Let's say I start doing carpentry work on my own, but get too much work to do on my own, so I hire people to help. Now I have to spend more time finding work to keep everyone employed. Also, making sure there is enough extra money for parts, tools, insurance, and work vehicles. Suddenly I'm the enemy because I have employees?
Nah, you're the enemy because you're probably making some major markup over what you're paying them for their labor, heh, far in excess of what effort you're putting into handling logistics (assuming you're actually handling those logistics, anyway, and not just arranging jobs and soaking cash and letting everyone else involved deal with the rest). Good odds there's also some level of abuse thrown in there, too, because there often is and the system we're working in heavily encourages it.
Or in other words, no, at least not until you start treating
them like an enemy, and then yes! Unfortunately, the nature of incentives involved means, barring something else
stopping you, you're very,
very likely to start doing that sooner or later.
Smaller scale operations are... I'unno if less abusive is quiet the right term, because they're absolutely chock full of abuse, but at least it's less likely the head honcho(s) are
completely divorced from ground level operations and steadily accruing the literal brainrot that we've found can accompany high wealth/authority positions? It's something. Generally less of a problem than the blighters that are the primary drivers of anti-union sentiment, at the absolute least.