Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 143 144 [145] 146 147 ... 370

Author Topic: Atheists  (Read 404517 times)

Andir

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #2160 on: March 11, 2010, 08:44:20 pm »

because everybody believes something about the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe.

I don't.
If you count random happen chance as a belief, but only if someone asks me, sure.  But I don't live my life trying to make randomness mean something.
Logged
"Having faith" that the bridge will not fall, implies that the bridge itself isn't that trustworthy. It's not that different from "I pray that the bridge will hold my weight."

MrWiggles

  • Bay Watcher
  • Doubt Everything
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #2161 on: March 11, 2010, 08:53:07 pm »

As Penn Juliet once said. Luck is statics taken personally.
Logged
Doesn't like running from bears = clearly isn't an Eastern European
I'm Making a Mush! Navitas: City Limits ~ Inspired by Dresden Files and SCP.
http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=113699.msg3470055#msg3470055
http://www.tf2items.com/id/MisterWigggles666#

Neruz

  • Bay Watcher
  • I see you...
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #2162 on: March 11, 2010, 09:57:14 pm »

because everybody believes something about the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe.

I don't.
If you count random happen chance as a belief, but only if someone asks me, sure.  But I don't live my life trying to make randomness mean something.
The Universe is something so impossibly beyond my comprehension that i don't waste any time trying to pretend i understand anythng about it.

Grakelin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Stay thirsty, my friends
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #2163 on: March 11, 2010, 11:42:16 pm »

Everybody is a religious person, yes, but you know the context that people use the term in. Colloquially, the question 'are you religious' is a question of a person's faith in a higher being. It isn't even a question of Atheism or Theism, since you can say 'No, not really' and still be a Christian, for example.

I'm using the definition provided in this thread by Neruz. This is also the definition given here.

Since we're using Wikipedia, maybe what we want to use is Nontheism, instead of Atheism, as circumstantial non-belief in a deity?
Logged
I am have extensive knowledge of philosophy and a strong morality
Okay, so, today this girl I know-Lauren, just took a sudden dis-interest in talking to me. Is she just on her period or something?

Neruz

  • Bay Watcher
  • I see you...
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #2164 on: March 12, 2010, 01:13:01 am »

That's actually a good link explaining the difference between Atheism and Agnosticism, and, perhaps more importantly, the two main types of Atheism.

dreiche2

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #2165 on: March 12, 2010, 05:43:35 am »

Everybody is a religious person, yes, but you know the context that people use the term in.

That's just not how people use the term, colloquially or not.

I'm using the definition provided in this thread by Neruz. This is also the definition given here.

Neruz' definition as given is just not sufficient. The linked definition actually is, you guys just ignored the rest of the paragraph after the very first snippet:

Quote
a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.

Yes, the later aspects are somewhat optional in themselves ("esp.", "usually", "often"), but that's just because not all of them have to be true always. You would expect at least some of them to be true for something to qualify as a religion.

There might be borderline cases such as certain forms of Buddhism. But science isn't one of them...
Logged

Siquo

  • Bay Watcher
  • Procedurally generated
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #2166 on: March 12, 2010, 05:48:54 am »

You are all individuals!
I don't.
  ;D

Religion and belief are again mixed up here, I think Grakelin meant belief, since that word fits his definition better.
Dreiche2: everyone (most people in this thread) already agreed science isn't one of them, but scientism is.
Logged

This one thread is mine. MIIIIINE!!! And it will remain a happy, friendly, encouraging place, whether you lot like it or not. 
will rena,eme sique to sique sxds-- siquo if sucessufil
(cant spel siqou a. every speling looks wroing (hate this))

Neruz

  • Bay Watcher
  • I see you...
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #2167 on: March 12, 2010, 08:50:21 am »

I'm using the definition provided in this thread by Neruz. This is also the definition given here.

Neruz' definition as given is just not sufficient. The linked definition actually is, you guys just ignored the rest of the paragraph after the very first snippet:

Quote
a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.

Yes, the later aspects are somewhat optional in themselves ("esp.", "usually", "often"), but that's just because not all of them have to be true always. You would expect at least some of them to be true for something to qualify as a religion.

There might be borderline cases such as certain forms of Buddhism. But science isn't one of them...

You said it yourself, the later aspects are optional. Indeed, the vast majority of religions have some of them true as well, but a small handful lack the later aspects, yet still qualify as religions because the only requirements are the former, that of being a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe.

Also, due to the way the English language works, it's possible that while all Religions are a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, not all sets of beliefs concerning the cause nature and purpose of the universe are Religions.

dreiche2

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #2168 on: March 12, 2010, 09:39:02 am »

This is really getting silly.

It's a vague term. It doesn't have a strict definition. Those are the things that are usually associated with it. If none are them are present, it's probably not a religion.

