because you convinced Max you weren't scum, which isn't an easy feat.
Max was townreading Egan. That could've fucked me if Egan was playing and Max decided on Egan in spite of me, which, you know, I could imagine Max doing!
Well...
Uh, I've got to level with you, I was null on Egan, I just made that post to fish you and Toony. I didn't exactly scumread him, but nominating him definitely wasn't going to happen. I had even made the "Bluarian luck" joke in my head a couple hours before that post at a time when I did scumread him, and the only reason I stopped is because he didn't fit with
you and Toony together. I'm not trying to say "ha ha I knew all along" because obviously it was not where I was looking when I should've been; it's more that, like I said when I voted for Jim, I was deeply conflicted about almost everyone and, for all intents and purposes, just
made up almost all my reads this game. That's why they were so all over the place in some cases, like when I went back and forth on knightwing... other than a strong suspicion on ToonyMan that I
am willing to take credit for, I had no firm idea what was going on. In the end, just like I implied, I picked Jim by counting off everyone I wasn't sure about, and he was the only one left.
So, I'm not convinced that I played that well this game, except in those last moments of deciding to focus on voting for town instead of worrying about finding scum, which I guess did turn out to be the right thing to do. I'll take the credit for that too, but you (webadict) probably did better overall, especially by taking the lesson about Knightwing to heart when I totally failed to. (There's a reason I was so noncommittal about reading him every time someone asked, and moved my opinion back and forth like that: it seemed like - I didn't not SEE it - he was behaving almost exactly like scum knightwing from last time, yet somehow I just couldn't convince myself about it intuitively. Since I had been going on so much about following my gut, then, I decided not to let my rational observation that he seemed basically the same take precedence, when it obviously should have. Maybe I used up all my knightwing-reading ability last time. Or webadict stole it. Or, more likely, during the period when I was really bored and didn't have my head in the game, I let myself choose some of my reads more based on contrarianism than real consideration, then didn't take the time to reconsider them. I'm sorry about that. My only defense is to say that at least I wasn't
sure.)
I was hoping being partners with KW again would create a blindspot of the same scumteam. Gambler's Fallacy be damned.
For me it did a little bit, not in that I thought you couldn't be in the same team again by chance, but because I figured you'd be angrier if you had to carry the whole team a second time in a row.
Your apparent breeziness made me think you must have a strong partner, which led me to accusing webadict.
One more thing: I should have townread Roden more strongly, clearly. Roden is kind of an exception to what I said before in that I never actually thought he was scum at all, but for some reason I have a really hard time convincing myself that I'm reading him right. It's the same thing that ultimately tripped me up in the last Fallacy Clockwork Marathon Hell game. I remember saying exactly that to EuchreJack in the mason chat: that I townread Roden but I wasn't sure enough that I could read Roden at all to believe it. He's probably not as mystifying as I seem to think. I guess I'll have to wait for him to be mafia again to try to get a better heuristic.