Question on a few instances of alignment in certain acts:
Our party Druid has a tendency to confuse opponents by making out with them. One of the guys he was doing this to got hit with a charm spell from someone else and kept making out with him against his will until the battle was over. The party fighter saw this, who is lawful good, goes up to him and shoots him in the head, saying it was to "end his suffering".
Is this a chaotic act or an evil act? Because he instantly got shot to chaotic neutral alignment for this (also, I don't want anyone getting pissy and saying its a hate crime and starting a flame war. He did it because his character didn't want the guy to live on knowing he was technically forced into a make out session with the Druid, which the Druid was then trying to get in his pants)
On the topic of said Druid, my character (a chaotic neutral barbarian) ended up causing a dwarf to lose his arm because I used him as a weapon while his arm was stuck on a shield planted into the ground. The Druid heals him, and while we rested, he slept next to the one arm dwarf, who, in the middle of the night, starts crying because he shock finally left him and he realized he has no arm now. The Druid responds to the crying by patting his head and saying "it's gonna be ok". He then, after a discussion on how greater restoration should restore a single lost limb, he puts he arm back on using the spell.
Question on this one: what alignment would you consider this Druid? Other deeds he has include masturbating in public, doing jobs without gold payment, trying very hard to fuck a paladin (who I'm trying to kill), flirting with everyone male, aiding Druids in a civil war because it's he right thing to do, and constantly joking with a party member who's a 15 year old girl who gets nosebleeds from lewd thoughts of him making out with another dude. My DM thinks he's a borderline psychopath, but I don't know honestly