist, who once again, makes me hate all life and mine in particular for not being born with a PhD.
David (Jiageng) Luan is a great guy, 'cause he's gonna build the Sex Bots.
Eden Full will be a witness in a war-crimes trial in a few years, after she tries to resolve the African energy market.
Faheem Zaman plan for "mobile financial services" is all Greek to me, but sounds like his heart's in the right place.
Gary Kurek is what entrepreneur success stories are supposed to sound like.
James Proud has a posse.
Jeffrey Lim thinks the world needs moar Facebook.
John Burnham will doom us all when the meteor redirection rocket-harness fails.
Laura Deming is already tapped for agency with The Majestic Twelve.
Jim Danielson cannot get his stuff on the road fast enough.
John Marbach is going to get blown out of the water by everything in the world that already uses YouTube.
Nick Cammarata and David Merfield are more cheaters who will earn my respect if and only if they come up with a better web system than Blackboard.
Sujay Tyle will bring about the Gray Goo.
Tom Currier has no idea how hard the energy industry pound him into the dirt.
Sebastien Zany had better make damn sure he hits the power plug as soon as the computers start asking him about love and war.
I can't tell if it's sarcasm or just optimism in some of those descriptions. Quite honestly, a lot of them sound an awful lot like the joke from this week's Prairie Home Companion:
http://prairiehome.publicradio.org/programs/2011/06/25/scripts/english.shtmlThat last guy especially. Too much meaningless babble in that sentence and no actual substance.
is pursuing a program to unify computation in a cohesive and elegant framework based around Haskell, with the goal of finally realizing the potential of computers and the Internet to enable people to work with information fluidly and creatively, especially on mobile devices.
is pursuing a program: best I can decypher, that means he's designing it or something
to unify computation in a cohesive and elegant framework: so he's putting something together to make it pretty
based around Haskell: written in the programming language Haskell
with the goal of finally realizing the potential of computers and the Internet to enable people: to let people
to work with information fluidly and creatively: graphs, ho!
especially on mobile devices: and whatever he is making, it has to run on crappy mobile cpus
Or to sum it all up:
He is doing mobile development with Haskell to make pretty graphs with internet data.
See, why can't they ever be succinct and understandable in their descriptions. >_<