It seems a bit odd to invoke 9/11 and talk about the rage you feel toward the bastards that did it, considering that the Saudis are funding Clinton massively (and given what came out this year about the role of Saudis and Saudi money in 9/11).
It seems a bit off to invoke "THE SAUDIS DID 9!!" when I'm here talking about the Nuclear Holocaust; ok? Seriously. I've got "End of Days" shit here and you are rattling about amateur hour conspiracy theory. Come on man. Work with me.
I mean, you did bring up 9/11. It also seems disingenuous to dismiss it as 'amateur hour conspiracy theory'. Serious publications and agencies have raised these concerns.
9/11 was completely tangential, and it is still completely tangential, which is why I refuse to argue with you about it. It has nothing to do with my point. I could strip 9/11 from my point and the point, which is "Destroying everything you hold dear will piss you off and make you willing to repay the injury in blood". I'm not going to argue with you about anything else that isn't my point. You wanna do that argue with someone else. Misko is nuclear annihilation man.
Honestly this entire election has just been a huge case of people going from tangent to tangent blindly. Why is anyone even discussing Nuclear weapons? Why am I doing this? I don't know. I did it because everyone else was going on about it, despite it being less relevant than ever, and Nuclear Deterrence is my field.
Legit can't tell if I fucked up my joke or if it's just, as Ispil might say, 'woosh'.
I caught the joke. It was just a stupid joke. My point still stands.
Also the only person who I've seen bring up any kind of (rhetorical) attack on America by 'foreigners' is Misko. Kot's posting appeared neither insulting (to anyone beyond Clinton and Trump, at least, which is hardly an uncommon sentiment) nor particularly angry - if anything, Misko, you seem to be projecting.
Kot is going around here talking, repeatedly, about how he wishes next President of the United States was dead and that he would do it himself if he had the chance, and positively remarking about Trump's policy of glassing the middle east, and I'm the unreasonable person. I'm not even exaggerating. That's what he just said. I don't even know what the middle east has even
done to Poland to deserve nuclear annihilation. One would think of other nations would top Poland's list, but no.
And for the foreigner angle, it's actually that almost all posts in this thread as of late critical of Clinton and saying that she's equal or worse than Trump come from foreigners.
Oh hey. Someone else noticed. I'm not crazy. I really did think I was crazy, too. But it's just increasingly strange to me that most everyone who has come out and said how terrible both are, but how much marginally worse Clinton is, are all foreigners. It's been very strange. I can actually name exceptions, and I'm sure they'll make themselves known (Edit: already did), but most of posters here who've been most vocal about Clinton's irredeemable evil have been largely people who are not from this country. Perhaps its because they can't actually vote against her that there has been this need to talk out their problems, but its still odd and unexplained to me.
Cough
Nice to see you trying to discount those of us critical of Clinton as non-American...
Where have I heard that before...
It's nice to be an exception, isn't it?
You know what, I really do miss being unreasonable. It's quite nice. It's much better than being right and upset. Being unreasonable and happy is much better. Can we talk about going to war with Syria again? Since it's clearly next on the agenda after Clinton wins, after all. I was promised bombing.
EIther way, I need some damn sleep. I'm up in three hours.
Author
Topic: Doc Helgoland's Asylum for the Politically American: T+0 (Read 1422316 times)