Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Criptfeind]

Toaster is voting me.

And we still have room in the 100% win cabal.

[Pandarsenic]

Cript, I'm pretty sure something is wrong with your math. If you even care.

[Criptfeind]

Okay. Go and find it. I have been over it many time but I do not profess to being that good at math.

[Criptfeind]

There are seven slots for winners. One is taken up by someone not in the cabal. So six left.

I need eight people to have a majority over the voting and can put whoever I want in as a winner.

That means two of my people have to lose.

Lonewolf and D have said they will take the hit.

Six slots Six people.

6/6=1=100%

[Pandarsenic]

85% = 17/20 = wat?

[Criptfeind]

What does that have to do with it?

Can you give me a summary like I gave you?

[SHAD0Wdump]

Basically, he pointed out a number you already fudged up.

[Pandarsenic]

Sure, here's a summary:

In a group of 8, one has to lose (1/8 = 12.5% chance of being selected as a loser). But Toony metaphorically surfed on a metaphorical wave of awesomeness to victory, meaning you're already at 2/8 (25%) of you having to lose. Furthermore, each time you elect someone else your potential victory chance lowers, even assuming perfect cooperation from prior winners.

[Criptfeind]

Not really. He took two numbers that are in this game and Divided one by the other. I can not see how that has anything to do with what I am doing.

Look:

1/20= 5%

I took two numbers in this game. Does this mean that only 5% of the people in this game will win? No,

If you or him can point out WHY those number mean what I am trying to do is wrong tell me.

Sure, here's a summary:

In a group of 8, one has to lose (1/8 = 12.5% chance of being selected as a loser). But Toony metaphorically surfed on a metaphorical wave of awesomeness to victory, meaning you're already at 2/8 (25%) of you having to lose. Furthermore, each time you elect someone else your potential victory chance lowers, even assuming perfect cooperation from prior winners.

Your summary is ignoring Diablous and lonewolf.

Toaster is voting me

Ops he is on the list, was not lonewolf voteing me?

[Criptfeind]

Criptfiend

Here it is.

[Pandarsenic]

Diablous, Lonewolf I, if you're really just joining so you can make other people win, you should make me win.

[Criptfeind]

Diablous, Lonewolf I, if you're really just joining so you can make other people win, you should make me win.

You stand for chaos and disorder. Why would they want to do that?

[Pandarsenic]

You stand for chaos and disorder.

Awww, you flatterer <3

Why would they want to do that?

'Cause I'll be more entertaining, of course!

[Cheeetar]

Criptfiend

Here it is.

Votecount corrected.

[Criptfeind]

Have you at least given up grasping for straws and making mathematical errors to make me look bad?