Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Poll

Highest Irrelevant American Third-Party Result (Major Party Results Will Be Bullied)

Socialist
- 17 (33.3%)
Green
- 8 (15.7%)
Peace and Freedom
- 2 (3.9%)
Democratic
- 1 (2%)
Transhumanist
- 11 (21.6%)
Libertarian
- 8 (15.7%)
Republican
- 2 (3.9%)
Constitution
- 2 (3.9%)

Total Members Voted: 50


Pages: 1 ... 206 207 [208] 209 210 ... 375

Author Topic: Shit, let's be Off-Compass Meme Poll Meme  (Read 485476 times)

scrdest

  • Bay Watcher
  • Girlcat?/o_ o
    • View Profile
Re: Shit, let's be FEET
« Reply #3105 on: June 15, 2014, 05:08:14 pm »

The thing is, a ton of the questions are really stereotypical and discard other possibilities as to why someone might be the way s/he is. Like, say, you have a question like 'I'm a very shy person' - and it's interpreted as pointing to being introverted, when in fact the person is a perfectly normal extrovert who just had a slew of bad experiences in his family/school/circle of friends/whatever.

Or, say, a question that measures how are you on the judging/perceiving axis that happens to ask about something you happen to be VERY concerned about, biasing the results towards J.

Also, I think that every person expresses all sixteen combinations in particular situations, and as such the personality type is not a measure of 'what type you are', but more your most likely/frequent personality type.

As for me, upon reading the summaries and remembering the past results, I'm a mostly standard ENTP, with the first and the last being slightly on the fence in tests.
Logged
We are doomed. It's just that whatever is going to kill us all just happens to be, from a scientific standpoint, pretty frickin' awesome.

Greiger

  • Bay Watcher
  • Reptilian Illuminati member. Keep it secret.
    • View Profile
Re: Shit, let's be FEET
« Reply #3106 on: June 15, 2014, 05:09:03 pm »

I (100%) S (1%) T (38%) P (22%)

I've taken the test before but don't recall what I got back then, I know I was high on the Introverted scale back then as well.  I don't mind socializing with people online when I'm physically alone, but I hate being near other people.  I'm usually ok with my small circle of friends but even with them I get to the point eventually where I really want to be alone.

No idea what a 1% On that S means.  Does that mean I don't do either? Or maybe I screwed it up and it has no idea?

I'm also not so sure about that T there.  Sometimes I want to think things out before committing, other times I just want to get it over with and go with my gut, I figure that should probably be a lower percentage.

Not sure what the perceiving over judging is even supposed to mean.

Funnily enough I clicked on the career choices thing and the first thing that came up is computer science and software engineering.  Well whaddaya know that's more or less what I just got a degree in.
« Last Edit: June 15, 2014, 05:11:32 pm by Greiger »
Logged
Disclaimer: Not responsible for dwarven deaths from the use or misuse of this post.
Quote
I don't need friends!! I've got knives!!!

Glloyd

  • Bay Watcher
  • Against the Tide
    • View Profile
Re: Shit, let's be FEET
« Reply #3107 on: June 15, 2014, 05:09:57 pm »

INTP

Introvert(11%)  iNtuitive(38%)  Thinking(38%)  Perceiving(11%)

    You have slight preference of Introversion over Extraversion (11%)
    You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing (38%)
    You have moderate preference of Thinking over Feeling (38%)
    You have slight preference of Perceiving over Judging (11%)

It's all pretty slight preference though. I prefer to think of myself as an introverted extrovert, because while I do prefer to be alone, I don't have any troubles interacting with larger groups of people, and I'm very energetic and enthusiastic when in situations like that. I would just much rather be alone, or with a small group of people (1-3).

The rest seems more like me, especially reading the analysis. I have trouble making decisions, but I'm also pretty relaxed about how those decisions end up.

To quote:

Quote
The open-endedness (from Perceiving) conjoined with the need for competence (NT) is expressed in a sense that one's conclusion may well be met by an equally plausible alternative solution, and that, after all, one may very well have overlooked some critical bit of data.

