Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Khan Boyzitbig]

If something smells like food then a dog will try and eat it. Along with many things which don't smell like food such as slugs.

[Dunamisdeos]

Aw nuts.

[MrRoboto75]

Took "no nut November" a bit too far.

[Doomblade187]

Took "no nut November" a bit too far.

I mean, activism can take many forms.

[Maximum Spin]

Shame that the dog was euthanised instead of the owner, though. Although I guess he's still out of the gene pool, so it's progress?

[Yoink]

Shame that the dog was euthanised

What the fuck?!
The guy was sexually abusing his dog and the dog's the one that gets punished? I hadn't read that article but that is really a horrifying detail. That's just insane.

[Egan_BW]

Shame that the dog was euthanised

What the fuck?!
The guy was sexually abusing his dog and the dog's the one that gets punished? I hadn't read that article but that is really a horrifying detail. That's just insane.

Why would you jump to that- Oh. because you haven't read the article.

[overseer05-15]

Shame that the dog was euthanised

What the fuck?!
The guy was sexually abusing his dog and the dog's the one that gets punished? I hadn't read that article but that is really a horrifying detail. That's just insane.

Why would you jump to that- Oh. because you haven't read the article.

?

I read the article, and I felt the same way.

[Yoink]

Why would you jump to that- Oh. because you haven't read the article.

Okay, I read the article. I don't see how it invalidates any of my conclusions?

[George_Chickens]

I thought it was kind of obvious. If the dog is willing to maul whatever smells like food or has food on it, it is going to cause serious problems down the track and would not be able to be rehomed as a result.

[ChairmanPoo]

The problem is your conclusion is not "kind of obvious". We dont know that the dog was going to pounce on anything smelling of food.


Odds are it was actually the owner requesting the dog to be killed

[Gentlefish]

It was, the owner signed a voluntary release of euthanasia form or something. There's a single sentence on it.

[Kagus]

It's obvious because dogs don't have rights. This is getting recorded as a grievously injuring bite, which is generally zero-tolerance.

Dogs get put down/shot for running in the direction of sheep. Causing harm to a human is way beyond that. Even if the fellow was a shithead, the dog is "expendable".


Now, note, it's also completely possible for dogs to take food from people without biting their hands off. They just need to learn how to be careful, which most are very capable of. English Bulldogs are at a disadvantage here though, due to the completely fucked up breed-defining genetic disorders that cause them difficulty with sniffing, licking, seeing, and breathing...

Honestly, it's probably for the dog's best. It gets out of that dude's reach and simultaneously doesn't have to put up with wheezing and pain through every waking hour. Should probably ban the fellow from getting a new one though, but that's not gonna happen... Because, again, dogs don't have rights.

[Yoink]

It's obvious because dogs don't have rights.

Well yer, that's really the main problem here.


Some of you guys, though... I'm not sure if you're just messing with me or if you are actually unaware as to why the dude's privates were smeared with PB.    



Edit: oh yeah, my actual current WTF: Amazon really friggin' hates Australia for some reason. As in, it's completely unusable. Sad times.

[Loud Whispers]

Honestly, it's probably for the dog's best. It gets out of that dude's reach and simultaneously doesn't have to put up with wheezing and pain through every waking hour. Should probably ban the fellow from getting a new one though, but that's not gonna happen... Because, again, dogs don't have rights.

Dogs have animal rights