He did something suspicious, I voted him for it. That doesn't necessarily mean that he's guaranteed to be the most likely scum, but it does mean that I'm paying more attention to him.
You're being extremely inconsistent,
JanusTwoFace. I thought our argument meant one of us was almost definately scum? I really don't like the way you're agreeing with me so much either. I mean, quoting parts of my posts just to agree with them while pretending I'm almost confirmed is extremely strange, and I think it's buddying.
Questions:
Are you completely sure Apostolic Nihilist is scum? If not, why aren't you following up any of your scumlist?
I don't think that further fighting strictly between Leafsnail and Apostolic Nihilist would prove beneficial. Without more people on each side mayhaps, but not just those two.
However, if such a fight were to take place, it would be interesting to see if either parties' opinion had changed.
So do you want the fight to continue or not?
You threatened to vote Vector before he made his first content post, which you have since said was unsatisfactory. So are you going to vote him? Do you think he's scum? If you aren't sure, why aren't you trying to find out?
I'll admit that I may have jumped on AN a little strongly, but until he posts some sort of response I'll leave my vote. It's been about 24 hours since his last post here although he joined Horrible Role Mafia about 4 hours ago.
So is it a pressure vote or a lynching vote?
Now,
Eduren. You seem to think I could be scum due to my fight with Apostolic Nihilist. Well, am I? If you aren't sure, why haven't you asked me any questions about it? I find your comment on me in your scumlist confusing, and I'd like you to clarify it.
Now, finally, Apost.
At this point? I still think Leafsnail is scummy. Less so than I did before (admittedly, my attacks were shallow and ridden with holes), but I think the way he behaved yesterday was scummish. Tossing his vote around, for instance. He had somewhat valid reasoning, but it's still odd.
If your grounds for suspecting me happened yesterday, why didn't you mention it more when you attacked me earlier?
Dorf wasn't a bad lynch, but I still don't think he was the 'best'.
If you had someone more scummy than dorf in mind, who were they? Why aren't you pushing them today?
1. He didn't want Zai to be lynched. He could get rid of him at night and prevent his role from being passed on to others.
2. He wanted the suspicions against him to be dropped. He took out dorf, and the push was easy.
These two look like they conflict. If I felt it to be more important to deflect suspicion away from myself, I'd have just plonked my vote on Zai rather than on dorf. Switching votes late is hardly a way to avoid scrutiny, as today has proved. In addition, while a confirmed townie is obviously good for the town, I'd much rather have a dead mafia member than a confirmed townie. Therefore, saying that the scum had to avoid a Zai lynch "At all costs" is completely wrong.
Actually, come to think of it, Pandarsenic changed his vote later than I did, and hasn't said much since. Why are you attacking me while ignoring him? Afterall, one vote alone isn't going to get someone lynched.
Finally,
Pandarsenic, you thought I was scum yesterday, but jumped to dorf for some reason. You haven't done anything of note at all today. What are your suspicions?
Author
Topic: Vote Mafia 4: Let's Bureacratically Solve This! (Game Over! Mafia Win) (Read 37794 times)