Please tell me:

1. If the requirement ("a set of beliefs about...") by itself is sufficient to make something a religion:

Assume I believe string theory to be true. Does that mean I'm a religious person? That I follow the religion of String Theory?

2. If, however, the requirement is necessary, but not sufficient for something to be a religion, as suggested by your second sentence, but the further characteristics are completely optional: Then please tell me how you would ever tell that something that meets the requirement is not a religion.

3. Finally, please give examples of belief systems commonly or scholarly thought of as religions that do not meet any of the other criteria.

Edit: clarification

« Last Edit: March 12, 2010, 09:42:33 am by dreiche2 »
Logged

Neruz

  • Bay Watcher
  • I see you...
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #2169 on: March 12, 2010, 10:00:47 am »

Assume I believe string theory to be true. Does that mean I'm a religious person? That I follow the religion of String Theory?

Is String Theory a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe? (As far as i am aware, it is not. String Theory might explain the nature of the universe, and perhaps could lead to an answer for the cause of the universe, but no science will ever explain the purpose of the universe.)

Quote
2. If, however, the requirement is necessary, but not sufficient for something to be a religion, as suggested by your second sentence, but the further characteristics are completely optional: Then please tell me how you would ever tell that something that meets the requirement is not a religion.

Well, since the only time the classification 'Religion' actually matters is for purposes of law, that's when a bunch of Politicians, and possibly Lawyers and other civil servants, get together and have a debate as to if the set of beliefs qualifies as a Religion or not for tax purposes and soforth.

Quote
3. Finally, please give examples of belief systems commonly or scholarly thought of as religions that do not meet any of the other criteria.

I'd need to go find some on the intertubes, and as it is 2am and i am about to go to sleep, that will have to wait until tomorrow. I'm sure there's at least one religion somewhere that lacks superhuman agencies, ritual activities and a moral code.

dreiche2

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #2170 on: March 12, 2010, 10:16:30 am »

Is String Theory a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe? (As far as i am aware, it is not. String Theory might explain the nature of the universe, and perhaps could lead to an answer for the cause of the universe, but no science will ever explain the purpose of the universe.)

Yes, I agree that science shouldn't usually be about "purposes". But I'm not sure if the sentence necessarily has to be read to mean that religion has to address all three of cause, nature and purpose. I can certainly come up with a counter example of a religion that does not address one of these things, either.

Quote
2. If, however, the requirement is necessary, but not sufficient for something to be a religion, as suggested by your second sentence, but the further characteristics are completely optional: Then please tell me how you would ever tell that something that meets the requirement is not a religion.

Well, since the only time the classification 'Religion' actually matters is for purposes of law, that's when a bunch of Politicians, and possibly Lawyers and other civil servants, get together and have a debate as to if the set of beliefs qualifies as a Religion or not for tax purposes and soforth.

Well, apparently the definition matters to us, or otherwise we wouldn't have this silly discussion. Actually, it doesn't really matter to me personally what the exact definition is - because there is none - I'm just trying argue against what I perceive as wrong definitions that lead to misunderstandings and wrong conclusions.

Quote
3. Finally, please give examples of belief systems commonly or scholarly thought of as religions that do not meet any of the other criteria.

I'd need to go find some on the intertubes, and as it is 2am and i am about to go to sleep, that will have to wait until tomorrow. I'm sure there's at least one religion somewhere that lacks superhuman agencies, ritual activities and a moral code.

I can wait  :).
Logged

Il Palazzo

  • Bay Watcher
  • And lo, the Dude did abide. And it was good.
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #2171 on: March 12, 2010, 12:22:01 pm »

dreiche2 hits the thread multiple times with his logic and with clarity!
It is bruised!
It is bruised!

The thread cannot be killed this way, it's got to high a DAM_BLOCK(or was it DAMBLOCK?) in it's raws.
Logged

Andir

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #2172 on: March 12, 2010, 12:37:39 pm »

The thread cannot be killed this way

What's with the obsession on killing this thread?
Logged
"Having faith" that the bridge will not fall, implies that the bridge itself isn't that trustworthy. It's not that different from "I pray that the bridge will hold my weight."

Micro102

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #2173 on: March 12, 2010, 01:02:25 pm »

Because for some reason people who don't want to read it feels compelled to  ???
Logged

Neruz

  • Bay Watcher
  • I see you...
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #2174 on: March 12, 2010, 04:40:44 pm »

Quote
Yes, I agree that science shouldn't usually be about "purposes". But I'm not sure if the sentence necessarily has to be read to mean that religion has to address all three of cause, nature and purpose. I can certainly come up with a counter example of a religion that does not address one of these things, either.

I would be most interested in a Religion that does not hit the 'cause, nature and purpose of the universe' part.
Pages: 1 ... 143 144 [145] 146 147 ... 370