Which is how I am, to a degree. However, I'm less inclined towards math than the analysis says is average. The games part applies, except that word games bore the hell out of me, but I love all things strategy. The rules thing doesn't really apply for me though, I HATE following rules, and doing things by the books. However, that may just be the ADHD part of me :P

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: Shit, let's be FEET
« Reply #3108 on: June 15, 2014, 05:11:18 pm »

No idea what a 1% On that S means.  Does that mean I don't do either?
A low score in a letter means you encompass traits of both letters and do not have a strong preference of one over the other. As such, your result would be better shown as IXTP.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

Remuthra

  • Bay Watcher
  • I live once more...
    • View Profile
Re: Shit, let's be FEET
« Reply #3109 on: June 15, 2014, 05:11:33 pm »

Introvert(44%)  iNtuitive(62%)  Thinking(100%)  Judging(11%)

    You have moderate preference of Introversion over Extraversion (44%)
    You have distinct preference of Intuition over Sensing (62%)
    You have strong preference of Thinking over Feeling (100%)
    You have slight preference of Judging over Perceiving (11%)

Well that's certainly a thing.

Vector

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Shit, let's be FEET
« Reply #3110 on: June 15, 2014, 05:12:37 pm »

.
« Last Edit: March 27, 2018, 07:15:05 pm by Vector »
Logged
"The question of the usefulness of poetry arises only in periods of its decline, while in periods of its flowering, no one doubts its total uselessness." - Boris Pasternak

nonbinary/genderfluid/genderqueer renegade mathematician and mafia subforum limpet. please avoid quoting me.

pronouns: prefer neutral ones, others are fine. height: 5'3".

MorleyDev

  • Bay Watcher
  • "It is not enough for it to just work."
    • View Profile
    • MorleyDev
Re: Shit, let's be FEET
« Reply #3111 on: June 15, 2014, 05:13:07 pm »

Personally, I always had trouble identifying as an INTJ because I don't feel especially competent. I realize that I apparently radiate competence and authority, but I very much don't feel that way; I'm easily intimidated by most authority figures. The systems I enjoy building are theoretical more than practical, I fantasize rather a lot, and I typically find real-world application boring. Ah well. The particulars may not be accurate, but the shoe fits.

I doubt there are that many competent people in the world who actually feel competent. And there are many utterly incompetent people who are completely convinced of their own competence. One of the things about truly being competent is that it requires you to know how much better you could be, which makes you feel less competent because there's always something else you could do better.

Especially since everybody is comparing the inside of their head to the outside of the people they see, and inside a persons head is a scary place to be in comparison. I know, I'm in one right now :) There's a reason that a lot of the people who you'd think of as being calm and controlled will often suffer from a lot of stress-related illnesses.
« Last Edit: June 15, 2014, 05:16:49 pm by MorleyDev »
Logged

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: Shit, let's be FEET
« Reply #3112 on: June 15, 2014, 05:18:11 pm »

Vec: It's probably worth keeping in mind that the INTJ brand of confidence is expressed through Extroverted Thinking. The certainty of one's own knowledge and skill in a focused area, expressed to others. A particularly confident INTJ is just somebody who learns to apply this in a social context, thus literally being as confident about other people liking them as they are that the entropy of a closed system will always increase.

For example, you may find yourself cowed by authority figures, but I doubt you'd let them get away with stating blatantly false mathematical principles or claiming that Russian poetry is always terrible.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

penguinofhonor

  • Bay Watcher
  • Minister of Love
    • View Profile
Re: Shit, let's be FEET
« Reply #3113 on: June 15, 2014, 05:23:46 pm »

I'm INTP! The description thingy is 50% spot on and 50% kind of similar to how I act. I feel like those things are written vaguely and broadly like horoscopes, anyway.
Logged

Vector

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Shit, let's be FEET
« Reply #3114 on: June 15, 2014, 05:26:48 pm »

.
« Last Edit: March 27, 2018, 07:15:01 pm by Vector »
Logged
"The question of the usefulness of poetry arises only in periods of its decline, while in periods of its flowering, no one doubts its total uselessness." - Boris Pasternak

nonbinary/genderfluid/genderqueer renegade mathematician and mafia subforum limpet. please avoid quoting me.

pronouns: prefer neutral ones, others are fine. height: 5'3".

