Can we have a list of installed G2O weapons, and whether they require resources unattainable from ITL-5 tech for repairs?
>Inventory Combat Systems
>Filter: Orbit-capable munitionsHull 101 strategic weapons compliment in order of least->most capable for orbital target engagement:
4x 200cm direct-fire kinetic accelerator Munition: Unguided Ferrous Slugs
2x 240cm rocket-assist projectile launcher Munition: Guided HHE Projectile
1x HVK-Hammer kinetic kill warhead (VLS) ((All other VLS tubes empty))
Note -- Additional tactical systems not listed under previous query:
15x 20cm direct-fire kinetic accelerator
12x 40cm mortar/artillery
2x 120cm howitzer
These systems, while theoretically orbit-capable with modification//specialized munitions, are not commonly used to engage orbital targets.
Additionally, Hull 101 is capable of reconfiguring to support a single 380cm Siege Cannon which is also capable of engaging orbital targets but firing the siege cannon is (strongly) not recommended while on a planetary surface//in atmosphere
Asymmetrical warfare advisor Nullius online.
Query: CognOS, possibility of fabricating high-yield hydrogen fusion core?
Query: CognOS, if construction of fusion core is possible, possibility of fabricating Plasma Soliton Furnace?
Assertion: Likelihood of locating replacement for main power system is low, and current output is inadequate for sustained GTO combat.
Assertion: Adding a lower-efficiency, high-output PSF would substantially increase combat capacity in the interim.
Intriguing...
Such a device is within current fabrication constraints and, as fuel is plentiful, the lower efficiency would not necessarily impact operations especially if the Furnace were used only for short-burst-high-yield operations.
I have sent the specifications for this device to Logistics and fabrication of the shell will begin using materials gathered as we proceed. If we are forced to use
ITL-5 materials for the device then performance will be poor, but if we find another technology cache we will have a viable high yield power source.
While the most recent events may not support this suggestion, it may be logical to operate under the conclusion that the factions we have observed are not directly hostile. As noted, the attack we just survived may not have been for us, and the exchanges we have been involved in already seem to be a result of misunderstanding and our state of disrepair.
I recommend we present this info to CCC and suggest downgrading the 'hostiles' to a 'minor threat'. We should avoid contact with any sentient life until we can identify their relationship to the dynasty. If they have no known connection, then only direct attacks after efforts to avoid and deter should indicate a direct threat, and a need to retaliate.
The intel we dug up only indicates a curiosty on the part of the local faction. They probably want to use hull 101's tech in their war. Dynasty tech must not fall into their hands.
Suggest long term goal: find tech caches, make use of them and destroy everything the hull cannot use. We cannot let dynasty tech fall into anyone else's hands
CCC has assigned/delegated the duties of hostility assignment to Subsentent processes so that will not be a problem. I have flagged the (presumed)
FWA fleet as non-hostile (suspected) and low threat. I have flagged the
PAL as Hostile but with no threat assessment. CCC will not accept a nonhostile designation of a group which has actively sought our destruction but with no threat assessment they will not be considered for any operational purposes.
Using data from the naval facility EWAR has located information indicating that another technology cache is on a ship 18 miles out from the coast. It appears to be heading north, to a dock/distribution point near the civilian population there. Should we pursue?
Hull 101 continues burrowing, clawing its way through caverns and subsurface aquifers. Every so often a valuable material is detected and harvested using remotes without the Hull slowing appreciably. Behind you is a mess of churned mud and pulverized rock. You have little doubt that your destructive brute-force passage beneath the earth is easily traceable by anyone with seismic sensors.The Anchorage base was underground, correct? We never did enter that space, but entered the low tech military base above. Determine likelihood of entering Anchorage base. at least build and deploy a scout machine to dig through to it and gather Dynasty resources. Failing this, locate the next nearest Dynasty base besides the one we awoke in and travel there.
Correct, we did not enter the ruins of the anchorage but the subsequent bombardment from orbit likely did significant damage to any intact systems or technology beneath the naval facility. If desired we could return and scavenge the ruins.
The next nearest Dynasty facility on record for this planet is a polar research outpost far to the north.
>_
Author
Topic: Battlewagon Sicily - Previously: Hull 101 (Read 48698 times)