Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: I am going to attempt a 16x16 embark  (Read 9176 times)

neosorcerer

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: I am going to attempt a 16x16 embark
« Reply #15 on: June 23, 2010, 03:55:54 pm »

16x16 in a pocket region without caverns or any underground features will work with about 100 fps at embark.
Logged

C4lv1n

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: I am going to attempt a 16x16 embark
« Reply #16 on: June 23, 2010, 05:15:50 pm »

While it didn't work, I've found that a 16x1 embark using nano for works pretty well, gives you plenty of variety.
Logged
I've played a guitar with my penis.

Z1000000m

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: I am going to attempt a 16x16 embark
« Reply #17 on: June 23, 2010, 05:42:15 pm »

While it didn't work, I've found that a 16x1 embark using nano for works pretty well, gives you plenty of variety.

16x1? not much room for megaprojects

scrap that, just build a dwarven firerailgun, and point in in direction of the nearest forest retreat
Logged

Noble Digger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: I am going to attempt a 16x16 embark
« Reply #18 on: June 23, 2010, 09:46:25 pm »

Heya calvin;

I did this 16x16 embark thing a couple times. The FPS is playable until you do pretty much anything that modifies the pathing grid in more than a few world tiles. By the time I had 12 dwarves and maybe 1 year worth of basic rooms dug out, I had bled out down to 33fps, I knew it wasn't going to remain playable for long. I have not tried this in 3108+ which gets globally better FPS for me than the 40x versions did, but even if it was 20% better it would be a curiosity at best... FYI, my specs 6gb of ram which DF doesn't need or use, a core i7 nehalem which DF doesn't know how to use, a 9800gt which DF doesn't need or really benefit from, all on Evga mobo with no raid array or anything of the sort.

Notably, exporting local images and compressing images seems gouts faster than before my pc upgrade but overall, it hasn't change DF speed very much. It seems like init tweaks matter more than hardware... If I ran DF on a Raid 0 array I would expect much faster seek times on loading the game but that probably doesn't speed up pathfinding at all since DF isn't having to use the page file or anything. Good luck !
Logged
quib·ble
1. To evade the truth or importance of an issue by raising trivial distinctions and objections.
2. To find fault or criticize for petty reasons; cavil.

Lord Snow

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: I am going to attempt a 16x16 embark
« Reply #19 on: June 24, 2010, 05:18:14 am »

http://img443.imageshack.us/i/unbenanntlc.png/

16x16 embark, little grassland at the bottom left, rest pure mountain (i figured the lack of trees might help).

took a while longer to load, maybe close to 2 minutes, but there it is. FPS plummeted to 3 immediatly, but now its up to merry 50 FPS, pre-ordering some digging etc.

i'll see what happens when i tell my dwarves to work some.

FPS down to 30 while my horde of 7 dwarves attempt to path across 8 tiles worth of landscape to start digging and put things in a stockpile close to the only initial water source for farms.

i wont be playing this, but it's definitely possible. My specs aren't uber either: Core2Duo E6600 oc'ed to 3ghz, 4gb ram limited to 3 by 32bit OS, geforce 8800.


And for all those neverending "multicores wont help" complaints: YES THEY FUCKING WILL. Not because they can all be used, but because every damned individual core in these processors is better, even at much lower #ghz, than an old AMD or pentium4 single core.
Architecture has improved lots, making things so much more effective, its really hard to believe until you upgrade.
« Last Edit: June 24, 2010, 05:31:25 am by Lord Snow »
Logged

Askot Bokbondeler

  • Bay Watcher
  • please line up orderly
    • View Profile
Re: I am going to attempt a 16x16 embark
« Reply #20 on: June 24, 2010, 05:23:06 am »

the lack of trees? what about the massive amount of extra z levels?

breadbocks

  • Bay Watcher
  • A manacled Mentlegen. (ಠ_ృ)
    • View Profile
Re: I am going to attempt a 16x16 embark
« Reply #21 on: June 24, 2010, 10:06:55 am »

Interesting. Noble, DF2010 helps A LOT. I've experienced an average of a 325% increase in FPS, from ~20, to ~85, but I've seen 250 on a 2x3. On a duel core Intel® Atom™ N450 NETBOOK processor! A NETBOOK. Insanity.
Logged
Clearly, cakes are the next form of human evolution.

