Making it easy and preferably obvious to know where to look for evidence is the first step. We no longer live in a world where we have to take the media's word for it all the time.
The
entire reason Qanon and adjacent conspiracy theories have flourished this year is that there are so many people trying to look for evidence without taking the media's word for it.
This is literally impossible. No human being can come anywhere close to forming a first-order approximation of a first-order approximation of a hundredth of a hundredth of the information they care about from raw sources. Human brain isn't up to it, and there aren't enough hours in the day.
Just on the current subject, understanding why that video is not evidence of wrongdoing requires exhaustive understanding of the vote-counting rules and procedures of fifty independent governments. This understanding has to extend not only to the written laws, but to the realities and unwritten standards that have evolved over literal decades (two
centuries in the case of at least half the states) of carrying out this ritual.
Nobody can do that while having an understanding of military procurement, tax policy, polling methodology, economic theory, or demographic analysis. To say nothing about the literally thousands of other factors that are needed to make an informed choice on who to vote for in an election. That's why we have a shitton of specialists to take the one thing they're good at and boil it down to something the rest of us can easily grasp without that deep foundation. This allows us to make informed decisions without going deeper than "is this group of experts trustworthy.