Ah, so we're having a "let's show off the worse opinions on the conflict" moment?
Yup. I really, really wish that every pro-Russian article was a masterpiece of eloquence and impartiality, but sadly, most of them are just as hysterical and idiotic as the anti-Russian drivel that comes out of Kyiv's and Washington's propaganda bullhorns. So far, I found just two pro-Russian writers who are both predominantly rational and eloquent: Anatoly Karlin and Colonel Cassad. The problem is, Anatoly Karlin has written some horrible, horrible posts about women in the past and believes in stuff that can be quite racist sometimes, such as the genetic nature of IQ, while Colonel Cassad is a self-admitted propagandist for Novorossiya. So yeah.
EDIT: To clarify regaring Anatoly Karlin: he is a firm
believer in the
Bell Curve book, which argues for a predominantly genetic nature of IQ and that said nature has a certain maximum or minimum that depends mainly on a person's ancestry, i.e. race. Among other things, the Bell Curve argues that most African races are genetically inferior and that the Aryan race is genetically superior. It may be that господин Karlin is an unrecognised prophet who has seen the truth, but it is
far more likely that he is an ordinary racist who has latched onto that book because it gives scientific "basis" to his prejudice. Combined with his attitude towards women, this makes Anatoly not a man with whom I want to identify, even though I cannot find most of his articles about Russia anything but excellent.