TD1

  • Bay Watcher
  • Childe Roland to the Dark Tower Came
    • View Profile
Re: Shit, let's be FEET
« Reply #3115 on: June 15, 2014, 05:28:09 pm »

Just read up on INFP.
Yep.
It's eerily accurate, too.

Still, they don't explain a lot of things about me. It's just that the little parts they explain are really accurate.

It suits me down to the ground. Even the bit about getting riled up about a cause.
Logged
Life before death, strength before weakness, journey before destination
  TD1 has claimed the title of Penblessed the Endless Fountain of Epics!
Sigtext!
Poetry Thread

MetalSlimeHunt

  • Bay Watcher
  • Gerrymander Commander
    • View Profile
Re: Shit, let's be FEET
« Reply #3116 on: June 15, 2014, 05:34:24 pm »

Oh, is that how that works.
Indeed, and while it has probably happened at least by chance to you at some point, if it hasn't you should give shifting Extroverted Thinking to socialization a shot. It's pretty hard to do intentionally or unintentionally, but it's an amazing feeling when it does happen. If you've ever had a time in which everybody seemed to fall in line and obey you while you expressed simple certainty of something, that's that.
Quote
And yes, you're absolutely correct on the latter point.

there are people who actually don't do that, aren't there ._.
Indeed there are. I've gotten "you can just let people be wrong [MSH], why do you have to cause so much trouble" more than once. Earlier in my life those comments made me anxious, but now they just make me angry.
Logged
Quote from: Thomas Paine
To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture.
Quote
No Gods, No Masters.

SalmonGod

  • Bay Watcher
  • Nyarrr
    • View Profile
Re: Shit, let's be FEET
« Reply #3117 on: June 15, 2014, 05:36:01 pm »

J thinks things out, P makes snap decisions. 1% S means that you tend slightly more towards experiencing sensation, rather than sitting in your head and thinking about stuff that's not going on right now.

Really?... it's been a few years since I read deep into this stuff, but this is the opposite of what I remember.  What I recall is that J is a preference for decision-making over information-gathering, and P is the opposite.  Someone who is 100% P will just gather information and categorize hypotheticals forever, and never make a real decision until forced... like me.

The T/F split is about using cognitive vs. emotional decision-making processes.

I've seen this one described as subjective vs objective style thinking, and that made a lot of sense to me.
« Last Edit: June 15, 2014, 05:42:01 pm by SalmonGod »
Logged
In the land of twilight, under the moon
We dance for the idiots
As the end will come so soon
In the land of twilight

Maybe people should love for the sake of loving, and not with all of these optimization conditions.

Parsely

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • My games!
Re: Shit, let's be FEET
« Reply #3118 on: June 15, 2014, 05:39:15 pm »

Extravert(28%)  iNtuitive(12%)  Thinking(1%)  Perceiving(28%)
You have moderate preference of Extraversion over Introversion (28%)
You have slight preference of Intuition over Sensing (12%)
You have marginal or no preference of Thinking over Feeling (1%)
You have moderate preference of Perceiving over Judging (28%)
Logged

Remuthra

  • Bay Watcher
  • I live once more...
    • View Profile
Re: Shit, let's be FEET
« Reply #3119 on: June 15, 2014, 05:40:05 pm »

Oh, is that how that works.
Indeed, and while it has probably happened at least by chance to you at some point, if it hasn't you should give shifting Extroverted Thinking to socialization a shot. It's pretty hard to do intentionally or unintentionally, but it's an amazing feeling when it does happen. If you've ever had a time in which everybody seemed to fall in line and obey you while you expressed simple certainty of something, that's that.
Yep, at a certain point you can be certain enough that something is so that it suddenly becomes that way. I wrote a bit of a paper on the effect a while ago.
Pages: 1 ... 206 207 [208] 209 210 ... 375