It's a miracle, is it not?
Just to let you know, I am a lifeguard, and I have 20 minutes on-stand, and 20 minutes in the office. So I'll post 20 minutes of content, then disappear for 20 minutes.
Continuing with Hepah:
Noticed a discrepency here:
In the end it looks like this game is a repeat of every game I played so far: get indoctrinated into the bay12 playstyle or die, Lynch inactive player, scum kill active player.
I don't think D1 lynches on inactives are bad, given the alternative.
when earlier, he said this:
Regarding the RVS question above, it ties into the "why". I've never heard a good reason or explanation on how someone could divine something about my alignment based on whether I prefer baked or mashed potatoes. In my eyes, someone asking that type of question generally means one of three things:
1.) Lazy Townie. If there's no way they can care about your response, they had no reason to ask the question besides wanting to look active.
2.) Lazy Scum. When you already know who isn't scum, you are just kinda going through the motions if you want to take it easy (good scum may try to suss out roles or behavior patterns).
3.) Total newbie. They just don't know any better or how to scumhunt (though truth be told I barely know how to on Day 1 as well).
Happily, the response to 1 and 2 is the same: stick their neck in a noose until they convince you it doesn't belong there. Either you get a lazy townie engaged (win), or you lynch some scum (win), or you lynch a lazy townie (unfortunate, but I'd lynch lazy town over active town anyway). And for the newbies, well...you help them as best you can, but this is Mafia and you're gonna kill innocent folk sometimes.
Earlier, he said day 1 lynches on inactives was "unfortunate", while later, he said that is was "not a bad thing" This could be a slip, or just him reajusting to the meta, and molding his own policies towards inactives as the game goes on. I personally believe it to be the later.
Anyways, he tells doll that he doesn't like extentions when the extra time wouldn't be used, but then votes to extend again. I don't blame him, because day one was still a clusterfuck by that point.
I would like to draw attention to the interesting dynamic between Hepah and roo. Roo opens the game voting Hepah, then moves it. Before putting it back on again. roo then puts some interesting accusations on Hepah, which Hepah seems to agree with. Also, Hepah seemed to prefer to pick on TBF rather than roo, even though both were doing similar things.
GTG