Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[webadict]

Wow, way to instill WIFOM, Mr.Person, especially after saying you'd rather have supported me. That seems like an effective way to make everyone suspicious of everything, don't you think?

[Mr.Person]

Wow, way to instill WIFOM, Mr.Person, especially after saying you'd rather have supported me. That seems like an effective way to make everyone suspicious of everything, don't you think?

WIFOM, you say? Now how exactly is anything I've said WIFOM?

[webadict]

Really? Really?!? You just said that I could be a Pillar of the Community! You moron! Did you have short term memory loss?!? You're pre-WIFOMing my death!

[Pandarsenic]

Wow, just wow.

[Jim Groovester]

Question: What's a Pillar of the Community? It's a role I've never heard of.

[webadict]

It's a mafia role that comes up town on death. Think mafia antimiller.

[Zako]

It was hard to vote for one of these guys cheeetar, cause they both look town to me, but I voted webadict because he looked a bit more like scum then General, but I have changed my mind but can't change my assist. Sadly.

Don't make stuff up and don't twist words. I never said your opinion was crap. I showed that it didn't make sense. I never said anybody else had scummy arguments. I said people who made scummy arguments made scummy arguments. (In other words: I'm not saying defending Webadict is scummy, I'm saying defending him with scummy arguments is scummy).

Where am I making stuff up? Point that out for me please, because I'm telling the truth and your just jumping to accusations with no proof. And you sure made it look like your saying my opinion is crap by saying anyone defending webadict is surely scum, just because you think he is. And how are my arguemetns scummy? And just because I'm siding with webadict on this means I'm buddying with him? Even though I have never done that before in this thread? Your the one who's making things up, scum.

[Cheeetar]

Did you read anything I said?

Don't make stuff up and don't twist words. I never said your opinion was crap. I showed that it didn't make sense. I never said anybody else had scummy arguments. I said people who made scummy arguments made scummy arguments. (In other words: I'm not saying defending Webadict is scummy, I'm saying defending him with scummy arguments is scummy).

[Zako]

You haven't answered any of my questions. And where in my defences of webadict are they scummy?

[Jim Groovester]

It was hard to vote for one of these guys cheeetar, cause they both look town to me, but I voted webadict because he looked a bit more like scum then General, but I have changed my mind but can't change my assist. Sadly.

What the hell are you talking about? You didn't vote webadict. And even if you did, what the hell are you doing voting people you think are town?

And what the hell are you doing not keeping your stories' straight?

[Cheeetar]

Jim: His post actually made sense there. By vote for webadict, he meant assisted GeneralGuy. He assisted the person he thought was least scummy, even though he thought they were both pretty non-scummy, which makes sense because not using his assist would have been worse.

[Zako]

Heh, I have a somewhat warped mind. I tend to mistype at times.

[Jim Groovester]

Jim: His post actually made sense there. By vote for webadict, he meant assisted GeneralGuy. He assisted the person he thought was least scummy, even though he thought they were both pretty non-scummy, which makes sense because not using his assist would have been worse.

Very well, carry on.

[Cheeetar]

Zako:

Spoiler: Post (click to show/hide)

Where am I making stuff up? Point that out for me please, because I'm telling the truth and your just jumping to accusations with no proof.

Spoiler: Response (click to show/hide)

Here is you lying and twisting words:

I'm sure that even a newbie like me can see that saying someones opinion is crap isn't scumhunting.

I never said your opinion was crap.

And who exactly are making scummy arguements out of everyone who is defending webadict? Please point this out.

I never said anybody was making a scummy argument but you. I said 'scummy arguments are scummy'.

And you sure made it look like your saying my opinion is crap by saying anyone defending webadict is surely scum, just because you think he is.

I never said anybody defending Webadict was scum.

Spoiler: Post (click to show/hide)

And how are my arguemetns scummy?

Spoiler: Response (click to show/hide)

This is me explaining how your arguments make no sense, and are thus scummy (a scum would make an argument to defend their scumbuddy regardless of how much sense it made to defend them):

No, town isn't meant to look scummy on purpose. That's the jesters job. You seem to be mistaking scumhunting with confusing the hell out of town.

So your saying my arguements are worth nothing? That seems real scummy Cheeetar, discrediting a opinion like that.

It's called scumhunting.

Spoiler: Post and Response (click to show/hide)

And just because I'm siding with webadict on this means I'm buddying with him? Even though I have never done that before in this thread?

If you are scum and Webadict is scum, you are scumbuddies. I am not saying you are buddying with him, I am saying you are scumbuddies.

[Zako]

Zako:

Spoiler: Post (click to show/hide)

Where am I making stuff up? Point that out for me please, because I'm telling the truth and your just jumping to accusations with no proof.

Spoiler: Response (click to show/hide)

Here is you lying and twisting words:

I'm sure that even a newbie like me can see that saying someones opinion is crap isn't scumhunting.

I never said your opinion was crap.

And who exactly are making scummy arguements out of everyone who is defending webadict? Please point this out.

I never said anybody was making a scummy argument but you. I said 'scummy arguments are scummy'.

And you sure made it look like your saying my opinion is crap by saying anyone defending webadict is surely scum, just because you think he is.

I never said anybody defending Webadict was scum.

Spoiler: Post (click to show/hide)

And how are my arguemetns scummy?

Spoiler: Response (click to show/hide)

This is me explaining how your arguments make no sense, and are thus scummy (a scum would make an argument to defend their scumbuddy regardless of how much sense it made to defend them):

No, town isn't meant to look scummy on purpose. That's the jesters job. You seem to be mistaking scumhunting with confusing the hell out of town.

So your saying my arguements are worth nothing? That seems real scummy Cheeetar, discrediting a opinion like that.

It's called scumhunting.

Spoiler: Post and Response (click to show/hide)

And just because I'm siding with webadict on this means I'm buddying with him? Even though I have never done that before in this thread?

If you are scum and Webadict is scum, you are scumbuddies. I am not saying you are buddying with him, I am saying you are scumbuddies.

You are implying that because I am scum, noone should listen to me. Therefore, you are implying that my arguments have no backbone, no sustenience, no meaning to them. In other words, you think they are crap.

And you STILL haven't produced a single "scummy argument" from me. Post where my scummy argument is or you are making things up.

Yet you focus on me because I am defending webadict from your outrageous claims. You are hypocritical cheeetar.

You haven't explained anything in that post about how my arguements are scummy.

And because I'm defending webadict and at the same time scummy to you, I must conclude that you think that I'm buddying with him.

And you STILL haven't answered all my questions:

Where am I making stuff up? Point that out for me please, because I'm telling the truth and your just jumping to accusations with no proof. And you sure made it look like your saying my opinion is crap by saying anyone defending webadict is surely scum, just because you think he is. And how are my arguemetns scummy? And just because I'm siding with webadict on this means I'm buddying with him? Even though I have never done that before in this thread? Your the one who's making things up, scum.