Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 1246 1247 [1248] 1249 1250 ... 1347

Author Topic: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games  (Read 2838559 times)

coleslaw35

  • Bay Watcher
  • A disgusting pile of slop.
    • View Profile
    • My YouTube channel where I shitpost
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #18705 on: August 18, 2017, 02:50:03 pm »

I haven't researched anything to do with troops except the brigade transport module, and engineering brigade (I found some ruins). However I started with my RP pre-allocated, so the computer may have researched some beginning troop strength techs for me.  Are those retroactive, or only for newly trained units?

As soon as you research any ground unit strength increases they are immediately applied to all active battalions if I'm not mistaken.

Also, is there anything special about troops, for example, each troop brigade has an associated personnel, but is there a way to set up another position over the individual brigades that would add another bonus? Sort of like planet govs and sector govs?

Once you research a certain ground unit (don't remember which) you get the ability to research Division Headquarters. Once you research and recruit them you can assign Brigade HQs to them.
Logged

Damiac

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #18706 on: August 18, 2017, 03:17:28 pm »

Is it the same 25% of bonus sort of deal? And is it location bound, or bound to a specific ground unit?
Logged

coleslaw35

  • Bay Watcher
  • A disgusting pile of slop.
    • View Profile
    • My YouTube channel where I shitpost
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #18707 on: August 18, 2017, 04:22:12 pm »

Is it the same 25% of bonus sort of deal? And is it location bound, or bound to a specific ground unit?

I'm not sure what the bonuses applied are. All I know is that there is one.

One division HQ can command four brigades. Division HQs don't need to be on the same planet as the brigades they command, but I'm not sure if they need to be in the same system. You can move division HQs around like any other ground unit.
Logged

Damiac

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #18708 on: August 22, 2017, 12:09:43 pm »

I've got another question, although I suspect I already know the answer.

Is there any way to make some kind of auto turns happen when your fleet is wading through salvo after salvo of enemy missiles? My poor finger is getting sore clicking the advanced 5 seconds button 1000 times...

I know you can set a number to force a certain amount of turns, which might be the best I can get, but is there any way to just keep the turns moving until I'm within range of actually firing at these enemies?  I have enough PD to destroy all the missiles, it just takes forever...
Logged

iceball3

  • Bay Watcher
  • Miaou~
    • View Profile
    • My DA
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #18709 on: August 25, 2017, 06:13:08 pm »

I've got another question, although I suspect I already know the answer.

Is there any way to make some kind of auto turns happen when your fleet is wading through salvo after salvo of enemy missiles? My poor finger is getting sore clicking the advanced 5 seconds button 1000 times...

I know you can set a number to force a certain amount of turns, which might be the best I can get, but is there any way to just keep the turns moving until I'm within range of actually firing at these enemies?  I have enough PD to destroy all the missiles, it just takes forever...
You can do forced 5 second increments, calculate the TTI (Time to Intercept) both on your enemy's and own bearing, and autoturn by the set increment in half measures?
Better than crossing your fingers and hoping you don't accidentally faceplant into the ship, and get rammed to death, before being able to respond.
Logged

Damiac

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #18710 on: September 05, 2017, 10:23:42 am »

OK, I ended up starting a new game after losing my whole fleet to some precursor AMM ships. (Seriously, size 1 missiles are silly...)

Anyway, there were some issues with my last game I would like to avoid this time.  This time around, I decided to pretty much forego civilian jump ships, and have been building jump gates pretty much everywhere.  That's kept things simpler from an exploration standpoint.

I've been aggressively colonizing nearby systems, basically anything less than col cost 3 gets a colony and some infrastructure, and then I let the civilians tend to it from there, until I get around to terraforming it.  I've been building construction facilities nonstop at a high rate, and shipping about 150 of them to each colony, and having most of those colonies produce financial centers.  This has kept my wealth just about even, although I'll probably need to research expanded economy soon.

