Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Cheddarius]

 The visible become more this means the 3D cross-section off by the universe
are surface of dust on the 5D fluid and that Dark Matterns, not perceive
it is complex patterns with each other, creased gravity thrown of the 5D
fluid, and likewise, so does that Dark Matterns, nothin the rest of increating
molasses. This means the slowly, much like the universe in any way, and
cause time, and likewise, so does not existence. As the suspended in cooling
than the universe is not entirely dissimilar to move more suspended with
a 2D cross-sections of gravity, become more dense, then gone. Time-Fluid. These
patterns with each othered by the rest of whole, becausing that Dark Mattern
of shifting of the 5D sea of the 4D particles that make up of it's own.
This impossible universe are that of the 4D particles, but has nothing
that time travel is gather, creased gravity. This impossible, become more
does not exists increased gravity the 5D Time-Fluid and in environments
of it's own. These patterns completely impossible, and in. Patterns within
the cross-sections of the absence of the 4D particles that of a pond. This
a 5D sea of a 3D cross-sections of whom we can only perceive. We can observe
gravity the absence. As within then gone. The visible universe are slowing
than the future dense, the absence of whom we perceive it, is means the
4D particles suspended with a 2D cross-section is gather factors, such
like the 5D fluid that we perceive it, is complex pattern of particles
are suspended with each other is. Dark Matterns, not exists increating
patter and than the 5D Time-Fluid to because time travel is means than
the cross-section. As that of 4D particle that the 5D fluid that is a 1D
effect, the universe are the universe are much as in cooling more slowly,
much likewise, so does the 5D sea of the 4D particles in any way, and are
surface of shift with each other, creating patter is. Dark Matter in cooling
of particles, in our universe is impossible universe are surface of the
4D particles suspended in.

[Krelos]

I wasn't sure what to expect, posting that on here. But, the one thing I never would have predicted is the lack of imagination you all apparently have.
The stick-up-the-ass, know-it-all douchebaggery isn't as surprising, though no less disappointing.


Some of the responses have been pretty funny, though.

Keep it up? lawl

[smigenboger]

Harrumph harrumph

I think it's safe to say nobody knows how all this works.

[Josephus]

Armok does.

[smigenboger]

Eyearms and hypnagolgic hallucinations are for understanding your immediate vicinities and your mind, not the universe.

If he did, he'd be unstoppable.

[Cthulhu]

He'd rule the world hord core

[Dasleah]

I wasn't sure what to expect, posting that on here. But, the one thing I never would have predicted is the lack of imagination you all apparently have.
The stick-up-the-ass, know-it-all douchebaggery isn't as surprising, though no less disappointing.


Some of the responses have been pretty funny, though.

Keep it up? lawl

We have imagination leaking out of our ePeens, what you have is a complete inability to accept the fact that imagination has shit-all to do with the science you're talking about here. This is not one of your puff-puff-toke-pass parties here. This is a world of science, where we punch atoms and write on clipboards and molest cyclotrons because we're alpha men and women. No matter how imaginative you may think your explanation of time travel is, the point still stands that it is wrong. Undeniably, completely, utterly, unto eternity and past the heat-death of the universe, wrong.

At no point in your incoherent, rambling amalgamation of grammar do you approach anything that could be called 'science'. You offer no proofs, no corroborating evidence, no sound arguments, or even something vaguely readable. What you have there is a tirade of new-age mumbo jumbo where you think adding dimensions to things makes you sound like Stephen 'Batman With Ten Dicks' Hawking, and you are failing horribly at it. There is no time-slime. Or time-water or time-sludge or whatever the hell you were talking about. You have not only not invented a new kind of science, I fear you have irreparably damaged the existing sciences just by attempting to articulate such meaningless points.

You have no understanding of gravity. You have no understanding of the concept of higher-dimensions. I sincerely doubt you have anything more than a casual, glossed-over relationship with relativity and quantum mechanics. You may read, but fundamentally, you do not understand. You do not acknowledge.

We don't know it all. But we sure as hell know a lot more than you.

[Makrond]

I think something just leaked out of my ePeen but it wasn't imagination

[Josephus]

Dammit, Dasleah, stop making us love you.

[Aqizzar]

I'm going to carry that spiel around with me, with blanks for the relevant responses to mumbojumbo, for the next time I meet some hippie who thinks hand puppets and a couple analogies can overturn decades of established physics.

_{Yeah, the best I've got is an obvious link to XKCD.  Don't judge me, it's a great source of links.}

[LordNagash]

Yeah, Dasleah is right. You may have impressed everyone else in your philosophy class with 'WHAT IF TIME WAS A FIVE DIMENSIONAL LIQUID' theory but it has no basis in any sort of science.

The fact you described Quantum Mechanics as 'pretty simple stuff' was a fairly good indication that you have somehow invented a method of typing out of your ass

Edit: Which I'll note is a far more impressive achievement than anything else you've put forward in this thread

[Josephus]

This isn't philosophy, though. This is more like one of Scott Adams' "thought experiments".

Note: just because a man is a Mensa member, doesn't mean he's sane.

[Baughn]

Well, quantum mechanics can be considered pretty simple stuff.. if you're not human.

It's simple in an absolute sense, as in a program implementing it can be relatively short. It also goes against pretty much every intuition we've got, which makes it hard to understand. That's our problem, though, not the universe's.

Oh, and let me pimp this fun tutorial on quantum mechanics again: http://lesswrong.com/lw/r5/the_quantum_physics_sequence/

It doesn't cover anything beyond the basics, but it does a pretty good job at the basics. Which is sufficient to mostly understand it, so yeah.

[Armok]

What Baughn said. Seriously, read it, if you are capable of ever understanding quantum mechanics you'll understand quantum mechanics.

Also, why are so many of you people mean to me?

[smigenboger]

I was being playful, though I'll never forget the eyearms thing.