Nothing is so minor it is not worth examining for it's Goodness.
I must ask, though, why the god of Humans goes to war with that of Hunger, if the humans are making their own, informed decision to be consumed? Their souls are not harmed by the process, and while I would object to the practice if the humans were not themselves volunteering for the process, I can see little reason to restrict the free will of the Gruen if they are behaving in a manner not unduly harmful to others.
I believe I will make my own proposal, however new I might be.
A...karmic balance, if you will. One meant to encourage and foster both cooperation and freedom, to keep integrity and fair play active. Rewarding those who merit rewards and would receive none, while punishing to some degree those who would punish others unfairly, and cause harm. If you would allow me to elaborate to some degree the mechanics of the system, I would be grateful.
The behaviour which entails reward and that the system is meant to entice is that of selflessness. The aid of others. This is primarily focused on the intent of the individual, not simply the result,though the result is not important. Thus, true selflessness would be Good. That which already benefits oneself would result in a lesser reward, while that which is actively detrimental would thusly need to be balanced out, in the interest of fairness and justice.
Self-interest that does not harm others is reasonable and expected behaviour in all beings, thus it would be the standard, or neutral in this system.
Selfishness at the expense of others is behaviour which actively degrades society and is a detriment, in the long run, to all beings; if those who practice it are shown as successful, it will encourage others to engage in it, leading to a general decrease in the quality of life; one can harm many to benefit oneself, or benefit many at the cost of only oneself. For those of you interested only in your own power, consider that an unhappy populace is rarely a devout populace.
Some wrongs, or they might be called sins, would include the breaking or betrayal of trust, the restriction of another's free will and choice, and causing harm to others. Unfortunately, sometimes these may come into conflict with one another, or be, in the end, necessary; restricting someone's choices who would otherwise choose to do the same to others, for example, is just and necessary. Reasonable individuals can, of course, understand when this is the case, and it would be unfair to punish someone for an action that is truly necessary, unavoidable, or just. Again, intent is an important factor. For thia reason, and in the interest if fairness, I would like to propose a sub-council, or committee, of gods that might be in charge of such a system, of varying viewpoints and interests, that would hopefully be able to determine what is right, and what is wrong. As this was my proposal, and I feel that I am the best suited to mediate disagreements -and I may be proven wrong on that point-, I believe that it is only proper that I be the head of any such committee in it's dealings with the karmic system. All gods, would, of course, have at least some small say; that is only fair, after all, for it will affect all of our followers, and possibly all of us.