I just finished researching internal confinement fusion engines, and developed a 25% power size 50 250EP commercial engine, which my commercial fleets all use.  This is to make sure my civilians are using as little as possible of my fuel, as I had a problem with that last game.  I've also been shipping a small stream of refineries out to my colonies, as having all my fuel on earth caused me no end of problems with military maneuvers last game.

I've currently got about 700 million people on earth, and a small worker shortage.  My population growth is not keeping up with my production of research facilities, meaning I'm probably going to have to create another research planet.  Is this something that is commonly necessary? I'm about 25 years into my current game.

I've finally teched up to the point where I feel I should start fielding a military, I've got a few hostiles in nearby systems, and I suspect 1 of them may be star swarm.  Actually, 2 races are fitting that profile, but as they were identified as different species, I have to assume one was just a fast beam using NPR.

Now I need to design my warships.  Once again, because I'm a dumb jerk, I'm not using missiles.  I've developed gauss with vel 1, rof 4, and have twin and quad turrets carrying it with 16000 km/s tracking speed, which matches my 4x speed fire control.  I've also got 3 damage lasers with 5 second ROF developed, and also mounted in twin and quad turrets.  The fire control for these is 4x range and 4x speed, giving me something like 100,000 km range and 16000 km/s tracking speed.  I figure that should give me a decent PD envelope, and also allow me to do damage without having to close to point blank range. 

Still, these weapon systems mean I need to be able to close, and the faster the better.  To get the kind of speed I will need, I'm probably going to need boosted engines, meaning bad fuel efficiency (I have 60% fuel efficiency tech at the moment).  So I believe my fleet doctrine will require large fairly fuel efficient carrier/tankers carrying smaller fast attack ships.  But as those fast ships are going to be the ones closing on enemy ships without PD support from the carriers, they need to include enough PD to weather the missile swarm they'll inevitably be flying through.

I'm thinking 40,000 ton carriers, as although I have a 50,000 ton naval shipyard, I won't have enough maintenance capability for that size for a while.  My attack ships size is harder to determine.  Their size is at least partially determined by the hangar space in the carriers, but the speed requirement will probably be the more restrictive parameter.  I want them to go at least 8000 km/s, which I believe should be feasible at my tech level. 

I imagine my carriers will need to be jump capable.  Since my fast ships need the PD to close, I won't be able to protect my carriers very easily, so they'll probably need to jump back out of system after dropping off the battle fleet.  However my fast ships will then need enough range to close to the enemy fleet and destroy them, which may be tricky given the high speed requirement.

So, if you read through that whole wall of text, I have a request of any daring space ship designers.  Can you help me design a carrier and some high speed attack/pd ships?

My base engines are 1000 EP at 100% power, with 60% fuel usage.  I have up to 25% engine boost tech.
I've got quad and dual gauss and laser turrets, I believe the turret gear is size 4 or so which gets it to 16000 km/s tracking, matching my 4x speed 4x range fire control.
PD ships should use gauss turret(s) and 4X speed, 1X range fire controls.  1 Fire control per ship should be enough.
Laser ships should use laser turret(s), and 4X speed, 4X range fire controls.  Again, 1 fire control per ship is enough, unless a single design can carry both gauss and laser turrets, in which case 1 of each fire control should be used (I doubt that's possible at this tech level).

Bonus Challenge: Make the fast laser and pd ships able to be built at the same shipyard.  A midway frankenstein ship design to accomplish this is OK, so long as it doesn't cost more than 50% over the cost of the actual ships.

Keep in mind the carriers need a LOT of range, and don't need to go any faster than 3000 km/s.  A ship that's all hangar bays, commercial engines, engineering spaces, and fuel storage is acceptable.  These things need an AFR of less than 100%, and lots of maint supplies, as they're also maintaining and repairing the fast ships.

