Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]

Author Topic: Humans are not within the scope of Darwinism  (Read 6008 times)

Idiom

  • Bay Watcher
  • [NO_THOUGHT]
    • View Profile
Re: Humans are not within the scope of Darwinism
« Reply #60 on: July 30, 2009, 09:47:16 pm »

Darwin's wife had a lesser known theory that wasn't about the fittest.

We need designer babies or we need free healthcare that guarantee's everyone some glasses, diabetic medication and acne medication.
Logged

Ampersand

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Humans are not within the scope of Darwinism
« Reply #61 on: July 30, 2009, 11:36:03 pm »

How is it "artificial"?

The boundaries between guys living on completely different continents is completely natural. You could call the COLLAPSE of those boundaries "artificial" since they rely on human ingenuity and technology, but I'm not sure there's even a meaningful distinction to be made there.

What I meant by artificial boundaries equates to the the apparent preference humans have to breed within their own ethnic group, and other things like that. It is a boundary that exists within the human mind, rather than something that exists outside of us, like an ocean.
Logged
!!&!!

Leafsnail

  • Bay Watcher
  • A single snail can make a world go extinct.
    • View Profile
Re: Humans are not within the scope of Darwinism
« Reply #62 on: July 31, 2009, 06:11:11 am »

Darwin's wife had a lesser known theory that wasn't about the fittest.

We need designer babies or we need free healthcare that guarantee's everyone some glasses, diabetic medication and acne medication.
Well, beauty is, of course, a subjective term, and one that is tied to an average.
Logged

Jude

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Humans are not within the scope of Darwinism
« Reply #63 on: July 31, 2009, 11:51:48 am »

Darwin's wife had a lesser known theory that wasn't about the fittest.

We need designer babies or we need free healthcare that guarantee's everyone some glasses, diabetic medication and acne medication.
Well, beauty is, of course, a subjective term, and one that is tied to an average.

Plus, there's sexual selection, but 95% of people get married and have kids, so it's not really driving things in any particular direction very fast. I'd say we're in the "eq" part of punc eq.
Logged
Quote from: Raphite1
I once started with a dwarf that was "belarded by great hanging sacks of fat."

Oh Jesus

Zironic

  • Bay Watcher
  • [SDRAW_KCAB]
    • View Profile
Re: Humans are not within the scope of Darwinism
« Reply #64 on: August 01, 2009, 02:51:57 am »

The problem is, great intelligence is rarely linked to genetic lineage. It's not like Einstien's kids continued his work.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]