Noble Digger

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: I am going to attempt a 16x16 embark
« Reply #22 on: June 24, 2010, 05:26:42 pm »

I did my largest long-term 40x fortress right before 31x was released, on a 9x9 extremely mountainous embark (Check out Moonsyrups at DFMA) and stuck at about 21 FPS the whole time I played it, once the initial fortress was built up. This is during heavy workload--it does idle in the 30s. I would LOVE to be able to play that fort in the modern DF, as it ran for some 15 or 20 years and had a lot of really sweet, awesome, long-term mega-constructions finished. The FPS was just low enough to make it a large timesink to do any large-scale dumping. Also, my giant cave spiders never bred, which made me really sad. Apparently fertility must exist at worldgen for existing creatures to mate. :(

My current fort in 31.08 (check out Beandagger at DFMA) is just a 3x3 embark, current has 20 dwarves. 3 are children and 3 are soldiers. My pop is capped at 75 but for whatever reason I'm just not getting anymore immigrants--possibly because I have child cap turned on. In any case, I have tried hard to emphasize reducing traffic density by using highly-distributed workshops and stockpiles with numerous connections to adjecent rooms, wide hallways, vertical paths everywhere, and frequent culling of livestock. The underground is totally sealed off and I've drained the largest pond... This fort stays at 60.00 FPS no matter what I do, which is amaaaaaazing. I only give the dwarves one major type of work at a time, and they absolutely skullfuck any mass job in half a season.

Gonna go upload the fort again, as the current post is pretty outdated...
Logged
quib·ble
1. To evade the truth or importance of an issue by raising trivial distinctions and objections.
2. To find fault or criticize for petty reasons; cavil.

ItchyBeard

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: I am going to attempt a 16x16 embark
« Reply #23 on: June 24, 2010, 11:32:30 pm »

Embarking on a 16x16 map is a good way to find the...
Logged

Ice36bc

  • Escaped Lunatic
    • View Profile
Re: I am going to attempt a 16x16 embark
« Reply #24 on: December 23, 2014, 02:48:26 am »

Microsoft windows has a memory ram cop of 2gb(it is probably lower) for programs & games, the only way to play the biggest maps to hack windows, this came up during modding fallout or skyrim i think it was a way, way back, i can't really remember any thing more. i thing your ok if your using linux.
Logged

Reelya

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: I am going to attempt a 16x16 embark
« Reply #25 on: December 23, 2014, 02:55:20 am »

Microsoft windows has a memory ram cop of 2gb(it is probably lower) for programs & games, the only way to play the biggest maps to hack windows, this came up during modding fallout or skyrim i think it was a way, way back, i can't really remember any thing more. i thing your ok if your using linux.

^ Really big necro here, 4+ years. The fix is discussed here:

http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=101046.0

Never tried it myself, but by using a Large Address Aware hack you can get DF using 3GB on 32bit systems and 4GB on 64bit systems. Perfect for getting those 16x16 embarks working.

Orange Wizard

  • Bay Watcher
  • mou ii yo
    • View Profile
    • S M U G
Re: I am going to attempt a 16x16 embark
« Reply #26 on: December 23, 2014, 04:26:14 am »

Yes, but why did you necro a thread from four years ago?
Logged
Please don't shitpost, it lowers the quality of discourse
Hard science is like a sword, and soft science is like fear. You can use both to equally powerful results, but even if your opponent disbelieve your stabs, they will still die.

Reelya

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: I am going to attempt a 16x16 embark
« Reply #27 on: December 23, 2014, 04:34:09 am »

Check the date on what I quoted. I put a caret ^ before my comment to indicate that I was referring to the quoted text as the necro.
« Last Edit: December 23, 2014, 04:36:43 am by Reelya »
Logged

Orange Wizard

  • Bay Watcher
  • mou ii yo
    • View Profile
    • S M U G
Re: I am going to attempt a 16x16 embark
« Reply #28 on: December 23, 2014, 04:36:16 am »

*shuffles off into a corner*
Logged
Please don't shitpost, it lowers the quality of discourse
Hard science is like a sword, and soft science is like fear. You can use both to equally powerful results, but even if your opponent disbelieve your stabs, they will still die.

LordBaal

  • Bay Watcher
  • System Lord and Hanslanda lees evil twin.
    • View Profile
Re: I am going to attempt a 16x16 embark
« Reply #29 on: December 23, 2014, 04:56:16 pm »

Taking the opportunity I made this exactly.
Vanilla df 40.22
Large Address Awareness
Intel Core i3-2120, 3.30 GHz
8 Gb of DDR3
Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bits

It was incapable of loading the site, got to 4 gigs and crashed.
Logged
I'm curious as to how a tank would evolve. Would it climb out of the primordial ooze wiggling it's track-nubs, feeding on smaller jeeps before crawling onto the shore having evolved proper treds?
My ship exploded midflight, but all the shrapnel totally landed on Alpha Centauri before anyone else did.  Bow before me world leaders!
Pages: 1 [2] 3