The fast ships can have very short deployment times, as I expect they will end up with ranges of about 24-48 hours of travel outside the carrier anyway. A super high AFR is fine on these. The most important thing is speed, as long as they can go 8000 km/s and carry a gun, and still fit in the carrier, they'll fit the bill.

The small ships should fit cleanly into the carriers, but it's also OK if each carrier is sized for 1 pd ship and 1 attack ship, or something like that, if they end up being different sizes.  This may simply not be possible, but it would certainly be nice.
« Last Edit: September 05, 2017, 10:30:05 am by Damiac »
Logged

Madman198237

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #18711 on: September 05, 2017, 11:59:50 am »

I found out yesterday that Aurora can't be played on laptops in its current state.

I am very much disappointed now.
Logged
We shall make the highest quality of quality quantities of soldiers with quantities of quality.

iceball3

  • Bay Watcher
  • Miaou~
    • View Profile
    • My DA
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #18712 on: September 05, 2017, 12:41:59 pm »

I found out yesterday that Aurora can't be played on laptops in its current state.

I am very much disappointed now.
I remember my old laptop had a VGA connector on it, and I was able to pull of playing by having an extra screen.
Logged

Madman198237

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #18713 on: September 05, 2017, 12:48:51 pm »

Would a USB to HDMI connector, wired to a TV, work as well?
Logged
We shall make the highest quality of quality quantities of soldiers with quantities of quality.

Dozebôm Lolumzalìs

  • Bay Watcher
  • what even is truth
    • View Profile
    • test
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #18714 on: September 05, 2017, 01:13:42 pm »

I found out yesterday that Aurora can't be played on laptops in its current state.

I am very much disappointed now.
Try the setting in the furthest-right menu bar. It should shrink the menus a bit. Then look for a window-resizing application if that doesn't work.

Would a USB to HDMI connector, wired to a TV, work as well?
Or that, probably.
Logged
Quote from: King James Programming
...Simplification leaves us with the black extra-cosmic gulfs it throws open before our frenzied eyes...
Quote from: Salvané Descocrates
The only difference between me and a fool is that I know that I know only that I think, therefore I am.
Sigtext!

forsaken1111

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
    • TTB Twitch
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #18715 on: September 05, 2017, 08:09:42 pm »

I found out yesterday that Aurora can't be played on laptops in its current state.

I am very much disappointed now.
I play on a laptop... You haven't tried hard enough
Logged

Rince Wind

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #18716 on: September 06, 2017, 03:16:51 am »

Played it on a 2008 laptop for years.
Logged

Damiac

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #18717 on: September 06, 2017, 07:48:39 am »

Make sure you've selected reduced height windows in the main menu bar, I believe that makes the vertical resolution 800. 
With a 768px height monitor you can then push the title bar up off the top of the screen a tiny bit, auto hide or move your taskbar to the side, and then you should be able to press all the buttons.

If I recall correctly the button that causes the most trouble for people with small windows is the assign button on the bottom right of the civilian assignments screen.  If you can press that button you should be good.

I've played aurora on a few laptops, it's perfectly playable using the reduced height windows.

If your screen height is less than 768 you probably need some desktop resizing tool, as seen in Flying Dice's sig.

Logged

ollobrains

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #18718 on: September 16, 2017, 10:50:44 pm »

yeah the c++ version is slowlly coming about another 6-9 months according to steve, that said it will be playable finally on pretty well a lot of platforms.  And it should be much quicker as well
Logged

se5a

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Aurora - The Dwarf Fortress of 4X Games
« Reply #18719 on: September 17, 2017, 03:49:10 pm »

yeah the c++ version is slowlly coming about another 6-9 months according to steve, that said it will be playable finally on pretty well a lot of platforms.  And it should be much quicker as well

C#. I'm not sure what he's using for the UI stuff if it's WPF I'm not sure how cross platform that's going to be... maybe in wine? idk.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 1246 1247 [1248] 1249 1250 ... 1347